BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Essay in Truth

 
 
Duane
09:09 / 02.07.04
“That we should no longer be children tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the trickery of men in the cunning craftiness by which they lie in wait to deceive, but speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things into him...” --Ephesians 4:14-15

ESSAY IN TRUTH

When we ask questions in search of spiritual truth, we’ll never find the answer that will satisfy our questions because:
1.) The need that we are trying to fulfill within ourselves by asking intellectual questions cannot be touched or filled in the least through intellectual knowledge, no matter how great or correct that knowledge may be. Knowledge cannot bridge the separation between oneself and the Ultimate Reality. That can only be bridged through the actual merging of one’s own being into the Ultimate Reality, which can only happen through personal experience. “You search the scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life...but you are not willing to come to Me that you may have life” (John 5:39-40). It must be experienced.
2.) We are taught through reason and logic that something is either true or else it is false, so we phrase our questions based on that reasoning to acquire an answer that must separate true from false or right from wrong. Therefore, all the questions we normally ask as to “Is this true?” or “Is this false?” or “Is this belief better than that belief?” are all wrong questions—or, better said, wrong logic. If we are to get an inkling of the truth, we must look deeper into the question and instead of asking whether something in right or wrong we must change our logic and ask the question, “What does it do?” And we need to feel “within” ourselves what takes place if we actually believed in any particular concept, religious doctrine, or philosophy.

