BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Body modification/Magick?

 
  

Page: (1)2

 
 
Joetheneophyte
14:08 / 06.09.04
Has anybody on here ever used Magick or Magickal practices to attempt changes to their body:

ie

healing

body modification

for example, i have a bad shoulder at the moment, resulting from a fall more than ten years ago. I have several magical ideas that might help

Has anybody any experience of healing or other body modifications that have been successful via magick?

Success stories would be welcome

have you regrown hair, got bigger boobs (I believe Hypnosis can achieve increase in boob size and some claim penis size but I have not read ANYTHING that has corroborated the latter(penis))

Anybody anything they would care to share, ie methods, stories ancdotes ...whatever
 
 
--
14:40 / 06.09.04
Not really, but the bigger boobs thing sounds enticing...
 
 
*
20:23 / 06.09.04
I know some gender variant people who claim to have adjusted their hormone levels through will, producing secondary appearance-related effects. Magic/k, biofeedback, same diff. I might embark on a similar experiment, but I suspect it would be one of those looong, slooow, boring to read about things.

Healing, on the other hand, is well within my experience. But you might try acupuncture for a jumpstart, if you haven't already. Tai chi and chi gung are related disciplines which work very well as an adjunct to any healing-related magic.
 
 
· N · E · T ·
20:40 / 06.09.04
Hi Joe,

I had four mutha****in' wisdom teeth cut out mah jaw a few months ago and used a combination of magick and self-hypnosis to heal from it.

It was so successful that within 24 hours of surgery I didn't need any painkillers...
 
 
Nietzsch E. Coyote
23:39 / 06.09.04
I was thinking about doing the opposite. Using body mods to do magick.
 
 
Joetheneophyte
06:21 / 07.09.04
Hi again

yeah the bigger boobs thing is allegedly possible

I initially read about it in a book by Vernon Coleman called 'Body Power'

I read some other links on Hypnosis boards that basically outlined the procedure

The client is encouraged to learn self hypnosis and then imagine warmth, such as a warm towel draped over their breasts and imagine pulsations from all over their body, into their breasts
Allegedly the increased blood flow, promotes tissue growth

This has to be kept up for several weeks before results are noticable. Allegedly, between .5 and 1.5 of an inch increase can be obtained and even more impressive, uneven breasts can be made more symmetrical as a result

penis augmentation cannot or to date has not been made using these techniques. Why I cannot say and from the literature I have read, no explanation has been offered

As for healing. I have read that Grant Morrison, utilises such methods. He has gone on record to state that he has used laying on of hands such as faith healing and Sigils, for healing

This is an area I am very interested in and I would be most interested to hear any success stories, regarding this

Thanks for the input to date
 
 
illmatic
08:01 / 07.09.04
If you want bigger boobs, Joe, just go silicon, I did and I've never looked back. The op is quick and painless, and the attention I get when I'm out! You wouldn't believe it!

Of course, I plan to have them taken out when I have kids.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:53 / 07.09.04
Is there any *actual* evidence supporting this breast growth, Joe? Only quite a lot of blood runs through my arms, and I don't see them growing all the time... this may not be wishful thinking, but I'm not convinced by the pseudoscience - vascularity stimulates tissue *regrowth*, but sudden creation of what is primarily fat? Me no sure...
 
 
_Boboss
11:36 / 07.09.04
i can make my cock grow, just by tuning my thoughts to dirty.
 
 
· N · E · T ·
18:47 / 07.09.04
There is a great deal of evidence supporting the use of hypnosis to alter the size of breasts...

Barber, T. X. (1984). Changing unchangeable bodily processes by (hypnotic) suggestions: A new look a hypnosis, cognitions, imagining, and the mind-body problem. Advances, 1(2), 7-40
"
"The Psychobiology of Mind-Body Healing" - By Ernest Lawrence Rossi

"My Voice Will Go With You: The Teaching Tales of Milton H. Erickson" - By Sidney Rosen

Williams, J. (1974). Stimulation of breast growth by hypnosis. Journal of Sex Research, 10 316-326

And that's just the tip of the iceberg... It's quite well established actually.
 
