BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


The Rise and Fall of Steve Yeowell: A Photo-Essay

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
miss wonderstarr
22:35 / 12.09.04


My first experience of Steve Yeowell’s artwork was in August 1987, with a teaser in 2000AD prog 534 for next week’s new thrill, Zenith. When the Maximan and Masterman prologue opened Phase I, the following week, I consciously memorised Yeowell’s name into my teenage top 5 of 2000AD artists. In an era of Bellardinelli’s grotesquely-untalented drawing for Mean Team, Yeowell stood out from the start with work of an old-skool Eagle standard: lovingly detailed, almost photographic in some frames, yet with a feeling of comic-book tradition about it. When the story moved from the Forties to the Eighties, the world Yeowell co-created became even more rich in cultural references.



Phase II followed in Autumn 88, with Yeowell’s style becoming bolder and more confident. Frames of superhero action now exploded with speedlines borrowed from contemporary manga like Mai the Psychic Girl; rather than the dutiful filling in of backgrounds and careful dressing of every setting with props, Yeowell was blocking in spaces with black, playing with shadows, suggesting rather than showing everything.



Phase III, blowing minds from May 89, is still one of the very greatest superhero epics I’ve ever read, and to my mind a career triumph for Yeowell – perhaps even for Morrison. Across 26 episodes, the artist pushed himself into a new zone, moving further away from what now seemed the diligent, almost pedantic craftsmanship of Phase I into quick, sure strokes, full of energy but conveying an incredible range of facial expression and body language in the minimum dashed-off lines.



---------------

As this Feb 88 pin-up demonstrates, Yeowell’s painting was equally gorgeous – this image shows both Zenith and his artist in Phase I mode.



A rare Dredd guest spot from the end of the decade shows how Yeowell’s style of painting, as well as inked art, has evolved within two years – again, there’s more a sense of suggestion and stylisation, in contrast to the earlier work’s striving for a near-photographic quality. Two painted 2000AD covers for Zenith during 1989 showcase a very similar style.



At around the time of Zenith Phase III, Yeowell and Morrison were also working together on The New Adventures of Hitler – it was published in black and white for The Cut, but following an editorial outcry the strip moved to Crisis in 1990, where Yeowell’s art was computer-coloured by Nick Abadzis et al. Beneath the overlaid effects and gimmickry, Yeowell’s style is clearly still in its Phase III period.




NEXT -- HUNT THE STEVE KNIGHT
 
 
Billuccho!
23:04 / 12.09.04
More, I say!
 
 
John Octave
02:49 / 13.09.04
You know, I recently loaned my friend my Sebastian O TPB. She'd never read a whole comic before but she's really into Oscar Wilde and so I thought she'd enjoy it.

Anyway, she really dug the story but complained about the art. She said the characters were drawn inconsistent. And as much as I love the art in the book (the scene of Sebastian leaping onto the train in part 3 is just BEAUTIFULLY rendered) I'm wondering if she doesn't have a point. I notice it here and there, but not enough that to really bother me.

So I'm looking forward to the author of this fine thread's comments about that book in particular. Can't say I've seen much of his artwork outside of Sebastian O and Invisibles (and I thought Yeowell's couple pages in Invisibles Vol. III showed a marked decline in quality, which will perhaps be elaborated upon later as the "decline").
 
 
_Boboss
07:36 / 13.09.04
but but - are we finished there? i thought his best moment was when the molotov cocktail goes through the library winodow, and then at the end when he touches the surface of the panel - he's a good sf illustrator, i think the way his art has changed from the blacks to the blocks of colour fits and pops along nicely.
 
 
Dan Fish - @Fish1k
08:01 / 13.09.04
I got this sketch at Bristol 04, maybe a return to form, certainly a newer parallel line style:
 
 
Dan Fish - @Fish1k
08:02 / 13.09.04
Okay, my HTML skills seem to have vanished or something, the pic is here:

http://www.comicartfans.com/GalleryPiece.asp?Piece=16358&GSub=1225&GCat=0&UCat=0
 
 
miss wonderstarr
08:50 / 13.09.04
IT'S HERE -- part 2 of 2 in a long-awaited series.

