BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Motorcycle Diaries

 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
15:45 / 13.09.04
Attention Barbelith! Tired of suckling on the rancid genitalia of a dead science-fiction franchise? (I suspect many of you are not, but no matter.) Help is at hand!

The Motorcycle Diaries is a road movie about Ernesto Guevara and Alberto Granado... I'm just going to cut and paste the synopsis, okay?

In 1952, two young Argentines, Ernesto Guevara and Alberto Granado, set out on a road trip to discover the real Latin America. Ernesto is a 23-year-old medical student specializing in leprology, and Alberto, 29, is a biochemist. The film follows the young men as they unveil the rich and complex human and social topography of the Latin American continent.

With a highly romantic sense of adventure, the two friends leave their familiar surroundings in Buenos Aires on a rickety 1939 Norton 500. Although the bike breaks down in the course of their eight-month journey, they press onward, hitching rides along the way. As they begin to see a different Latin America in the people they meet on the road, the diverse geography they encounter begins to reflect their own shifting perspectives. They continue to the heights of Machu Picchu, where the majestic ruins and the extraordinary significance of the Inca heritage have a profound impact on the young men. As they arrive at a leper colony deep in the Peruvian Amazon, the two are beginning to question the value of progress as defined by economic systems that leave so many people beyond their reach. Their experiences at the colony awaken within them the men they will later become by defining the ethical and political journey they will take in their lives.

Based on the journals of both Alberto Granado and the man who would later become “El Che,” The Motorcycle Diaries follows a journey of self-discovery, tracing the origins of a revolutionary heart.


Anyway, this is the real shit, the good shit - it's a movie with heart. It's very encouraging in terms of staying political, staying radical. I dunno, there's a lot of people out there who want to stop people being radical, a lot of moderates and apologists, and sometimes it's very easy to get worn down by that. This is a good film to see if you've got worn down and need to get fired up again. It's an incredibly humane, kind film, and it reminds you that being humane and kind will always lead to radicalism, never to moderatism.

Remember how people talked about Barbelith "claiming" movies? Well, this is the film that needs to claim Barbelith. This film owns you all.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
17:03 / 13.09.04
Nicky Wire sez: "If, like us, you like to ignore the unsavourey aspects of Che Guevara and Castro's Cuba, then why don't you go and see this film? You stole the sun from my heart but this film put it back and chased away the black dog too! Five out of five hoovers from me!"
 
 
Loomis
17:39 / 13.09.04
Yes! I barely see any movies so I'm not much of an authority, but I saw this movie the other night and thought it was lovely. A simple road movie with engaging characters and charismatic actors, illustrating how radicalism can be born from everyday needs and emotions rather than being imposed from theory.
 
 
Loomis
17:40 / 13.09.04
But that doesn't mean I'm able to let go of Star Wars. Mmm ... rancid.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
06:49 / 14.09.04
you like to ignore the unsavourey aspects of Che Guevara

Obviously it's much better to allude to them sarcastically without saying what you actually mean. Well done!
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
07:02 / 14.09.04
Let me put it another way: was that remark meant to translate as "I have seen The Motorcycle Diaries and would argue that it glosses over the unsavoury aspects of Ernesto Guevera's life and politics", or "Ernesto Guevera is such a heinous historical figure that nobody should go and see a film that portrays him at all sympathetically"?
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
14:40 / 14.09.04
No, it was meant as 'I want to annoy Flyboy'. Would you like to comment on the reviews I've seen in some places (such as the 'IoS') which say this film makes the character of Che out to be a modern Jesus, weeping at the poverty and injustice in this world?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
14:51 / 14.09.04
I suggest that those reviewers need to get off the Christianity bus. Comparing characters to Jesus is possibly the laziest device I can conceive of and it's even worse when it's meant in a derogatory sense. Someone's editor needs to get with the programme and start disallowing the nonsense.

In other words, anyone who writes a review in which they compare a character to Jesus is an idiot anyway.
 
 
Loomis
17:17 / 14.09.04
I don't see what's wrong with showing the young Che in a positive light. That doesn't mean that he didn't do naughty things later in life. In fact, rather than excuse his dastardly deeds (assuming that they were such - I don't really know all the facts of his life), you could say that this film makes them appear even worse by contrast to the saint he was as a youth. Not that I would be lazy enough to compare him to a saint of course.

However, as much as I enjoyed the film, I did find the advertisement at the end for Che t-shirts to be a little tacky.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
11:03 / 15.09.04
Lady, since I know you don't believe Jesus was our Lord and Saviour, the Son of God, what's wrong with portraying Ernesto Guevera in a Jesus-like manner? Popular idealist and charismatic radical who was executed for his ideals and then became a much-debated cult figure and icon... It's not that much of a stretch.