It is common sense that if people found the truth in China, Japan the U.S., India, or any other place, that the truth they’d find would have to be the same. But their expression of that truth would very greatly, depending upon their cultural influences, language, and customs. This is to say that in fact every religious belief, concept, and philosophy is correct. Using our normal, everyday reason and logic, everyone would agree that this statement is absurd. How, for instance, could a religion believing that Christ is the Son of God and one not believing that Christ is the Son of God be equally true? Or how could one that believes in reincarnation as opposed to one that believes in Heaven and Hell also be equally true? Very simply: wrong logic. Although they’re all equally true, they’re also all equally false. The truth cannot be held in words. It must be experienced. Religious beliefs, concepts, philosophies, etc. are methods to lead a person to that inexpressible, experiential truth. Once again, we must ask, “What does believing and practicing this make happen within me?” And here we find, below the surface, a commonality or sameness of all religious belief systems and an identical leading to that one Truth out of which these religions grew.
For example, if I were to believe in reincarnation (including karma) in its simplest form, I’d know that no matter what took place in my life, I could live life after life until I got it right, so I wouldn’t be troubled so much in my present life situation. And if some calamity happens during my present life, the impact of that calamity (the worry and grief over the situation) would be slight because according to that belief, it would be a retribution of some previous negative action on my part that was being paid back. And through belief in karma, one can actually feel calm and grateful in negative situations. If I am Christian, I believe in Heaven and Hell, but because I would believe that Christ died for my sins, then I would be heaven-bound no matter what, and life’s experiences can be tolerated by my having faith in the hereafter. These are two examples of two completely different ideologies that produce the same effect, which is a reduction in fear and worry (i.e., a reduction in thought). If you look through all the different rituals (Buddhist meditation; Old Testament sacrifices; Christian prayer, communion, or singing of hymns), you’ll find the same result occurs: reduction of thought.
Descartes said, “I think; therefore, I am.” To phrase this closer to the truth, one would have to alter it a bit and say, “I think; therefore, I appear to be.” To go a step further, the reverse is also true: “I don’t think; therefore, I am not.” The “I” in “I don’t think” is my normal, everyday self, and the “I am not” is God (or, better said, self-God realization). This means, then, “I cease thought; therefore, I experience God.” On that simple truth rests the validity of all religious beliefs and practices as methods to bring about a reduction in thought, which leads to spiritual experience. In looking a bit deeper into the statement “I don’t think; therefore, I am not,” there is an important truth that becomes apparent. That truth is that what we are seeking is already present, and that what stands between spiritual experience and our present ignorance is simply the activity of our mind. When our mind ceases thought, we automatically awaken to our true nature and our life’s problems are ended. “...the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).
Now the problem: No matter what religious method or path we should choose to believe in and follow, the best that can be accomplished is only a reduction in thought. Any effort to cease thought entirely will fall short because it requires thought to make that effort. The only exceptions I’m aware of are extremely dangerous drugs or accidents where someone may momentarily “die” and be revived. You’ll hear them speak similarly of life as an illusion and the utopia or ocean of love and light that lives within. Anyway, by normal means, it is “humanly” impossible to see “God.”
The solution: The solution cannot be explained. It, too, must be experienced. That is, when thought is reduced sufficiently through meditation, prayer, or other religious methods, there is within us a power or energy that will rise and manifest itself within the space or room that exists in the absence of so many thoughts. “...out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water, but this spake He of the Spirit...” (John 7:38, 39). This “conscious contact” with the power within is experienced by most as a pressure or energy mass across the bridge of the nose, between the eyes (forehead). In the beginning, it may feel like a headache. This manifestation of power is called many different names by the various religions: Christians: Holy Spirit, Christ Within, Christ’s Name, or The Word; Jews: Light Within, Spirit of God (Rauch); Hindus: rising kundalini (Prana), Zen Buddhism, the ox; Chinese, Chi. Although the names differ, the pattern of development is the same, and that is: following a religion in which there occurs a reduction in thought brings about a conscious awareness of this manifestation of power and when cultivated or allowed to manifest, it’ll become strong enough to allow the activity of our normal thinking mind to rest securely within “it” and cease thought. In that no thought, the manifestation of power is the vehicle which carries us into “The Kingdom of God” or “Nirvana.” “As many as received Him, to them gave He power to become the sons/daughters of God, even to them that believe on His name” (John 1:12).
Even though we are manifested and without thought, we still retain awareness, or a witnessing capability, and our Will; therefore, this is as much something that happens to us as it is something we permit and help to take place. And as we are lifted out (or, as Zen would say, “as we let our minds and bodies fall”, we will always be in awareness of what is happening but not aware of where it’s leading us. This moment is called a “leap of faith,” a leap that can be halted by us at anytime if we are not ready, due to our fear of the unknown or our clinging to our present life as we know it. This point brings to mind one of Christ’s teachings, which is, “Whoever desires to save his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for My sake will find it” (Matthew 16:25). Also, another: “You must be born again” (John 3:7). It goes almost without saying that to be born again, we are first talking about facing what seems to be our own death, which, to our normal mind, brings about a great deal of fear and apprehension. But to the “manifested mind,” we find our security not within our earthly existence but within the comfort and security of the manifestation itself.
The question that usually arises at this point is, “Will I be able to come back?” Once again, wrong logic. In truth, nothing actually changes; yet everything has changed for us. The death is not a dying but a complete breakaway from our limited mind into the truth of who and what we really are and always have been. The “death” is the death of ignorance. We have now become enlightened or awakened to our true nature and walk in the knowledge of what we are, of what life is, where we came from, and where we’re going. “The Comforter (Holy Spirit, Raised Power, or Manifestation) will teach you all things and bring all things to your remembrance” (John 14:26).
So, to sum up what is important in seeking the truth: it has to be through one’s own personal experience or revelation, which is brought about by a contact and reliance upon that inner power or manifestation. The initial inner contact with that power is “not” brought about by increasing our knowledge, concepts, or beliefs, but by actually a reduction of thought or a surrender of our “self,” which is our thinking mind with all of its beliefs. As Christ said, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich men to enter the Kingdom of God” (Matthew 19:24). A “rich man” is rich in ideas, beliefs, attachments, and thoughts. As Adam was expelled from the Garden of Eden because he ate of the tree of knowledge, so we must surrender our knowledge to re-enter the Garden of Eden and eat of the tree of eternal life (or, as said in Zen, “return to our original nature”. And all of this happens naturally, of its own accord, for anyone who desires it and raises the power within. “And he said to them all, “If any man will come after Me, let him deny himself (no thought), and take up his cross daily (raise the manifestation; power), and follow me (let go)” (Luke 9:23).

. .

