|
|
Tzaddi, the Star, the Emperor, etc.
The Hebrew letters are assigned to the various tarot trumps in the GD system (and therefore, by derivation, in Thelema as well) and the overall result of this is pretty much one for one attributions - except we place the Fool as 0, meaning Aleph (the first letter of the Hebrew alefbet) is assigned to the Fool - from there, Beth (2nd letter) is the Magician (Numbered 1) and so on. Which pretty elegantly lines up the 22 Hebrew letters with the 22 Trumps of the Tarot (and therefore the 22 paths on the Tree of Life).
This system handily aligns Tzaddi with the Star.
Now, Crowleys reception of the Book of The Law is where things get a bit tricky, containing as it does the lines "All these old letters of my Book are aright; but (Tzaddi) is not the Star. This also is secret: my prophet shall reveal it to the wise."
Crowley apparently took a while to work out what the deal was here, and eventually came to the conclusion that, for assorted reasons (primarily astrological, as best I understand) Tzaddi ought to be the Emperor, and He the Star.
This ultimately smooths out the association of the cards to the splitting of the Tetragrammaton (YHVH) into Father/Mother/Son/Daugher - as He is the letter for both Mother and Daughter, it doesn't 'feel' right to associate He with the Emperor, a card of Masculine authority.
However, if you look at the assignments of Hebrew letters to the Tree of Life, we find He connecting Chesed and Tiphareth. I personally find that a natural location for the Emperor, rather than for the Star. Tzaddi, on the other hand, connects Netzach and Yesod - a very reasonable place to assign the Star, I believe.
I'm really not sure that helps to clarify anything ... but I hope it provides a 'jumping off' point for the whole deal. There's a LOT more to the arguments on both sides, both Thelemic and GD (and magical order agnostic, for that matter) - but it is one of the major changes in the Thoth deck, along with the substitution of the Aeon for Judgement.
If anything there is in error, please feel free to correct me... this is discussed very clearly indeed in DuQuettes book, by the way. |
|
|