 
LykeX
19:33 / 07.09.04
The obvious reason, from my point of view, why suh techniques could work with enlarging the breasts , but not the penis is, like Haus touches upon, that the growth of breasts is mostly due to deposits of fat.
The penis, however, cannot be enlarged by deposits of fat, at least not in any way you would want it to.

I can buy the stimulation of breast growth by hypnosis, but I have to ask, hasn't anyone thought a little bit beyond such simple things? What about facial reconstruction? Modification of fingerprints or irises? Immediate gender switching? What I mean is, if you're going to bet, why not go for the big bucks.
Have any of you heard of any such attempts? Or have you tried yourself? That's the kind of thing that would be interesting, although I admit I have no idea of how to go about it.
One more item to my list of interesting subjects.
 
 
Joetheneophyte
06:12 / 08.09.04
thanks netaungrot. Whilst I have never seen anything physical corroborating hypnotic breast augmentation, I have enough respect for some of the claimants (most notably Rossi, who in my humble opinion is a genius)

You supplied info that I would have had great difficulty in obtaining as I am living at my parents at the moment and most of my literature is still at my previous address.

Anybody had any success with healing?

My shoulder is giving me some 'jip' at the moment and I am musing over attempting some Magickal workings / Sigils etc for general wellbeing and posture improvement. I have obtained relief via more traditional methods in the past, most notably a good Osteopath but unfortunately at the moment, this is financially difficult.
 
 
Joetheneophyte
06:33 / 08.09.04
LykeX.........if you go to hypnosis boards, you will see loads of adverts for hypnotic penis growth, hair regrowth....even claims that you can make yourself taller

Personally, I think that these are overblown claims and whilst I can accept that there is a chance that 1 in a million people might be able to in a tiny way, achieve these results, they are far from replicable and certainly NOT from a CD that contains suggestions or subliminals

I think that a really good hypnotist like Ernest Rossi or some of the better NLP practitioners, might be able to affect the body in ways that defy traditional medical thinking but the number of people actually skilled enough to do this is comparatively small and there are vastly more charlatans out there, making ridiculous claims. This is sad as they are preying on the vulnerable and worse, making scientific investigation an area that most respectable investigators are wary of pursuing due to the stigma attached

Rossi and Cheeks 'Mind Body Therapy' is a great book and to my admittedly unscientific eyes, seems to contain enough hard science and impressive theorising to satisfy me that they know what they are talking about, though obviously, not having any scientific training or discipline, this is conjecture on my part

I am strange, I believe in hypnosis and do actually believe that it has loads of untapped potential but to date, I have not seen anything concrete to keep this belief intact and most of the hypnotists I have met or attended have disappointed me in the long run. As for Hypnosis tapes, besides as a relaxation aid, I think they are generally of limited use and a poor substitute for hypnotherapy


just my opinion
 
 
illmatic
09:40 / 08.09.04
Actually, according to letters to Kenneth Grant (contained in Zos Speaks) Spare had some magical success with making his wang bigger. He states that it took him three days to figure out how to get it back to normal size.

Joe, I nominate you to try and emulate his experiments. Go for it, man!
 
 
Joetheneophyte
09:50 / 08.09.04


and boy do I need it!


I wonder why Spare wanted it to go back to normal size?

just how big did he get it?

 
 
illmatic
10:10 / 08.09.04
He said, and I quote, "you couldn't get a pound note around it" - sounds a bit ouchie, doesn't it. Especially for your partner.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:08 / 08.09.04
Bear in mind also that pound notes were a lot bigger back then...
 
 
Joetheneophyte
11:57 / 08.09.04
:0


ANY SPARE CHANGE MATE?
 
 
Joetheneophyte
14:01 / 08.09.04
I've just remembered how big one of those old pound notes were


OW!!!!!!!!!!!


that is scarey. The more I hear about Spare, the more intriguing he seems. Never heard that story about him before.
Wonder how he did it?

I have heard he used an earthenware receptacle that he fitted over his phallus when conjuring thought forms. I hope he never got the two operations mixed up or it could have been very painful!