CENTER DOT METHOD
(Place 2 dots about 2.5 inches apart on the top edge of a piece of paper)

There are six major similarities within the teachings of all religions:

1.) There is a power “inside” each person.
2.) Its original position is somewhere below the navel.
3.) It must be concentrated together (quickened).
4.) It must be raised.
5.) It will center in the forehead.
6.) It will pierce through or open to enlightenment, liberation, eternal life.

As said, this “energy mass” or “power” is called by different names according to the various religions: the Holy Spirit, the Light Within, Christ Within, Christ’s Name, The Word, Power Within, Sexual Energy, Rising Kundalini, the Ox, Chi, etc. The “piercing” into enlightenment is referred to as Satori by the Zen Buddhists, the sixth chakra opening by the Hindus, the third eye opening by the Occult, and the sixth church or the Church of Philadelphia by the Christians (see Rev. 3:7-13: “...and he shall go out no more”. Also see Rev. 22:1-5: “...They shall see His face, and His name shall be in their foreheads.”
A simple method of reducing thought and raising the power to the forehead is the “Center Dot Method.” Sit comfortably in a chair, spine erect (but not rigid), and look over the two dots that you have drawn at the top of a piece of paper, to a point about three feet away. (Note: If you use 2 different colored dots, such as red and yellow, you can mentally balance the center dot to a perfect orange. This will center the manifestation in the best possible position for enlightenment). You will “notice” three dots (the center dot is an overlapping of the two dots). Carefully lower your eyes to look directly at the center dot and bring it into focus. Use this for meditation. As you concentrate on the dot, count your breath from 1-10 and back again; breathe from the stomach. Keep the body relaxed.
After practicing this for a while, a pressure will be felt between the eyes or in the forehead. Gently breathe into the pressure when exhaling to strengthen it. Remain relaxed and put your “attention” on the pressure now as your stare is fixed on the center dot.
After the power has been strengthened and stabilized, this “energy mass” should be moved around to gain some control over it. First, concentrate on a spot on the top of your head and tap your forehead lightly with your fingers. The power will move to the top of your head. Now reverse the process to return it to the forehead. This “energy mass” should be raised in the morning and manifested throughout the day, with time given at night for direct concentration on it. Eventually, it will become ready, gain enough power, and open to “enlightenment” and the beginning of a spiritual life.
A final word: With love, I pray that you continue in the Spirit after Enlightenment and let the Spirit lead you and show you your rightful inheritance. As the now born-of-spirit son/daughter of God – a new creation – a new world of great splendor and eternal joy awaits you. “In My Father’s house are many mansions...” (John 14:2).

Guru4tru@aol.com
 
 
Unconditional Love
19:45 / 02.07.04
Thats alot of words about words not being the truth, and alot of thinking about not thinking. but i enjoyed it.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
10:44 / 03.07.04
Same here, not sure I necessarily agree with it, but food for thought. Which is bad. Damn you Duane! (shakes fist)
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:24 / 03.07.04
1.) The need that we are trying to fulfill within ourselves by asking intellectual questions cannot be touched or filled in the least through intellectual knowledge, no matter how great or correct that knowledge may be. Knowledge cannot bridge the separation between oneself and the Ultimate Reality. That can only be bridged through the actual merging of one’s own being into the Ultimate Reality, which can only happen through personal experience.

This is a pretty standard approach in religion, cults and some of the windier side alleys of metaphysics - that one cannot find a "true" answer through reason, as reason and truth as inimical, and thus can only discover the truth through a mystical process, usually a specific process offered by the person making this statement.

2.) We are taught through reason and logic that something is either true or else it is false, so we phrase our questions based on that reasoning to acquire an answer that must separate true from false or right from wrong

Well... no. Logic deals in truth statements. Reason doesn't need to at all.

Therefore, all the questions we normally ask as to “Is this true?” or “Is this false?” or “Is this belief better than that belief?” are all wrong questions—or, better said, wrong logic.

Also, were we not complaining about the fruitless dichotomy of truth and falsity through reason just above? Ergo, this judgement, based as it is on a founding hypothesis, is in itself a judgement of reason and so locked into the rationalist trap of truth and falsity.

