|
|
He's just not capable of instilling any confidence.
Interestingly, even many conservatives are panning Bush's performance, albeit gently. Some samples from the National Review's Corner blog:
A reader agrees: "Derb---I'm with you all the way regarding your last Corner posting. As I watched the press conference, I was thinking that the President reminded me of a graduate student at his oral prelims who wasn't really ready, but thought the committee would just let him skate through. To wit--Reporter: 'Mr. President, during the 2000 campaign you stated that the biggest mistake in your life was trading Sammy Sosa. What has been your biggest mistake post 9/11?' Bush: 'Um. . . Gee whiz, Fred, I wish you would've submitted that question in writing beforehand so that I could prepare for it.' Well Jesus, Mary, and Martha, how could he (and his group) not anticipate that kind of question? Even a trite reply of 'never apologize, never explain' would be better that the answer he gave."
This is right. It sometimes seems that GWB is determined to play to the negative stereotype of him, viz. that he is lazy, sloppy, and ill-prepared. First-hand accounts of the administration, like David Frum's book, don't leave that impression at all -- but only us inside-baseball types read those accounts. To the great majority of voters, Bush is what he appears to be at events like last night's: sincere, human and patriotic, but at the same time lazy, sloppy, and ill-prepared.
---
I'm with this guy, I'm on his side. Still, there is just something about a Bush speech, or news conference, that fails to stir my blood. I'm sorry, but I think the President is desperately, hopelessly inarticulate.
---
During my days as a political flak, I always told candidates that the easiest statement for the voters to understand is "I was wrong." Shouldn't the President admit that we've made mistakes in post-war Iraq? Would that really hurt him? Why not say "Dragging a nation from decades of tyranny into the free world is a hard job. We have made mistakes, but the mission is so important we can't afford to wait for perfection. We've got to learn and move on." Wouldn't that be the right answer politically, in addition to being the truth? |
|
|