I don't think anyone is ever completely healed of anything, as every new mindset invaribly brings about new neurosis, some worse then others. How can one gauge health? It's like illumination... If something as simple as a lightbulb is not aware that it is illuminated, how can something as complex as a human being know that he/she is? I certainly don't think of it as a cop-out to excuse oneself from helping others. When I was talking about "healing the wasteland" I was referring to change on a global scale, which is a wee bit more difficult to change then, say, helping your friends out or co-workers or what not.
2stepfan, I agree that, even when doing something for others, you're still (sometimes) getting something out of it, even if it's something as simple as just feeling good about yourself. There's nothing wrong with this of course, better to feel good about yourself then bad.
I agree, Miraclemax, that perhaps the modern magician reads too many books rather then actually interact with the outside world, and this is definetly a problem. Still, there's nothing wrong with being informed. I think creating a magical system takes a great deal of time and experimentation before it gels. Personally speaking, my thoughts on the subject have changed quite a bit over the years as I've trawled through all this subject matter and decided what was shit and what was worth keeping. I agree in spreading the cheer, though. Hell, this is coming from someone who used to write cheerful, sunny poetry on restroom walls to counter against the usual vulgar racial, sexist, homophobic slurs so prevelant in that environment.
There was a quote in "Transmetroploitan" that I really liked. "The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailable supserstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, and intolerable, and if so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are" (H.L. Mencken, 1919). I especially like that last sentence. I realize I'm in no positition to effect mass change, I simply don't have the means, money, or connections. However, if I were to ever write or create something that inspires those who do have the means to effect mass change, then I'd have played my part in the chain. In the meantime, I'm sticking to small scale goals.
Part of the problem with the global mindest is how different every culture and country is from one another. I mean, I think killing cats is the most horrible thing ever. I can't understand how other countries eat cats for food (granted, their food situation isn't as good as the USA). To me, cats are sacred animals (as they were to the Ancient Egyptians) so it's a mindest I can't understand. Still, I CAN help cats here, so if I can at least help the local cats out, that's something. Anyway, one needs to find the middle pillar in between cynical detachment and dangerous idealism. Look at the characters of the Comedian & Veidt in Alan Moore's "watchmen" comic. The former represents a man who, looking out at the insane violence of the world, decided to become a reflection of it, and as a result became a detached, cynical butcher. Veidt, the latter, was on the other hand idealistic about the destiny of the human race, an idealism so fierce he was responsible for the death of half of New York City. I think both mental states are, ultimetly, deluded and dangerous. |