BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


A Series Of Unfortunate Events (SPOILERS likely)

 
 
Jack Fear
16:04 / 20.03.04
Wrote a little about these in the 2003 "What Are You Reading" thread, but as the series progresses I'm more and more convinced it deserves a thread of its own...

So. A Series of Unfortunate Events, by Lemony Snicket a.k.a. Daniel Handler: ten books of a projected thirteen have been published so far, (along with the related Unauthorized Autobiography of Lemony Snicket) detailing the perilous adventures of the Baudelaire orphans--Violet, Klaus, and Sunny--as, after the death of their parents in a fire that consumed their home, they pass through the hands of a string of inappropriate guardians, ever pursued by the greedy Count Olaf, who is intent on getting his hands on the fabulous Baudelaire fortune.

And it's wonderful wonderful stuff. The books are, above all, an exercise in style, and that style is in the authorial voice--a mordantly funny instrument reminiscent of Edward Gorey's best work (an impression reinforced by Brett Helquist's Gorey-esque illustrations, and the gorgeous production values of the books themselves).

But within that framework, there's some intricate plotting, a slew of literary allusions, and some postmodern metafictive game-playing. Beginning with Book 5, there's a shift in structure. The picaresque framework of the first four books resolves into a single long story arc. The Baudelaires begin to uncover hints that the fire that destroyed their home was not quite what it appeared, and that their parents were, perhaps, more than they seemed. Persons believed dead are found to be alive; characters long-forgotten reappear in unexpected contexts; patterns of events and character recur in distorted, funhouse-mirror ways; the authorial presence comes into the story, as the story of "Lemony Snicket" and his beloved Beatrice becomes a sort of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead to the Baudelaires' Hamlet, if you get my meaning.

What's really impressive to me is

(a) the way the books start to show moments of real emotional power, while never losing the atmosphere of jokey melodrama, and

(b) the subtle shift in the moral landscape as the orphans do what they must to survive, with ever-more-troubling results, and the eventual reckoning. Handler actually thinks through the consequences of the Baudelaires' growing desperation, and the acts to which it leads them: at one point he actually quotes Nietszche's line about how, when fighting monsters, you must take care lest you become a monster yourself--which gives the title of the latest book, The Slippery Slope, its delicious double meaning.

Daniel Handler has written a couple of "adult" novels under his own name, including The Basic Eight (unread by me). He's a friend of Stephin Merritt from the Magnetic Fields, and has played accordion on a couple of Merritt projects (including 69Love Songs): Merritt, in return, has written original songs that appear on the audiobook versions of the Unfortunate Events books.

Handler has appeared on television, again under his own name, to shill The Slippery Slope, under the pretense of being Lemony Snicket's "representative." Even better: Handler does bookstore appearances in character as Snicket. He brings his accordion and leads the kids in a sing-along, even.

The official site is hither, and there's a great RealAudio interview with Handler yon.

Now, I've got all sorts of speculations regarding specific points of the increasingly-complex plot, but first I've gotta know if anybody else has read these...
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
13:02 / 21.03.04
Well, I read the first one and it's going to take the promise of large sums of money to make me go anywhere near them again. While the fact that the story is unoriginal isn't necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, I find the ever present character of the 'author' tiresome. I'll leave it for the pre-Harry potter crowd which, after all, seems to be the audience it's aimed at.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:32 / 21.03.04
Hmm... I'd disagree, Flowers. For example

S

P

O

I

L

E

R

S

The forced, quasi-incestuous underage marriage that forms the dramatic climax of the first book strikes a a lot of off notes which I think Potter struggles to get into. The Unfortunate Events books seem to appeal to the sepulchral in children - the Roald Dahl bit - but then I've never actually seen a child's reaction.

Handler is a lovely - I met him at the Hammersmith whatsisface once. The Basic Eight, btw, is OK - it has a very obvious twist, and it is all rather reminiscent (although at least self-consciously so) of The Secret History, but it is not a bad way to pass a couple of hours. Pretty undemanding stuff, but amusing.
 
 
Jack Fear
15:26 / 21.03.04
How a child reacts to these books will vary with the child's developmental age. A child like our Claire, who's at seven is still too young for irony, will take the books more-or-less straight. She had some initial discomfort to get over (remember, this is a child who was horrified by Gorey's The Gashlycrumb Tinies--"A is for Anna who fell down the stairs, B is for Basil devoured by bears..."), but she has come to focus on the pluck and fortitude of the childen, on the tireless perseverance by which they withstand the misfortune that forever follows them.

Also, I think she takes a sort of transgressive pride in reading material that constantly warns her off: when we read aloud, and I come to one of those dire "Reader, if you value your sanity, read no further" notices, she puffs herself up, balls her little fists, and says solemnly, "I can handle it."

But the inherent comedy of the premise eludes her. She laughs at the silly names and the ridiculously specific definitions, yes: and I think she has some idea that the books are meant to be funny--but I don't think she quite understands why.