------------




Whether Zenith Phase IV, starting in Jun 1992, represented a tailing-off in narrative and character is perhaps a matter of opinion, but it can hardly be disputed that Yeowell’s art took a nosedive. The joint credits of “Yeowell/Hart” probably indicate a split between inks and colours, and Yeowell seems to entirely slack off, providing only basic outlines for Gina Hart’s equally crude digital decoration. There’s still – there always is, in Yeowell – a basic knack for effective composition, and some hint at the subtle expressions from earlier work, but the lines are slashed out in a rush, blocky and thick like something for a kid to colour in. The figures stand in a blank vacuum, ready to be filled in with a click of the first “light green” or “light blue” that came to hand.



Maniac 5, from the 2000AD1993 summer offensive that saw Morrison produce the mindless Ecstasy-drool of Really and Truly, finds Yeowell and Hart working on an equally throwaway script from Mark Millar, and producing the same flat work. Again the underlying structure is there – it’s not like Yeowell ever seems to lose his talent – but the backgrounds are left empty for a quick wash of unvaried colour, and characters are sketched in a rush.

Yeowell teams up with Morrison again for the Invisibles in September 1994, and seems to recover his earlier enthusiasm: the art here, coloured by Daniel Vozzo, has the solidity and detail – in simple terms, just the care and attention – of Yeowell’s late-80s work on Phase III and Hitler. His guest-spot on Doom Patrol, around the same period, is of the same style.





Inked by Dick Giordano, though, his pencils are barely recognisable beneath the fussy, unappealingly scratchy finish. The trademark talent for striking layouts is just about discernable but the overall look is uninspired, old-fashioned, generally unappealing.



Giordano seems to ease off in the next episodes, and the clean-cut, sure but quick Yeowell emerges: nothing striking, but at least it’s competent rather than ugly. A far cry, though, from the peak in Zenith Phase III when you could linger in wonder over individual frames – not an exaggeration, I used to photocopy and enlarge them to A4 to enjoy the single images. This art would do for a fight between Transformers, or a Spider-Man spin-off: it doesn’t jar, it tells a story, but just as you don’t stop to peer at it in distaste, so you don’t go back to admire it.



And this, from the penultimate Invisibles, is just baffling – according to the credits, Yeowell pencilled and inked it, but again, apart from an underlying knack for composition you wouldn’t pick it out of a line-up as Yeowell art. The textures are finicky, scratchy; the backgrounds lazy. It’s as though Yeowell decided to learn from Giordano’s nasty inking technique.





Finally, the Zenith postscript: written by Morrison as cheeky satire, and Yeowell’s more cartoony art is appropriate in that context – but interestingly, his black and white inks, with their solid light and shadow, their witty attention to detail hark back to the Phase II style of the late 1980s.

Is it just laziness that allows Yeowell to slip from such heights to undistinguished lows? Is he best when handling all aspects of the art duties, rather than providing only the basics for an inker or colorist to complete? What was he like on Zoids? What’s he doing now and is it any good?
 
 
miss wonderstarr
08:54 / 13.09.04
Oh yeah I forgot to include Sebastian O... and an example of Yeowell's Doom Patrol work. I would say the former is of the "well above average" Invisibles #1 standard, ie. below Zenith Phase III and Hitler, but better than Zenith Phase IV.

A significant lapse on my part but to be honest the scanning did take me hours.
 
 
Benny the Ball
09:12 / 13.09.04
His Zoids stuff was quite good, if a little basic, as with Doom Patrol.

I'd forgotten how bad Zenith IV was, I always put it down to the colouring, but it's flat and dull.

Not sure what he's doing now.

He's style looks like old Dougie Brathwaite stuff, who, funnily enough, has gotten so much better since his early Marvel UK days.
 
 
DavidXBrunt
09:23 / 13.09.04
Steve Yeowell is one of my favourite artists. He's quite possible THE artist for me. But I disagree that his art has declined. It's changed, I'll give you that but not declined. I think it's a more deliberate thing than that, a change of style for each story.

I have a gorgeous sketch of Eddie MacPhail he did at the end of 2002 and it's just perfect. It could have come straight out of book 1. He can do that style when he wants, I just think he doesn't always want to.

Cerainly his art on the Devlin Waugh Mega-Epic he drew for 2k at the turn of the century was full of energy and grand designs and his swashbuckling work on Red Seas more recently has been some of the best I've ever seen. If I could link artwork to prove my point I would.