All joking aside, this is some pretty powerful stuff here. Presumably he was able to get a part of his body to react and expand very quickly and take on mass or generate cell growth at a terrific rate. That is extraordinary in itself

he must have been like a Magickal Bruce Banner

That is even more impressive than the stories I have heard about his paintings 'coming to life ' and him making it rain


excellent stuff
 
 
illmatic
14:44 / 08.09.04
Well, just 'cos he said it doesn't mean it's true ...I adopt "I'll believe when I've seen it" attitude with most of that stuff. With Spare, I think it's definitely true that a bit of a mythology has been woven round him by Kenneh Grant, amongst others - a lot of the stories Grant reports aren't found in Spare's work - but then again, he did know Spare first hand.
 
 
Joetheneophyte
15:42 / 08.09.04
What's Mr Grant like?

Is he just an armchair theorist or does anybody know whether he can walk the walk, so to speak

I have no knowledge of him but I do know that if I talking to somebody who could make their body do these wonderous things, I would be desperate for them to teach me how to do it or at least point me in the right direction


Spare himself didn't seem overly bothered with fame or fortune. Mr Grant I have no idea but my first thought would be

"well can you do it then?"
 
 
MrKismet
18:27 / 10.09.04
Men: I certainly sympathize with the desire to enlarge one's penis but, PLEASE --- stay away from pumps!
 
 
LykeX
01:11 / 11.09.04
I don't know, is a penis pump considered a magic weapon? As in chalice, lamp, sword and pump?
 
 
Lord Morgue
01:23 / 11.09.04
I've managed to make my own breasts achieve a respectable size, by the ritual of eating too much junk food and sitting here talking to you guys instead of exersising.
As for pumps- only if they match the handbag.
 
 
Joetheneophyte
06:50 / 13.09.04



my arse has grown using the same tried and tested methodology

great line about the pumps!
 
 
Joetheneophyte
18:27 / 13.09.04
I'm on my computer at home (long story but suffice to say, I now have very limted access) so for once I can expand upon an idea I have had before and that I wanted to discuss

LykeX brought up an interesting point


He/She mentioned that we should effectively reach for the stars and attempt facial reconstruction and other major changes in body modification via magick

Now I am versed enough in Hypnosis methodology to know that this is not achievable via hypnotic practices or I should say, there are those that claim they can affect such massive changes but that their claims are at worst unscientific and at best unable to be replicated

Hypnosis (from anecdotal evidence) has achieved breast enlargement......has speeded up healing and to my knowledge, has been able to promote a better immune system response

Where the most outrageous claims have been made are in areas such as hair re-growth, bone elongation and penis augmentation
Personally, I am not convinced about ANY of these claims

It is not that I believe these achievements are impossible, just improbable and statistically far too small an occurrence to make much headway both scientifically or pragmatically. I believe that the Richard Bandler's and Robert Dilts' of this world might be able to achieve this in some circumstances (and yes I know Bandler is a self promoting lunatic but he has had some very good ideas that cannot be discounted due to his other less salubrious behaviour)




Now whether Magick or Magickal methods could achieve where Hypnosis has to date lacked replicable results, I do not know. It is concievable that Magick somehow taps either

a: a deeper level of the MIND than Hypnosis

b: Magick calls upon powers beyond our individual hidden depths, and as such is able to achieve more impressive results

c: neither of the above

d: a and b above

e: something else altogether
---------------------------------------------------
I have no idea

all I can say is that if we accept that Hypnosis and Magick both tap into a deeper part of the psyche (and I accept Donald Michael Kraig's opinion that Magick is both part of the Psyche and somethijng else, altogether) then it is concievable that BELIEF plays a big part in this issue

For example, years ago, I read a book about Hypnosis that detailed how a British hospital doctor was able to achieve fantastic results with (forgive the spelling) 'Ichiosis '

This condition is a thickening on the arms and legs and basically the skin grows in armour like platelets on the sufferers skin. The doctor was able to achieve massive reductions in the patients platelets.........via hypnotic methods. The doctor was still in training and was told by his superiors that this condition was untreatable

On being told this, he was never again able to achieve similar results with either this patient or any other of his patients

Now this raises some interesting points

Was the patient able to sense the doctors new attitude and lack of belief in what was possible?

