|
|
I usually don't care about awards but glancing through this year's Eisners' nominees list made me a little unconfotable. how can it be representative of the Comics' mainstream of 2003 if it nominates Bendis for most of them for Best Writer [again] and on the other hand doesn't even mention books like THE FILTH?
nice bunch of diversity on the list, but it's still a bit thin. I wonder if the 5 people who chose the nominees have even come across books like that. hm, maybe they did and never liked them. but not even Weston's art? Kieron Dwyer on LAST OF THE INDEPENDENTS? come on, they're genuine Pop objects, the latter having been rated A- by Marc Bernardin from Entertainment Weekly, one of this year's 5 guys... I'm pretty sure there were many other forgotten GNs and minis out there too but hey.
please excuse the extremely fanboyish rant, but this sounds a bit ridiculous to me. I know awards self-serve a medium, but if Comics sees itself the way it still does then there's not much hope of a stronger outreach in the end. |
|
|