BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Robert B. Parker and the Spenser series.

 
 
hachiman
12:42 / 02.10.04
checking to see if any 'lithers share my love for Parker's Spenser series. What would (my) life be without Spenser, Hawk and Susan Siverman. Also I recommend checking out the Sunny Randall series, just as cool.
 
 
iconoplast
15:15 / 03.10.04
While I really liked the first, I don't know... 15? 20? Spenser books I read, I haven't been feeling the recent ones all that much. I think Parker's bored of Spenser. But still, he had an amazing run of tight, fun, and funny novels.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:03 / 03.10.04
Could I ask what these books are about? Who are these characters, and what do they do?
 
 
hachiman
12:38 / 16.10.04
Weell , for those who dont know, the Spenser series deals with the adventures of Boston's toughest and most literate private eye, the afore-mentioned Spenser("with an 's' like the poet"), often aided and abetted by both long time buddy,(DONT call him side-kick), Hawk, the best hitman on the East Coast, and Spenser's love interest, psychiatrist Dr. Susan Silverman. The series is written by English professor Robert B. Parker, and has seen a new entry every year since the early seventies.
The Spenser series is renowned for its interesting emotionally engaging plots, ridiculously funny one-liners, incredibly cool characters (Hawk and Spenser and friends have spawned a legion of imitators) and simply excellent writing by Mr. Parker. (Ran out of gushing adjectives
Many people will remember the tv series of the 80's with Robert Urich, which to Spenser purists like myself is merely a bland imitation, barring Avery Brooks excellent rendition of Hawk. The 3 tv movies of the 90's were, if anything, worse. A good Spenser movie or tv adaption is something the fatbeard in me continues to long for.
For anyone interested in reading the series I recommend starting with "Promised Land", with Hawk's 1st appearance and working forward from there. Probably the best period to concentate on is the series of novel written from 1980 onward, including "Early Autumn" and concluding with "a Catskill Eagle". These novels contain the very best of Mr. Paker's work, though as a died-in-the-wool fan boy i continue to read and enjoy the series.
In all honesty i must admit that it has seemed as if recently Mr. Parker has gotten a little bit bored with Spenser, and seems to be concentrating on his newer characters, including the Sunny Randall series, which i feel to be as good as any of the equally excellent V.I. Warshawski and other female detective series being published.
Lastly, sorry for the tardiness of my post. Internet access is an infrequent thing for me.
 
 
eddie thirteen
03:42 / 20.10.04
I have this weird thing with mysteries of the whodunit variety wherein, while I enjoy reading them, virtually all the plot details fall right out of my brain within 72 hours of completing such a book, and I'm left only with the memory of having liked it. It's kinda like the literary equivalent of Chinese food. I've read a few of Parker's Spenser books and liked them, but I couldn't tell you a damn thing about any of them. See also Tony Hillerman and, to a lesser degree, Walter Mosley (I tend to remember a LOT of the character-driven aspects of his mysteries, but the plot stuff...yeah, not so much). Is it just me?
 
 
hachiman
12:56 / 28.10.04
I dont seem to have the same problem, but then i am a deluxe fanatic about Parker's stuff. Havent read any Tony Hillerman, but i do like Mosley's stuff alot. Also fond of Harlan Coben's Myron Bolitar, and Robert Crais' Elvis Cole. The sons of Spenser as a critic called them.
Have tried some of Lawrence Block's books recently, and while i recognize how good they are, they haven really grabbed me.
Any other takers?
 
 
misterpc
15:52 / 31.10.04
The Spenser books are fantastic, but having read every single one of them (as far as I know), I think it's fair to say that the glory days for Spenser were the 1980s. The more recent books have just exposed the weaknesses of the characters rather than the strengths, and it becomes increasingly obvious that Spenser himself is Robert B. Parker's macho power fantasy. But they're still triple-decker pulp action sandwiches, and I eat 'em up every time.
 
 
hachiman
13:32 / 04.11.04
DUDE! Dont you know that that's the whole point of detective fiction? Of course Spenser is Parker's macho idealization of himself. So is Elvis Cole of Robert Crais, and Myron Bolitar of Harlan Coben, and Atticus Kodiak of Greg Rucka, etc, etc. Its seems to me to be the major conceit of the genre as a whole. The protagonist is always the man the writer would like to be, differing in details, and of course, the ability to do violence.
Occasionally i knock around with the idea of a similar detective series set in Cape Town, and I'll be damned if my protagonist does'nt look and act a heck of alot like yours truly, barring the minor details.
It also seems that as a writer improves that they seem to outgrow the character and move on or at least also do other things. I am NOT there yet.
 
  
Add Your Reply