Of course, it's horses for courses. I like the new style. But I am also aware that my opinion on this will be easily dismissed because people think I'm a 2k staffer or just here to hype the comic. But that's not the case. I am genuinley as impressed by Steve's work as I ever have been.

Here's some linky things to recent stuff. The first two from the second Red Seas, the third from the first.

http://www.2000adonline.com/images/artwork/idols4_medium.jpg


http://www.2000adonline.com/images/artwork/idols7_medium.jpg

http://www.2000adonline.com/images/artwork/redsea1_medium.jpg
 
 
_Boboss
09:43 / 13.09.04
i dunno about the phase 4 art either - granted it's possible i was too young to form a beard-wearing opinion, but the blocks of colour make it look like an issue of smash hits don't they? it wasn't as good as the kylie video, but it was cool. (archie was pink.) it wasn't like this was yeowell's first coloured art after all - red razors had used an entirely different colour/seps process, but the computer-assist in phase iv was there to produce a certain effect.
 
 
_Boboss
09:46 / 13.09.04
sorry k, not to dig or owt, but 'barely recognisable from a line-up' - i just don't get that. the panel in question, fact all his work on invisibles book three, just looks like the great steve yeowell to me.
 
 
miss wonderstarr
10:52 / 13.09.04
Hey I am not going to take any disagreement as a dig. It is open to question. Just because I spent most of Sunday evening prepping this thread doesn't mean my opinion is any more valid!

I hope it comes across that I'm a major fan of at least some Yeowell work so am not trying to hack the man down. If you think he hasn't shown a downturn in effort or energy, who am I to say you're wrong; I hope my little offering will provoke some interesting discussion.
 
 
_Boboss
11:07 / 13.09.04
yeah i like the thread. i think it's possibly all about the exit wounds with yeowell - he does that 'lone arc of brain and blood leaping from the back of the skull' thing really well. the bit where king mob shoots the guy in the back of the head and his whole face sort of flaps open - that bit's great that. i'd probably like to see a bit more of the yeowell from zenith iii - the billy-whizz running across a broken city while siouxsie sioux watches, the mambamobile, the whole scrap in the middle of london.

yeah, exit wounds and action: for such a 'nice-looking' kind of artist it's when he gets grisly he gets great.
 
 
Benny the Ball
11:18 / 13.09.04
The invisibles 'Entropy in the UK' image above looks more like Ian Gibson than Steve Yeowell. I always read his changing style's as matching the story though, especially with Zenith, i - simple, ii (like old War or Battle stories) - dark, iii - bleak, iv - least clear memories of this one, but sort of wrapped around on itself and was more about the internal changes of Zenith and St Claire, wasn't it? Really can't remember it too clearly, just didn't like the added colour as it didn't sit right with Zenith (even the colour covers didn't sit right with me for some reason) ends with a crystal pyramid or something doesn't it?
 
 
miss wonderstarr
14:08 / 13.09.04
When I get round to my "Why Zenith IV Sucked" thread, all its mysteries will be revealed.
 
 
Haus of Mystery
14:09 / 13.09.04
Gotta agree that Phase III was his crowning glory. Never been better.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
18:20 / 13.09.04
I've still got very fond memories of Zenith IV, hazy though they are - I'm not even sure if I ever bought the relevant progs, or just read them in the newsagents, but either way, I don't have them now, so I look forward to the thread with innarest.

As far as Steve Yeowell goes though, it does seem a shame that he's dropped off the radar, as far as I know. I never pay much attention to the art in comics, to be honest, unless it's particularly ravishing, or not-to-my-taste, ( I don't think I've ever bought anything on the basis of who drew it, I'm afraid,) but I'd definitely put Jill Thompson's work on The Invisibles in the latter category. Quite apart from anything else, it did seem to jar with the tone of the series, which might have been better served if Yeowell had done the whole of book one. Whether this was part of the original " hypersigil " idea, or whether it was to do with deadlines and so on I don't know, but unlike say Neil Gaiman, George's ( *I'm free !* ) writing does seem to need an artist who's sympitacio ( sic, possibly, ) and so should possibly have looked after Yeowell a bit better. At least, I can't say I'd honestly submit anything other than sub-standard work if I was asked to turn in two or three pages at the end of a series I'd helped to define, really.

Honestly, would the Invisibles have been anything other than hugely improved under the following circumstances ?