As for "weeping at the poverty and injustice in this world"... Well, hurrah for cynicism. The film is about two quite privileged young men, who have a degree of political awareness in theoretical terms, going out into the world and learning about poverty and injustive in a more immediate, experiential way. It affects them both, and I would be surprised if its depiction did not affect most viewers (the film doesn't need to even try to make it clear that the kinds of poverty and injustive it depicts are just as common today).

Obviously Ernesto's reaction to this is the focus of the movie, but its not the whole thing. Whilst Alberto is a worldy guy (which is a beautiful thing in its own way, cf the gambling sequence and others), he's someone who is on his own journey in the film. He's probably a more likely figure for most people to empathise with, as the path he seems to be heading towards involves helping people, but with some degree of compromise. The film shows you the difference between a worldview that allows for compromise and one that doesn't, and I don't think it beats you over the head with the idea that compromise is always wrong - strategically, Ernesto's absolute honesty doesn't always help their situation, and it's certainly something that we're meant to feel is unusual, and hard to relate to in a way.

At the end of the film, Alberto watches Ernesto fly off in a plane and the emotional impact comes from knowing that Ernesto's burgeoning radicalism is taking him away from his friend and into potentially dangerous terrain - and eventually to his death. Ernesto's idealism is this kind of bright-burning, unreasonable quality... Is it portrayed as Christ-like? Maybe. But I dunno, there are plenty of people I've come into contact with who seem to do more to fight for justice than could be reasonably expected, and they do tend to be that charismatic. So I don't think that's necessarily a distortion. What it is, is a challenge, because in some ways this film is saying "anyone can have the kind of awakening that forces them to become that kind of person, if they're brave enough".
 
 
Jack Fear
16:01 / 07.11.04
Saw this in theatre last night, and thought it very good, in its way. Wonderfully acted, very funny in parts, wonderful music (mostly--could've done without the ooooh-spooky-ominous ELECTRIC GEETARS that cropped up occasionally), and above all a great-looking movie. Like Hero, it's a wonderful combination of the kinetic and the lyrical (maybe too kinetic: all the shakey-cam in the first half left me a bit seasick), and like Hero it glories in geography and faces that you just don't find in American film. Unfortunately, also like Hero, it's a film that's easier to enjoy if you gloss over its politics, which were--well, a little muddled.

The impression I was left with, in the end, was: Well, here's this nice young man, full of humanity and kindness... so what went wrong to make him so brutal and doctrinaire?

The movie itself doesn't tell us. Indeed, surprisingly little attention is paid to Ernesto's economic radicalization. Indeed, one might be forgiven for thinking that Ernesto's plunge into the class war was primarily the result of his "posh" "bird"'s refusal to "shag" "him". Throughout the film he seems to be, at heart, a dedicated, conscientious middle-class professional (as are all the doctors and staff at the leper colony; so much for the Boy Fly's assertion that "being humane and kind will always lead to radicalism, never to moderatism"--the folks doing the actual hard work of helping the lepers looked pretty apolitical, even bourgeois, to me), and that seens to be presented as an entirely honorable state.

(Which is why I do agree, with slight reservation, with the Boy's third paragraph immediately above about the compare/contrast of Alberto and Ernesto--although the respective political baggage we brought to the film meant that split played rather differently for each of us.)

Anyway--Ernesto's "radicalization," in the film (or at this stage of his life), seems to be less about redistribution of wealth and more about ethnic solidarity, given his "one mestizo nation" speech on his last night at the leprosarium. Which is well and good. But it makes you wonder what business he thought he had fucking around in the Congo.

Then again, maybe there's a clue to that, too. In the leper colony sequence, we get montages of Che Flaco and Che Gordo at work, breaking rules, bringing a transformational humanity to the place--shifting the paradigm, winning hearts, changing lives, their own not least of all--the work of years, it seems. And then it's mentioned, almost as a throwaway, that they're leaving the colony after having been there for all of three weeks.

Wonder how long it took Che to "get" Africa? A couple of afternoons? A fortnight, tops?

And don't even get me started on the "Magic Negro" factor, where encounters with a downtrodden minority happen primarily so that Our Heroes can Learn A Valuable Lesson...

Still, I enjoyed it immensely while I was actually watching it.
 
 
Benny the Ball
22:46 / 07.11.04
I found the bi-polar nature of the narrative too much of a jarr. Also to start the film with a disclaimer about it not being about heroes but to then have the second half a tale of how great che was didn't sit right. The whole thing with him swimming across the river and being with the lepers was too much. Nice photography but just a bit too isn't he great for my liking.
 
  
Add Your Reply