|
|
Seems like a reasonable idea, although I think there's scope for controversy. I mean, people like to have a record of these sorts of things for any number of reasons; and unless a very conservative approach is taken, I predict upset.
Of course there are going to be the no-brainers: threads with no replies which no one will miss on the one hand, and threads that are valuable accounts of certain events on the other. But then there's this dreadful grey area. I also think that from a community point of view, Gathering threads can be quite interesting, and often contain useful information and links for various places and events. With the google making the place so much more searchable, I'd have thought that more of the old threads will see the light of IE again.
Then again, that might be another reason to kill some of them off...
Basically I'm a bit ambivalent about it. If bandwidth can be reclaimed, then I think there's a good argument for cutting out the dead wood, but I'm also concerned that it might not be that simple to decide what goes and what stays. At the moment I'm happy to vote for really ancient threads, with no replies, to be deleted (they can be reinstated if someone notices and objects to the loss of a particular topic, right?). But I reckon we should err on the side of caution and agree some unambiguous criteria here if there's a will to go much further than that. |
|
|