I think you're both right and wrong with the Dahl comparison, Haus--right in that Dahl also tends towards the morbid and the miserable, but wrong, I think, in that Dahl lacks a certain wink-nudge quality prevalent in Snicket.

I can't quite express it, but I think it's got something to do with narrative distance: Dahl's right in there with his characters, in their here-and-now, while Snicket is constantly placing the Baudelaires' narrative in the larger context of his own life and investigation--and eventually, of the vast conspiracy that surrounds them all.

Anyway: I can imagine the books going down a storm with slightly older readers, especially with kids who've read some Dickens...
 
 
Yotsuba & Benjamin!
00:12 / 22.03.04
Jack, fire away.

These books are fantastic. I'm in the middle of The Carnivorous Carnival right now. I'd echo all of your statements above. The way that these books are so incredibly moving at times is always a pleasant surprise. (Or, more likely, a sad surprise.) Most of it is due to the fact that handler is an incredibly talented writer. You could a lot worse than wearing Nabokov influences on your sleeve. And the end of every book ends on such an amazingly moving image/moment.

I don't know what to say to start off. They're just incredibly good. And yeah, I can't see young kids really getting all of the nuance and irony. (I can imagine having to point out, "See? Deja Vu means seeing the same thing over again. And he showed the same page twice!") And lets just take an aside and talk about the physical things he does with the books. The Deja Vu, the black page when they're falling down the elevator shaft. He not only does amazing things with language, he also does amazing things with the physical form of the novel itself.

So, yeah. Fire away.
 
 
Jack Fear
14:05 / 22.03.04
Okay, Benjamin... you might noit want tolook at this until after you've read The Slippery Slope--a bopok which hugely expands the series' scope and worldview, as the depths of the conspiracies surrounding them, and more about the true nature of VFD, are revealed--but the hints start coming in The Carnivorous Carnival...

B
I
G

H
O
N
K
I
N
'

P
L
O
T
-
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C

S
P
O
I
L
E
R
S

Based on the photo of the Snicket brothers (Lemony & Jacques) with the Baudelaire parents, I believe that Mrs. Baudelaire is the sister to whom Lemony is sending coded messages--making Lemony Snicket, in fact, the Baudelaires' uncle.

I've also got a gut feeling that Aunt Josephine will eventually turn up alive: there's a throwaway reference to an "Ike" in The Slippery Slope that set my bells a-pinging.

The one disappointment I have with the series is that Violet's inventions are generally pretty lame and ridiculous. That particularly dampened my enjoyment of The Ersatz Elevator. One gets the feeling that Handler himself is not particularly, um, handy...

But the odd thing is that in the larger context of the books it hardly matters: the atmosphere is everything--fraught with danger, shot through with streaks of wonder and tenderness. I can hardly wait for the next one.
 
 
grant
14:20 / 23.03.04
I actually like these books better than my young victim. I mean ward. I mean stepson.

Yeah, anyway -- he's turning 10 this week, and got really bored around book 7 or 8 because, in his words, "They're always the same! The kids get assigned to some awful caretaker, Count Olaf shows up in disguise, nobody believes that it's him, and they get away at the last minute!"

It took a long time to convince him that the 9th book is actually quite a bit different. He's getting through that one now, and I've promised not to read the 10th one until he's through it.

I know I finished the Carnivorous Carnival (book 9) about a year ago, and was starting to get into the whole arc of the thing.

I didn't know he was actually buddies with Merritt -- I knew the books-on-tape thing (and have heard one, having checked it out of the library), but didn't realize they was, like, tight.

We also have a LOT of T-shirts. Borders was selling them at 70% off or something exactly a year ago, because we gave them to all the kids who came to his last birthday sleepover thing. And had about five left over. Little portrait of the three orphans, banner above "Series of Unfortunate Events," caption below, "Things are looking worse."

I love that. It's so grim.

I also suspect the series is squarely aimed at goth parents. The goths are making babies now.

Anyway, I think part of the appeal is the outrageousness. Kids get the sense they maybe shouldn't be reading these things (and the warnings are delightful, although, again, the boy found them tiresome after a few volumes).
 
 
Jack Fear
11:21 / 18.09.04
A quick bump: Book 11, The Grim Grotto, is released this week—on the 22nd.
 
 
Billuccho!
02:03 / 19.09.04
I think this series beats the piss out of the Potter series, really. I went through the first ten fairly quickly thanks to the library, and now can't wait to get me grubby paws on the next one. The wonderful use of language and style is what really drew me into the story... I generally find myself laughing out loud or marvelling at a particularly clever bit. I've no idea how the movie could even hope to replicate the feeling of the books.
 
 
Jack Fear
15:56 / 28.09.04
Have finished The Grim Grotto, and am delighted that most of my guesses were incorrect.




BIG HONKING PLOT-SPECIFIC SPOILERS ahead, obviously...