Yeowell on the first bit, Jimenez on the second, and Phil Bond on the third ?
 
 
miss wonderstarr
19:03 / 13.09.04
I've said it before and it's still plenty true that Morrison, one of the most commercially important and critically acclaimed writers in the West, has been saddled with artists well below what he deserves surprisingly often. A lot of The Invisibles involves a struggle to get past the mediocre-to-awful artwork and engage with the ideas, characterisation and dialogue; a lot of JLA has some astonishingly ignorant, incompetent drawing dressed up with computer effects. Animal Man, is, likewise, crippled by ugly and primitive art for the most part, just without the fancy colours; and so is Doom Patrol as we wait for Richard Case to improve on the job. He does so, but if you check out the early numbers from #19 onward, his work is amateurishly nasty.

Chris Weston's art on The Filth might be to some tastes but frankly, Grant Morrison can draw better than him, which is a pretty damning comparison. Surely an author shouldn't have his work brought to visual life by people who draw less well than him. OK, so Morrison clearly rates Weston's work and wanted that style so it's perhaps not as good an example as the others. But I maintain it's a shame that a writer with such ideas often has them blocked and obscured by a lack of creative ability on the part of his artist.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
19:33 / 13.09.04
Well ok, but for the sake of argument then K, who would you have had drawing The Filth ?
 
 
Gary Lactus
20:48 / 13.09.04
this is runce-wedding

Hmmm, I loved Weston on The Filth (while I thought, as I still do, that he sucked on The Invisibles). His Jimenez-gone-wrong (or Jimenez-w/-lumpy heads) visual style really worked for The Filth. It was septic; rotted glamour; Hollywood w/ skin - it was perfect. It really resonated.

A nice clean style would of sucked.

And w/ Doom Patrol I've got to admit I have no distance, but I think the art was pretty much fine. It was 4 colour super-heroes via Jan Svankmejer, just as Watchmen was 4 colour super-heroes via realistic beards before it, and, again, the art worked precisely because it underlined that fact.

Time felt really soft and permeable around that windmill. Just like Jill's lines.

Art is VITAL to a comic, and it needs to do more than just look pretty and be easy to read. It has to feed into the words, the atmosphere, the themes. It has to be appropriate to the book. I'm pretty sure the art in the examples given above achieves that goal.
 
 
PatrickMM
20:58 / 13.09.04
Kovacs, I completely agree. I think the biggest reason that Moore hasn't got as much respect as Alan Moore (the only comprable figure) is that the art on his books has been consistently screwed up in one way or another. Virtually all of Moore's books have had one really strong artist, who completely defined the look of the project. JH Williams on Promethea, Totelben on Miracleman, Eddie Campbell on From Hell, they were critical to defining the books.

Morrison on the other hand gets screwed at the end of The Invisibles, on Animal Man, and most of all on New X-Men. Those Igor Kordey issues in Empire were disgusting. If Quitely had done the entire run, the critical respect for it would go up exponentially, but of course, we'd probably only be about 20 issues in. More realistically, I'd have loved to see Jiminez do the entire thing.

It's ironic because Morrison works with some of the best artists in the business, and on the works where he has a single artist (Kill Your Boyfriend, Flex) he gets a ton of respect, it's just these type of works don't happen enough.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
21:30 / 13.09.04
PatrickMM - deny this if you like, but Alan Moore got totally fucked up the hairstyle by some of the later episodes of " Miracleman. "
 
 
miss wonderstarr
22:51 / 13.09.04
Yeah, Quitely would have been good on The Filth perhaps. I mean, he'd be good for pretty much anything but he is strong on really solid, fleshy, slobby, real-world stuff like in Flex.

I think the real-world material works best in The Filth as it stands anyway... the first few pages, for instance, are fantastic in their grimy detail. But as I argued (in detail but without any response!) on the thread dedicated to that title, it's Weston's fantastical, large-scale splash pages that really offend my taste.
 
 
Alex's Grandma
00:08 / 14.09.04
I am now so angry I can barely see straight, following the above comments. I can feel the purple cords bursting, the white shirt ripping, and my hands... my hands turning green... I can... No longer... Control... the, er... RRRAGHH ! SSMMASSSH !
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
07:37 / 14.09.04
Morrison on the other hand gets screwed at the end of The Invisibles, on Animal Man, and most of all on New X-Men.

