|
|
I'm enjoying quite a few tracks from Kala at the moment, The Turn being my current favourite.
Moreover, I think a lot of the theoretical/cultural/ideological complaints thrown at MIA, particularly by Simon Reynolds with his strange "no substance" argument*, kind of fall down when you consider that she was willing to come out with the line: "like PLO I don't surrender".
Mentioning, supporting, the Palestinian struggle in a pop song is classic - in this case particularly for it's literalness, it's specificity, and it's association of the artist with the people who are struggling, whereas methinks your classic white, "socially conscious" band (Rage Against the Machine, perhaps) are for more likely to throw out an easy, fluffy abstract line about "the system" being "bad", at which they get fawned over/held up as messiahs/get a huge gimmick etc.
I have to say, M.I.A.'s lyrics do grate on me occasionally, that P.L.O line in particular. I don't know much about Simon Reynolds' criticisms of her, but I can;t really see how that line is indicative of 'substance' - in fact it seem pretty 'fluffy' and 'easy' to me, brushing up against an incredibly complex political situation and name-checking what has become a fairly dodgy organisation (which is not the same as 'the Palestinian people', by a long shot). I guess I just don't think that that's a particularly 'difficult' line to come out with, and whatever it gains with its literalness it loses with its naivety (not sure that's quite the word I'm looking for though...).
Its interesting that you're chosing Rage Against the Machine as your "white 'socially conscious'" band, given that - as I recall - at least 50% of the band are not white? Not that I'm a fan, but their lyrics are frequently make equally specific (and sometimes equally dodgy) references to the ones you find in M.I.A. Of course, they're much less exciting musically, but it seems like you're setting up a comparison between 'good' political music that you like, and 'bad' political music which you don't, without giving any real criteria for the distinction beyond your own aesthetic tastes. |
|
|