If we are to get an inkling of the truth, we must look deeper into the question and instead of asking whether something in right or wrong we must change our logic and ask the question, “What does it do?” And we need to feel “within” ourselves what takes place if we actually believed in any particular concept, religious doctrine, or philosophy.

One of the problems we are going to come up against a fair bit here is what "the truth" is. True things, or a universal and transcendent truth?

It is common sense that if people found the truth in China, Japan the U.S., India, or any other place, that the truth they’d find would have to be the same.

Nope. This only makes sense if you have previously established "truth" as a Platonic absolute, partaken of rather than deduced. As such, pretty much everything after this statement is unsafe.

For example, if I were to believe in reincarnation (including karma) in its simplest form, I’d know that no matter what took place in my life, I could live life after life until I got it right, so I wouldn’t be troubled so much in my present life situation.

This isn't exactly how it has to function. this is one view of reincarnation, and frankly a rather hippyish, new age one.


If I am Christian, I believe in Heaven and Hell, but because I would believe that Christ died for my sins, then I would be heaven-bound no matter what, and life’s experiences can be tolerated by my having faith in the hereafter. These are two examples of two completely different ideologies that produce the same effect, which is a reduction in fear and worry (i.e., a reduction in thought).

Again, this is a very specific form of Christianity.
If you look through all the different rituals (Buddhist meditation; Old Testament sacrifices; Christian prayer, communion, or singing of hymns), you’ll find the same result occurs: reduction of thought.

Sorry, not buying. Some aspects of religious *ritual* are (no surprises) ritualistic, but that does not mean a) that they necessarily reduce thought or b) that the religious *belief*, which is what you were generalising about above re: reincarnation and Christianity, has that as a result or an aim. Take a look at Ancient Greek religion.

Descartes said, “I think; therefore, I am.” To phrase this closer to the truth, one would have to alter it a bit and say, “I think; therefore, I appear to be.” To go a step further, the reverse is also true: “I don’t think; therefore, I am not.” The “I” in “I don’t think” is my normal, everyday self, and the “I am not” is God (or, better said, self-God realization). This means, then, “I cease thought; therefore, I experience God.”

These statements do not logically follow. Especially as, again, you have confused your terminology. The examples of reincarnation and Christianity above do not reduce *thought*, as you claim, they reduce *temporal concern*. Different thing. I don't think, for example, that Thomas Aquinas or Boethius found that their religion reduced thought. You may want to look at "The Birth fo Tragedy" by Friedrich Nietzsche for a demonstration of the argument you are trying to put together here. Also, you keep using "true" and "truth" as values identified to statements, which you have already told us is invalid and actually contrary to the experience of the truth.

On that simple truth rests the validity of all religious beliefs and practices as methods to bring about a reduction in thought, which leads to spiritual experience. In looking a bit deeper into the statement “I don’t think; therefore, I am not,” there is an important truth that becomes apparent. That truth is that what we are seeking is already present, and that what stands between spiritual experience and our present ignorance is simply the activity of our mind. When our mind ceases thought, we automatically awaken to our true nature and our life’s problems are ended. “...the truth shall make you free” (John 8:32).

Fair enough. Nothing you have said so far has proven that, however. You may want to have a look at Schopenhauer's theory of aesthetics, along obviously with the Buddhist texts you are presumably already familiar with, for another way of looking at and this.

(lots of statements about what happens when you stop thinking)


There are six major similarities within the teachings of all religions:

1.) There is a power “inside” each person.
2.) Its original position is somewhere below the navel.
3.) It must be concentrated together (quickened).
4.) It must be raised.
5.) It will center in the forehead.
6.) It will pierce through or open to enlightenment, liberation, eternal life.


Um..what?

As said, this “energy mass” or “power” is called by different names according to the various religions: the Holy Spirit, the Light Within, Christ Within, Christ’s Name, The Word, Power Within, Sexual Energy, Rising Kundalini, the Ox, Chi, etc. The “piercing” into enlightenment is referred to as Satori by the Zen Buddhists, the sixth chakra opening by the Hindus, the third eye opening by the Occult, and the sixth church or the Church of Philadelphia by the Christians (see Rev. 3:7-13: “...and he shall go out no more”. Also see Rev. 22:1-5: “...They shall see His face, and His name shall be in their foreheads.”

