|
|
Grant wrote Well, in Hoff's defense, he uses the pre-existing Pooh, not the Disney version.
Yes, of course. But as the saying goes: No one can do to Walt Disney, what Disney Inc. did to the Brothers Grimm.
Problem is that since the takeover, it's very hard not to think of Disney while reading Pooh. Sad but true, at least for me.
FinderWolf wrote: And plus, the Tao isn't something you should need to read a dissertation on or two detailed philosophy textbooks to get. It's more about just living life, I think, and sensing what's there in the process of life.
Yes, I agree. When people ask me about the Tao I say that the Tao is what a smooth rock, the gaze of a very small child and someone who moves without thinking about how, has in common. It's not much of a point to say much more.
It's not much of a point to know it either, since that also means that you know what's not the Tao as well. And also that thinking about it furthers you from it.
And that everything is the Tao.
And nothing.
Silence. |
|
|