| |
|
I previously attempted a 'Penis Monologues' type thread
And thank you for that again, by the way. I have a tendency to be reduced to incoherent rage by the way that UK/US culture tends to represent an orgasmic woman in order to imply a penis - the Trojan adverts ("For Her Pleasure", which showed the face of a woman who was coming* in order to sell a product for penises) are a blatant example, but there's also a tendency in talking about impotence/erectile dysfunction, for example, to couch it in terms of "inability to satisfy a woman" rather than "inability to have orgasms". As if penises were always instrumental and never themselves the site of pleasure (too vulnerable, maybe?)
I said this before in a different penis thread and killed it, and it tends to kill RL conversations stone-dead, as well. I've never worked out why. The idea that penises are fun to play with, and not just semi-inert things that you have to drug and coax into the correct state in order to satisfy someone else - tools, never to be appreciated for themselves but only for what they can do - seems like a nice idea to me.
*Okay, well, she actually looked like she was in pain or dead, but that's a separate rant. |
|
|