Did the doctor convey a lack of belief that sabotaged the treatment?

Now tha Magick practitioner might be faced with a similar dilemmna


IF the practitioner believes that something is achievable, then presumbaly the success rate would be higher. some kind of critical observer part of the psyche might be bypassed and the healing/adaptive powers of the brain/mind/body might be accessible and do their work

Hypnosis might be able to allow us to tap these hidden depths but there is still a glass ceiling that prevents or to date has prevented us from reaching more successful and impressive results. Magick might bypass this critical component or at least allow deeper probing. Magick might simply allow us to bypass this critical observer by on some level, accepting that wea re calling upon a hidden force....rather than the hypnotic paradigm that we are dealing with our subjective unconscious

By using Magick, we might be excusing ourselves for a change in behaviour or new ability that we somehow consciously will not allow. i know this is all rubbish conjecture and not articulated very well but I hope you get what I am trying to get at

basically, Hypnosis might allow us certain behaviour, belief and even body adaptation possibilities BUT as humans and developed personalities....we might not allow full access to our hidden powers.
In comparison Magick, can achieve more impressive results as it either:
DOES have an objective as well as subjective effect, so controls things beyond our control ......... such as others and the environment

Or it allows us the excuse we need to blame or reach levels of being and powers that we consciously cap or keep repressed



For example, Donald Michael Kraig has said that he always suggests a divination before any Sigils are used. Maybe (and I have his email somewhere and when time allows I might ask this lovely man.....name dropper aren't I )

anyway, maybe Sigils reach a level deeper than the psyche, or even a level that is less subjective. Therefore the karmic ramifications or potential for psychic disintergration, might be more 'risky' than in normal hypnosis. It might be too forceful for a rocky personality to attempt too big a change, without thought of the ramifications

Now I know that Sigils are not infallible but maybe they bypass this critical observer more easily than hypnotic suggestion and as such, need to be treated more respectfully than Hypnosis.
I have no idea, and this whole post is just me idly musing and new ideas are coming to me as I type

As for body modification, Christopher Hyatt
details how body modification, most notably weight control can be achieved via Masturbation and imagining the idealised self (hunt out a copy of 'Tantra Without Tears ' for a more detailed explanation......Hyatt has received a bad press on here and I am not qualified enough to say whether he is great or average)

I don't know, this is something that I am very interested in. To date, I do not believe that anybody has achieved more than a millimeter or two in height gain, via hypnosis

Magick I cannot comment upon though Austin Spare seems to (allegedly) have been able to morph and adapt his body or attributes as he chose. I thank everybody who has contributed to date and please forgive any glaringly stupid points I have made in this thread.....I am just typing as I think and I am sure I will regret a lot of this drivel tomorrow

I am going to start a similar thread about Mental modification next ....if anybody chooses to join in, please feel free and your opiniokns are more than welcome
 
 
Ganesh
18:47 / 13.09.04
There is a great deal of evidence supporting the use of hypnosis to alter the size of breasts...

Barber, T. X. (1984). Changing unchangeable bodily processes by (hypnotic) suggestions: A new look a hypnosis, cognitions, imagining, and the mind-body problem. Advances, 1(2), 7-40
"
"The Psychobiology of Mind-Body Healing" - By Ernest Lawrence Rossi

"My Voice Will Go With You: The Teaching Tales of Milton H. Erickson" - By Sidney Rosen

Williams, J. (1974). Stimulation of breast growth by hypnosis. Journal of Sex Research, 10 316-326

And that's just the tip of the iceberg... It's quite well established actually.


I'm having trouble tracking down details of the actual research methodology on most of these. So far, the abstracts I have seen have tended to be marred by fairly obvious flaws (Williams' 1974 study, for example, uses a self-selecting group of 13 volunteers - a sample size far too small to produce statistically significant results - and, as far as I can see, no control group), most commonly insufficient sample size and no 'blinding' (I appreciate double-blinding would be near-impossible...).

