BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Stealing the stories of sidekicks

 
 
Ex
16:27 / 28.07.04
I've sprouted a desire to write something from the viewpoint of a secondary character in a (fairly, subculturally) famous book.

Firstly - any advice about how to tackle this? Anyone attempted something similar? I'm very fond of the original novel, and am aiming at a respectful but slightly dissenting response. I adore fanfiction so I don't see a glaring ethical problem, but still, I think it's a tricky area.

Which leads on to - legal issues. Any idea what kind of restrictions there might be on this? The original novel was published in 1929. I'm not planning on quoting from it, unless the estate are feeling very generous - but I will, of course, be nicking plot and characters. Ideally, I'd like to publish the end result.

Bring on the buckets of cold water and brickbats.
 
 
TeN
21:31 / 28.07.04
LEGAL ADVICE:
1929? Well, it's possible that the author has been dead for 50 years. If he is, that would make the work part of the public domain, eliminating all copyright restrictions and solving your problem. If not, I'd recomend writing a nice letter to him or his estate asking permission very nicely. If the answer, however, is no, then try changing some details - enough to make it obvious to anyone paying attention that this is the same character, but also provable that it's an entirely different character. Of course, you then run the risk not only of getting the author and/or his family pissed (not something you want to do to someone who's work you expect), but of diluting the original concept into a similar proximity. It might not even be possible - if the character is so minor, for instance, that changing almost any detail would make him/her unrecognizable. Then there is always the possibility of not publishing it until the original work enters the public domain, but you may not be willing to wait it out.

CREATIVE ADVICE:
Keep in mind that most of the people who will be reading this have already read the original, but know that some of them may have not - in other words don't tie it to the original plot too tightly, but be sure to make it similar enough that it will interest fans of the original. Inside jokes (ones known only by fans of the original work) are always good too. And try not to make it over the top - that's what turns me off about most fanfiction - they miss all the subtelties of the original and decide just to have every possible plot turn and monumental event happen all at once or right after another, which winds up being ridiculous and very off-putting. Also, make sure that you explore rocks left unturned by the author of the original, but don't try to make up answers to all his secrets - they're secrets for a reason.
 
 
Ex
14:02 / 29.07.04
It may be unseemly to be cheerful at someone's death but - YEEESSS! My esteemed author went in 1943! Thanks for that advice. I will scout a little more but that would seem to solve my largest problem.

The creative is handy also. The question of whether people have read it or not is really tricky - even though I think of it as an absolute bloody classic, and it had an incalculable impact, I don't know if many people have read it today, being as it is 500 pages of melodrama, violins, tosh and anthropomorphic domestic animals. I read it at 17, when my 'academic auntie' lent it to me: she said "You haven't read it?! You must read it! Oh God, but I can't lend it to you - I'd never forgive myself..." So for some people still clearly iconic. Others, no recognition at all.

To this end I will need to recruit some readers who haven't read it and some who have, to tell me if I've stuffed in too much of the original, or not enough to make a new stand-alone narrative.

they miss all the subtelties of the original

Relieved to report that the original has hardly any subtlety at all. I know, that doesn't let me off the hook... I will try not to make the minor character head off and found America/invent the atom bomb.
 
 
misterpc
08:21 / 30.07.04
if you're looking for precedents, somebody has done something very similar - George MacDonald Fraser with Flashman. Minor character from classic book, now a classic character in his own right. In fact, here's a recommendation - read the Flashman books, they're great!
 
 
Ex
13:25 / 30.07.04
I've read the first but hadn't ever tackled the original (Tom Browne's School Days?) so I don't know how well they hold up for a fan. But it held together as a narrative.

Flashman starts after the action of the original ends, which is simpler than what I was hoping to do - retell some of the original story also. Maybe I should leave well alone. I'm confused as to how to structure it (reading too much Atwood at the moment - narrator wanders round in present, doesn't do much, narrates huge chunks of past in extended flashback - I don't really want to do that...)
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
10:43 / 02.08.04
Word of warning - the UK copyright laws extend to 70 years after the death of the author.

I am very curious as to what your source is... am trying to guess but failing to get anything that sounds at all like it...
 
 
Tryphena Absent
11:39 / 02.08.04
To be fair that's only 9 years away. Write it and keep it in a draw.
 
 
Ex
14:00 / 02.08.04
Arse. Thank you. Yes, a bare nine years - and by the time I write it, edit it and hawk it round publishers it'll be less.

And Kit-Cat - it was originally published in 1928, I got it wrong. A splendid start to my respectful and informed dealings with the source text.
 
 
Jack Vincennes
15:01 / 02.08.04
am trying to guess but failing to get anything that sounds at all like it...

Me too, and the fact that my dissertation is being particularly recalcitrant just now means that I'm quite determined to find something meeting that description...

Ex, I think that since you want your work to be slightly dissenting anyway means that you'll avoid a lot of the problems TeN talked about; particularly the one about being over the top. Your original text also sounds like it'd take rather well to being reinterpreted (possibly the wrong word, I mean 'written about as fiction') too, which would also probably help.
 
 
electricinca
09:53 / 08.08.04
I have good news if the author died in 1943 and you are based in the UK. Current copyright duration is indeed 70 years after the author's death, but that was enacted in 1995. Before that point the duration was 50 years, so it became public domain in 1993
 
 
Ex
11:28 / 16.08.04
Rock! A shame for the lady in question, but a bunfight for your truly. Ta for that.
Now I just need information on daily life in Canada between the wars...
 
  
Add Your Reply