Shanghai: Hmmm... I'd hate to suggest a duality, but I think you understand what I mean, yes. There's the YOU that you know, and then there's the YOU that I know. Once the YOU you know(True Self) dies when your brain dies, all that's left is the one I know(Idea Self).
The goal isn't so much making sure your Idea Self is a good one, but that the idea of you and the true you are integrated and working together. Like the Napolean idea is much different than the man's idea of himself. It's a matter of living -and then dying- gracefully.
I think you and I may run into problems eventually during this conversation becasue I think of these terms as verbs and activity, and I think you want to solidify them as nouns(Self). In any case, once one verb(you YOU) dies, the other(us YOU) is fired into the future... so yeah, WE could fuck with the idea of you, but so what? it's OUR idea of you. We can do what we like. -And that's the crux of the argument and the role of Jesus-types.
IF you align your YOUs not so much as concrete iconic personality types, but more like emotional and rational directional energy (For example, suppose our idea of YOU is the a compulsion to always do the right thing), then you have the opportunity to align your youYOU(True/brain Self) with that compulsion. Voila! You've just insured for yourself everlasting life.
Thus you have a new understanding of the Christian doctrine that you should die to yourself. You've basically killed your individual personality in order to do live forever as a compulsion amongst the collective. Maybe that seems a bit selfish? Or maybe it's just the biota's bain cells(that's really what we are, after all) realizing their part in the grand scheme and doing the best thing for the integrity of the biota superorganism.
Capice?
Ideas are impossible to kill but easy to subvert. |