Can anyone link to details of the relevant studies themselves?
 
 
Joetheneophyte
19:04 / 13.09.04
sorry ....way beyond my meagre intellectual capabilities or resource material

Ganesh, if you get a chance, please read Mind Body Therapy by Cheek and Rossi

to me, it is a mighty impressive book. To your medically trained mind, it may seem vacuous and unscientific....I would love to know your opinion of it, if you ever get the chance to read it. I am not used to reading medical or research papers and I did struggle with aspects of this book. I thought they looked scientific enough but obviously, I am not qualified to offer a proper opinion

the ISBN number is 0-393-31247-x for the book

My first exposure to breast enlargement via hynotic methods was an article by Dr Vernon Coleman in a newspaper when I was a kid. As a result, I obtained a copy of BODYPOWER ....a book where he detailed very briefly, related disciplines such as Hypnosis....Autogenic Training and a myriad of other complentary and alternative therapies. I wanted to believe the claims in said article and as I got older, I read similar claims from more scientific sounding individuals....culminating in Mind Body Therapy by Dr David Cheek (MD) and Dr Rossi (Phd)

Rossi is not a medical doctor but I (from my limited standpoint), believe he is borderline genius

a Doctoral level psychologist who sidelines as a mathematician.....clever, clever guy
 
 
Ganesh
19:38 / 13.09.04
I've read articles of Rossi's and, far from being "vacuous" I've actually found them rather dense - but yes, compelling indeed. He's certainly excellent at pulling everything together into unifying hypotheses and forwarding plausible physiological mechanisms.

My problem, as I say, is that the actual studies themselves, on which the various hypotheses (and, in the many cases, commercial claims) are based, appear deeply unsound, in terms of methodology. Which is frustrating...
 
 
Joetheneophyte
20:05 / 13.09.04
I am glad that you concur with my opinion of Rossi's work

I go all misty eyed when I read hard scientific stuff....my brain fogs over, so to hear that you also find his work interesting is heartening

I don't think for one minute that Rossi is vacuous but I know my own limitations (sometimes ) so I realise that I am hardly qualified to offer a valid or qualified opinion
To read that you too find his work of merit, makes me feel a bit better about the validity of my own opinions

Not trying to be over fawning or anything but by the nature of your profession, I know you must be at least competent, if not excellent in studying analytical studies and scientific data

I go blank and cannot motivate or get past my inherent laziness to do such hard work
 
 
Ganesh
22:42 / 13.09.04
Not trying to be over fawning or anything but by the nature of your profession, I know you must be at least competent, if not excellent in studying analytical studies and scientific data

Competent, maybe. Doctors are now trained in critical reading - evaluating research in terms of its methodological soundness - but I've never found it easy, particularly. The stuff of Rossi's I've read is, as I say, densely-packed; a whole lot of it goes over my head too.
 
 
· N · E · T ·
23:10 / 13.09.04
My problem, as I say, is that the actual studies themselves, on which the various hypotheses (and, in the many cases, commercial claims) are based, appear deeply unsound, in terms of methodology.

Besides the 1974 Williams study, what have you read ?

I haven't been able to locate any studies published on the internet, however, if you so desired, I'm sure some universities at which such research has been conducted have sufficent records to quell your skepticism.

Here are more studies for you to track down:

Staib, A.R., and Logan, D.R., Hypnotic Stimulation of Breast Growth. "The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis," 1977, 4:201-208

Willard, R. D., Breast enlargement through visual imagery and hypnosis. "The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis," 1977, 4:195-200.

Peter H.C. Mutke at UCLA, 1971

You also might give the nice people at American Pacific University a call, toll free at: (888)577-9278 or (808)596-7765, or by fax at (808)596-7764. They'll be there 8am - 5pm Hawaii time.
 
 
Ganesh
23:49 / 13.09.04
Besides the 1974 Williams study, what have you read ?

I haven't read the Williams study, merely seen an online abstract detailing the sample size, the fact that they were "volunteers", the lack of a control group and no mention of any sort of 'blinding'.