Again, this is pretty sketchy. F'r example, I'm not sure a lot of Christians I know would identify Satori as the same as the Church of Philadelphia. You're looking at a subgroup of a subgroup (literalist Christians) And "the Occult"...that's a big circle for a rather heterogenous set of beliefs.


A final word: With love, I pray that you continue in the Spirit after Enlightenment and let the Spirit lead you and show you your rightful inheritance. As the now born-of-spirit son/daughter of God – a new creation – a new world of great splendor and eternal joy awaits you. “In My Father’s house are many mansions...” (John 14:2).


Which is all good but...

Basically, what we have here is a meditation technique. People can practice that as they will, and can tell us the results here. But the surrounding setting? Strikes me as highly constructively researched. Everyone wants to discover a universal truth - it's the metaphysical equivalent of the Babe Ruth rookie card. But hat doesn't mean universal truth is there for the taking, or that it is wise to assume a monopoly on it or the methods of its discovery.
 
 
Boy in a Suitcase
14:57 / 03.07.04
The truth is that Billie Jean is NOT my lover. OK? OK??!!? She's just a girl.
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
16:11 / 03.07.04
As said, this “energy mass” or “power” is called by different names according to the various religions: the Holy Spirit, the Light Within, Christ Within, Christ’s Name, The Word, Power Within, Sexual Energy, Rising Kundalini, the Ox, Chi, etc.,

Don't have time to engage fully with this thread this afternoon, but just wanted to address this bit. You're conflating a whole bunch of different concepts in that statement in a very new-agey reductionist sort of way. For instance 'Chi' is a very different concept to 'Kundalini'. They are very clearly not the same thing.

I'm sure the tantra scholars on here will be along in a minute to correct my limited understanding of Kundalini, but as far as I'm aware, it is generally described as an energy that lies semi-dormant at the base of the spine, coiled like a snake, and various practices are required to encourage it to rise up the spinal column into the crown chakra. Whereas Chi doesn't function like that at all. In any sense. In Chinese medicine, Chi is thought of as a subtle energy that interpenetrates everything. It flows through a complex map of meridian channels within the body, that can be stimulated by accupuncture, shiatsu, or the various forms and breathing practices of Tai Chi and Chi Kung. The Hindu concept of 'Prana' is probably a closer match to Chi, than Kundalini is.

I'd also argue that the 'Holy Spirit', 'Christ Within' and 'Sexual Energy' are again three very different specific concepts, that don't necessarily benefit from being dumbed down into a homogenous new agey meta-concept of 'energy', in the way that you seem to be suggesting.
 
 
Papess
17:15 / 03.07.04
I am not a tantric master, but I do know...

Chi= life energy

Prana= breath, and while breath is an applied form energy, prana is not as encompassing as the term "chi"

Kundalini= sexual energy, and while it also is a form of "chi", it is not as general a term as "chi" is. Although, I believe some very hardcore tantrics would claim, through the play of Shiva and Shakti, that Kundalini is life energy and therefore, "chi". This seems to be redundant, IMO.
 
 
Duane
01:53 / 04.07.04
As long as we can not open ourselves to the sameness of all religions, as displayed by the feedback to the above "Essay in Truth", then we will have to keep on killing each other in the name of "God".
 
 
*
03:38 / 04.07.04
Or, we can accept and value the diversity of all religions, try to understand the cultural contexts and influences of each one, and not assume we know everything there is to know about someone else's religious practice. We can realize that we don't know the truth, if there is truth, and that it is precisely the many different truths that make the diversity of religions valuable. One way leads people to stop killing each other based on religion because every religion has been blended into the vanilla pudding of bland global sameness, and the other way leads to people not killing each other based on religion because they've learned to appreciate and value difference. Learning to appreciate difference might lead to a general reduction in killing, while eliminating difference in religion only guarantees that people will find difference elsewhere. Of course, the way I describe is probably not as good, because it means thinking.
 
