Okay, so we've been touching on this in various other threads, and I think it deserves its own topic. To clarify, I'm talking not only about the current Channel 4 trend for repackaging 'makeover television' types as 1950s dominatrixes (Kirsty from Location, Location, Location, Jo from Supernanny, Kim from How Clean Is Your House?) but the wider phenomenon of being chastised by a finger-wagging stranger in the same of self-improvement.
Also, I suppose I'm including the not-so-'trixy varieties of 'improving' hectorer: jolly-hockeysticks poshsters (What Not To Wear); 'I told you so' nag (Sarah 'Jugs' Beeny in Property Ladder); strict machine (Life Laundry woman); shouty military (Bad Lads Army); American (House Doctor); campster (Queer Eye); American campster (Alvin Hall in that 'sort out your finances, retard' thing) and shouty military American campster (that thing not so long ago where young offenders were exposed to God-scented motivational bellowing from charismatic black American ex-military blokes).
Is it a Good Thing? Saveloy's advanced his friend's notion that it is because these programmes teach you the stuff you don't learn at school. I'm not so sure; I think it can be a Good Thing, if one is careful to avoid individuals who're clearly vulnerable. I've already made the point elsewhere, for example, that some of the How Clean Is Your House? squalor-monkeys appear quite palpably depressed. There's also a slightly infantilising aspect to these programmes, particularly the more dominatrixy ones, which makes me wonder whether they encourage regressive behaviour...
Thoughts? |