There's very little available online in terms of methodology and, as far as I can see, no complete studies. Other than Williams, I've found a very brief summary of Staib & Logan's 1977 attempt to replicate his findings: it gives impressive-sounding results (including reduction in waist size) but nothing at all on methodology, not even sample size. I've seen a similarly sketchy summary of Willard's 1977 study, which apparently sampled 22 women (another statistically too-small number, nothing on selection/randomisation and no apparent control group or 'blinding')

I haven't been able to locate any studies published on the internet, however, if you so desired, I'm sure some universities at which such research has been conducted have sufficent records to quell your skepticism.

Possibly - although much of the research appears to date back to the 1970s, when methods were perhaps a little less rigorously applied... But, as you say, even one good, methodologically sound study would help.

Here are more studies for you to track down:

Staib, A.R., and Logan, D.R., Hypnotic Stimulation of Breast Growth. "The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis," 1977, 4:201-208

Willard, R. D., Breast enlargement through visual imagery and hypnosis. "The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis," 1977, 4:195-200.


Mentioned above.

Peter H.C. Mutke at UCLA, 1971

I'll keep looking for this one.

You also might give the nice people at American Pacific University a call, toll free at: (888)577-9278 or (808)596-7765, or by fax at (808)596-7764. They'll be there 8am - 5pm Hawaii time.

Erm, until I've a better idea what I'm looking for, I'm a little reluctant to pass on my professional name in connection with a general 'wanting to know about tit enlargement through hypnosis' enquiry. I might try to track down the paper journals, though.
 
 
Ganesh
00:02 / 14.09.04
This is pretty much the most up-to-date summary I can find:

Research spanning decades:

- 1971, February 28. - Peter H.C. Mutke, M.D. Presented his results to the "Department of Neuropsychiatry," University of California, Los Angeles.

- 1974 - James E. Williams reported breast enhancement through hypnosis - "Journal of Sex Research". Out of thirteen volunteers they averaged increases of over 2 inches in the circumference of their breasts (2 cup sizes).

- 1975 R.D. Willard of 'The Institute of Behaviour and Mind Sciences' claimed results of 85% from a 12 week study showed breast enlargement, correctness of lopsidedness and increases in firmness.

- 1977, Staib, A.R., and Logan, D.R.. - Hypnotic Stimulation of Breast Growth. "The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis".

- 1977, Dr Willard. -"The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis," achieved an average 1.44 inch increase in breast size for his 22 volunteers- Every single volunteer who did the study with one breast smaller than the other found them to be equal in size at the end of the twelve weeks.

- 1979, Wilson, Donald L. MD, - "Total Mind Power" book- documenting breast enhancement hypnosis with very impressive results.

- 1997, Dr Roy Beran, a neurologist at the 'Adelaide Childrens Hospital', reported his results at the National Convention of Hypnotherapists. He found success in increasing lopsidedness in female breasts by increasing the size of each breast by varing amounts.

- 1980 Dr Milton Erickson reported increasing the breast size of a teenage girl who had previous not gained success from hormones given to her by her Doctor.

- In a study of over 800 women 80% saw gains of over two inches.

- 2002 University of California was reported by BBC Television about their "great success" in breast enhancement research through hypnosis.


The latter two are intriguing, particularly the one with the sample-size of 800. Unfortunately, that's pretty much all I can find.

I'm certainly not disputing this as a possibility, and there do appear to be plausible physiological mechanisms. What hasn't been established (not online, anyway) is any methodologically credible evidence base. Which isn't, of course, to say that one doesn't exist. It does seem, however, that if good-quality large-scale, blinded case-control studies were available, the various 'grow your tits through hypnotism' websites would be quoting those rather than the poorer-quality semi-anecdotal stuff...
 
 
Lord Morgue
08:34 / 14.09.04
Joe Lewis, the pioneer kickboxer, has always used creative visualisation to help achieve his physique. Of course, he also trains like a motherfucker, but he is built like the shit, so there you go. Or not.
 
  

Page: (1)2

 
  
Add Your Reply