 
Unconditional Love
07:28 / 04.07.04
kundalini seems similar to jing within that branch of chinese body energy, jing is symbolised by the tiger, chi by the serpent, and shen (spirit) by the dragon, chi symbolised by a serpent can often confuse it with kundalini.

jing can be thought of as semen, the testes, the ovaries, and it is the energy of these areas that need to be converted to chi, the natal and prenantal chi, forget its name.
 
 
Unconditional Love
07:33 / 04.07.04
recognising difference doesnt nessecarily mean thinking, it could also mean experencing that difference through contact with various religions and also recognising the similarity.

how have i heard this described......

the many that are one and the one that is many.

similar difference and different similarity.

or some such.
 
 
the cat's iao
08:42 / 04.07.04
Some of this can be framed in the debate that occurs between those who are after what is known as a "perennial philosophy" and those who view religion as constructed and context dependent. Without getting to deep into the subtleties, on the surface it can be understood as those who think there is one truth or set of truths behind all religions, and those who feel that there is no inherent truth or set of truths to religion, although they might share (some) common characteristics.

Personally, I feel that such a debate is, in a sense, artificial. It is both & it is neither. Kinda' like wolfangel is saying about many & one, or difference & similarity. It's hard to go beyond that because language breaks down. I mean, it becomes like contrary statements, which becomes nonsense.

It seems sorta' like there is a religion from which all others are derived, but this religion doesn't recognize itself completely in any one instance, nor can it recognize itself as completely instantiated in other forms; however, the variety of instances move towards a completion of that religion, which doesn't exist because it is never completely instantiated in any form or collection of forms. Thus, there is and isn't a perennial philosophy, and religion is and isn't merely context dependent.

See, I told you it turns to nonsense!

 
 
eco
19:48 / 04.07.04
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.

I imagine if some alien culture were to visit us they might exclaim, "Truth? What a quaint concept! That sounds like something you invented because you needed it. Where we come from things just are, except when they're not of course!"
 
 
Gypsy Lantern
20:21 / 04.07.04
As long as we can not open ourselves to the sameness of all religions, as displayed by the feedback to the above "Essay in Truth", then we will have to keep on killing each other in the name of "God".

So, in other words, the fact that Chi and Kundalini are clearly two entirely different technical concepts existing in two very sophisticated spiritual traditions should be glossed over, because that would fit better with your nice little idea. Interesting concept of "truth" you've got going there.
 
 
Papess
21:34 / 04.07.04
I think I understand what Duane is trying to state, except it is done in rather a clumsy format and holier-than-thou manner.

Religons and Belief systems are like people.

We are all different expressions of the same basic unifying , absolute truth of existence...whatever the hell that is.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
22:27 / 04.07.04
Well, we're all exemplifications of the principle that people have children. That's pretty much the universal truth of people. I mention Schopenhauer upthread - he's got a principium individuationis thing going on...
 
 
Seth
22:44 / 04.07.04
It’s interesting to ask exactly what can be stated as “true,” though. For example, the majority of people eat, shit, grow, breathe, respond to stimuli, move around, communicate, and are capable of reproducing. We experience the world through the five senses (to say there are more than five gets into the realm of supposition based on our belief systems), building our own conception of that world through distorting, generalising and deleting parts from that vast amount of data. We are our bodies, and getting to know and work with our bodies helps us to understand ourselves. In general, we have to find a means of supporting ourselves in society, have a place to live, and have people who we can call friends. We might even ask one of those friends if they’d like to reproduce with us at some point. Actively caring about the people around us is an end in itself that usually costs us very little, and has the neat side effect that they’re more likely to reciprocate that care.

Not an exhaustive list, but you get the idea. I’m starting to wonder whether any system of magic that isn’t rooted in these kind of basics is worth much. Don’t get me wrong, it’s fun to pick up ideas and techniques and play with them, but if they’re not relevant to those kind of fundamentals then I won’t tend to use them for long. So when it comes down to stuff like this:

There are six major similarities within the teachings of all religions:

1.) There is a power “inside” each person.
2.) Its original position is somewhere below the navel.
3.) It must be concentrated together (quickened).
4.) It must be raised.
5.) It will center in the forehead.
6.) It will pierce through or open to enlightenment, liberation, eternal life.


… I dunno. I’m the kind of person who’d doubt the reasoning behind these being categorised as the “six major similarities within the teachings of all religions,” asking questions like, “based on what evidence?” But I’m much more likely to find the objective extremely woolly, and wonder how it’s going to be applicable in my life from day-to-day. Given that I don’t believe in enlightenment, liberation or eternal life (they’re just words I’ve never really used), and I don’t know about Duane’s conception of enlightenment, liberation and eternal life, am I going to have much use for your “truth?”

Thanks for the free technique, though. Seems pretty cool. Might use that one.
 
 
Digital Hermes
04:43 / 05.07.04
Sharpen your pointy truth-sticks, duke it out, and see whichever one is most truthful.

Facetiousness aside, one of the dangers in metaphysics, or anything these days, is announcing that you've got the answer. That it's all figured out. On a website I write for, another columnist wrote an article about the Universe being essentially mathematical, with the laws of physics and such, so therefore you could predict the future with some sort of super-computer. Trying not to sound pretentious, it felt to me like a young man's conceit, the sort of Hamlet-syndrome of reasoning out creation. As soon as someone says they've got the answer, the ultimate truth, or the way of reaching it, it get scary.

Duane, it seems like we all agree, or mostly agree, with all of your points, but I think myself and others may agree less with the on-high stance you seem to be taking. One of the magical things about Magick, for me at least, in this globalized WWW-laden existence, is plurality. Being able to see Buddha and Jesus in a bar, drunk, agreeing with each other.

By finding a way to include all of the different religions and truth-seekers, by acknowledging their differences and particulars, makes the system broader and to me, more powerful. By boiling them down, and saying that they are all masks of the truth, seems to ignore the beauty of a Roman cathedral and it's stained glass windows, or a Mayan depiction of Quetzalcoatl(sp?). There are probably as many religions out there as there are people, since everyone worships just a little differently. The fact that they all (or at least most of them) point in a similar direction doesn't mean they are all a little wrong, maybe they're all a little right, in their own way. And whatever cosmic entity(ies) that might be out there; their too complex and infinite for me to describe them any other way then personally, in relation to myself, and what works for me.

In closers... a quote. I don't know where I grabbed it from, and it's not an answer, but it's sure a good hint... to me.

"If you can conceive of a Buddha, you are obstructed by that Buddha!"
 
 
Duane
16:02 / 05.07.04
hum...sort of sirprising...I'm not a writer by any means but I thought I did a pretty good job with this essay. I guess times have changed or I just wasn't able to express myself properly in writing. Back in 1983, after satori, I received a letter from a women, who shortly after died of aids, "What is the right religion?" This essay, minus the dot method, was my answer to her. I've been working with people almost daily since then and have never encountered the response that I have encountered here. I suppose I should try to rewrite it, but I believe that I'm dying of cancer now so it really doesn't matter. That's why I posted it...thought I could help someone before I get out of here. It is sort of strange though that some people have shared their deepest graditude to me for sharing the essay with them and that it has changed their lifes. How could the same essay produce two entirely different effects within people...I suppose the effect has nothing to do with the essay. The effect must have been there prior to the cause. But I could be wrong about everthing. The "element of doubt" in my greatest possession. Take care.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:54 / 05.07.04
Duane, dude - if you believe you are dying of cancer, *see a doctor*. At the very least, it will give you a better idea of how long you have left to teach others. At the very best, it may either put your mind at rest or possibly prolong your life indefinitely. Even if you are ready to cross over, it can't hurt to have a better idea of how and when you are likely to do so.
 
 
Duane
00:28 / 06.07.04
I thank you for your concern...but that is sillyness. After all these years of longing, you think I want to postphone my reunion with "Love"?
Among other things I made sculptures. One of my last sculptures I made out of a large piece of driftwood. It sort of looks a little like the Grim Reeper without the reeper and with nothing inside the cloak. It's sort of warm but scary looking at the same time.
I named it "The Cloak of Death--Loves Final Disguise".

LITS (Love In The Spirit),
Duane
 
  
Add Your Reply