Hmmm.. but isn't that effect as much as cause? Morrison occupies a different niche to Moore - you probably wouldn't get Moore to do "New X-Men", and, while you might get Morrison doing Promethea, I suspect it would be too long-term and insufficiently remunerative. If you are doing a series for a big superhero comics company, you expect stuff like different storylines having different artists, fill-in artists and so on. The Sandman had a whole passle of different artists, to compare...

The other possibility, of course, is that in general Grant Morrison just likes writing for "unpopular" artists, Quitely, Jiminez and Cameron aside. I mean, how upset was he about having Jill T., for example? I just don't know...
 
 
Ganesh
17:19 / 14.09.04
Chris Weston's art on The Filth might be to some tastes but frankly, Grant Morrison can draw better than him, which is a pretty damning comparison.

I think that's slightly unfair. Weston's stuff is, arguably, ugly (and icky) - but IMHO this made him the perfect choice to draw The Filth.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
18:05 / 14.09.04
I've never been that into Yeowell, but my favorite art by him is the stuff in the first few issues of Invisibles. I don't mind the stuff inked by Giordano, honestly.
 
 
PatrickMM
23:04 / 14.09.04
Hmmm.. but isn't that effect as much as cause? Morrison occupies a different niche to Moore - you probably wouldn't get Moore to do "New X-Men", and, while you might get Morrison doing Promethea, I suspect it would be too long-term and insufficiently remunerative. If you are doing a series for a big superhero comics company, you expect stuff like different storylines having different artists, fill-in artists and so on. The Sandman had a whole passle of different artists, to compare...

That's true, and on stuff like Supreme, Moore didn't have the same quality of artistic collaboration than he has on most of his oher stuff. I guess the main thing is Marvel needs to publish an issue of New X-Men every month, whereas Moore can publish Promethea whenever he wants, and hence, there's less of the editorial pressure that results in the artist switch.

The problem for me is that when GM does something like New X-Men, it's a much more serious work than most of Moore's corporate work, hence the lack a quality, consistent artist is disappointing.

The other possibility, of course, is that in general Grant Morrison just likes writing for "unpopular" artists, Quitely, Jiminez and Cameron aside. I mean, how upset was he about having Jill T., for example? I just don't know...

Personally, I love Weston, and was thrilled with his work on The Filth. I think he was the best artist (other than Quitely) in all of Invis, though that may have been do the story content he was working with. However, I could see your point on a lot of his earlier work, like JLA and Animal Man, which had competent, but uninspiring art.
 
 
PatrickMM
23:08 / 14.09.04
PatrickMM - deny this if you like, but Alan Moore got totally fucked up the hairstyle by some of the later episodes of " Miracleman. "

As much as I like the art I can't deny that. Miraclewoman looks like a female Dolph Lundgren. It's sad when her 50s hairstyle dates better than what Totelben drew, but at least the bad hair is drawn in pointilist style.
 
 
The Falcon
00:57 / 15.09.04
I really like Steve Yeowell, but I think the latter end of vol.1 by him and Giordano is appalling. Series-worst.

Am I correct in blaming the latter?
 
 
yawn - thing's buddy
13:46 / 06.12.05
yes.

and

no.

yeowell smoke-signalled those pages in.

giordano was about as bad a fit for that arc as could have been fut. (fat?)
 
 
Alex's Grandma
14:13 / 06.12.05
I still think this was an excellent photo essay by Kovaks.

However, I'm less sure about 'other peoples' decision to hit the electric soup first thing this morning.
 
 
yawn - thing's buddy
14:47 / 06.12.05
less sure?

wanker.

sure of it.
 
 
Johnny fighters
12:06 / 07.12.05
Get the impression this is going to be a really unpopular view but I hated Jimenez on the Invisibles. His style worked really well for the Gideon Stargrave sequences where everything is totally over the top and looks sort of frozen in time, but when he became the main artist of vol 2 it was horrible - really 'realistic' in a nasty boring way. It was such a relief when Weston turned up for that stand-in issue set back in the twenties (think he was credited as Space Boy or something)- his work was similarly detailed but had so much more wieght and atmosphere.

Back to Yeowell, one of my favourite comic artists and I like his work on Phase IV, but III is definitely his highpoint. Last time I saw his stuff he seemd to have forgotten how to draw ears.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply