|
|
Still have to catch this one, but I'll admit severe disappointment at the first one. I guess it's just being spoiled by Pixar's unflappable pedigree. Shrek seems like it would be a funny comedy, regardless of whether it was animated on a computer or featured Mike Meyers in a suit. I'm not saying Dreamworks has no sense of art, design, or utilization of technology, but it sounds like it's a typical summer comedy with the requesite pop culture references and freeze frame jokes of anything snarky and animated.
Pixar's stuff, and I'll certainly include Nemo here, is just entirely different kind of filmmaking. They're making the kinds of timeless animated classics that Disney used to rock in the, what, forties? You can (and most like will) watch Toy Story 2 in three hundred years and still be floored by it ("Jessie's Song"? I dare you to not weep openly.), whereas, I'm wondering if you can get the same kind of milage out of Shrek 2. Naturually, like I said, DW doesn't really care about that and that's fine. Neither do audiences, as S2 made a huge huge huge amount of money. It's shown that animated films can be just as pop and of the moment as any other kind of comedy.
I certainly recommend Monsters Inc to watch, as it's such an above all hilarious movie. Billy Crystal is friggin' relevatory as Mike. And it's got the most maturely understated ending of any kids movie ever made. And the animation is flat out the best CG animation I've ever seen.
I'm glad that there's more than one game in town as far as CG Animation goes, but in the long run, I'll always love Pixar's stuff more. |
|
|