Kit Snicket is revealed at last, but is not, as I had surmised, the former Mrs. Baudelaire—indeed, we are pointedly told that the children "had never seen [her] before."

Another pair of siblings: Fiona and Fernald. An unexpected pleasure, this. Perhaps not entirely surprising, given The Slippery Slope's revelation re: the white-faced women, but intriguing nonetheless... and where there's two, there's three, in these books; so where's the third sibling?

The return of Phil! Egad. Coupled with the reintroductions of Bruce and Carmelita in Slope, this really serves to reinforce the self-consistent feel of the books. What I find remarkable is that he keeps doing this sort of recursive trick of either reintroducing old characters in new contexts (Bruce, Phil, Carmelita) or recontextualizing existing or even absent characters by revealing bits of their backstories (Fernald, Aunt Josephine, the Baudelaire parents—a nifty bit of recontextualization there in Grotto—more below), all the while introducing new characters and ideas. The further on we get, the more worried I become that bringing the whole series to a satisfactory conclusion will be a nigh-impossible task. Does Handler really intend to tie up every loose end? He'd better get crackin', if that's the case.

Lovely bit of character writing this time out, as the children remember some of the not-so-good times they had with their parents. You can feel their unease—to think of their parents, so long idealized by their tragic absence, as flawed human beings seems like a betrayal; at the same time they have the survivor's unresolved and unresolvable anger towards the dead. This is perceptive stuff, emotionally complex and true, but handled with a light touch.

The moral uncertainties that have lately come to the fore are still present, and still troubling. Handler shows his respect for his young audience with this tack.

So—new mysteries, new quandaries, a plot hurtling towards resolution, and hey! An ending that, cliffhanger though it may be, is unabashedly upbeat! Will the next installment be called The Turning Tide? Are we headed for The Righteous Resolution? Bring it on!
 
 
Jack Fear
15:38 / 08.10.04
After further thought and re-reading, another mystery; who is the "J.S." who is cc'd in the telegram? Not Jacques Snicket, for he is dead. Given that (a) the Baudelaires are given a rendezvous point in the city of their birth, and (b) Quigley, who sent the telegram, has essentially been retracing the Baudelaires' steps, I will venture a guess that "J.S." is childrens' erstwhile guardian Jerome Squalor, and that Quigley is, for the moment, operating out of Jerome's penthouse in Dark Avenue.

But as much as I like Jerome as a character, and as much kindness and love as he showed the orphans during his brief guardianship of them, I kind of hope I'm wrong.

The Baudelaires have hereto been presented as beings of love and integrity moving in a morally blank universe. Literally everyone they have encountered (with the exception of the Quagmires) has been motivated by self-interest or fear or dependence or vanity. Indeed, the books could serve as a catalog of human weaknesses. All those who could have helped them have proved false, often through no fault of their own; in most of the books there has been a figure who, while well-intentioned—e.g., Jerome—is simply ineffectual. The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.

To reveal Jerome as part of the conspiracy now—that is, to imply that he could have saved the Baudelaires, but allowed them to suffer, even used them as stalking horses for the sake of a higher game—has the paradoxical effect of diminishing him as a character, by making both his goodness and his weakness less profound. It diminishes the children as well.

In any case: I've figured out what this new storyline reminds me of—a mysterious organization, rent by schism; wheels within wheels; talented recruits, floundering their way towards the inner mysteries of the group with which they have thrown their lot—it's Millennium, minus the serial killers.

And it's genuinely, delightfully creepy. Was rereading last night Sunny's near-death scene in The Grim Grotto, where she speaks and her siblings can see the inside of her mouth lined with mushroom-caps from the fungus that's growing inside her, filling her lungs—Jesus. Knocked me on my heels, all over again.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
10:57 / 22.03.07
Just thought I'd bump this in case anyone fancied discussing the series now it's over.

Not me sadly, I recently made an attempt to get into this with the Tim Curry audiobooks and lasted about twenty minutes and then just had to stop. It was either that or find a sharp object and start cutting. Seriously. How do you people manage to read this for fun?
 
 
Dusto
12:22 / 22.03.07
Some reviewer called my book something like "A Series of Unfortunate Events" for adults, so I feel like I should check these books out just to see whether or not it was a compliment. Somehow, though, I just haven't been able to work up the motivation.
 
 
gridley
13:59 / 22.03.07
Not me sadly, I recently made an attempt to get into this with the Tim Curry audiobooks and lasted about twenty minutes and then just had to stop.

Tim Curry's reading of the books is pretty awful and painfully slow. I reckon even a slighlty below average reader could finish three whole novels in the time it takes Curry to read just one.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
17:00 / 22.03.07
Well, I certainly checked the photo of the narrator on the cover to confirm that it wasn't just some other guy with the same name reading it. Talked about phoned in... From Mars!

There was an interview with the author I heard a few years ago which, strangely, I enjoyed in direct proportion to how much I disliked the book. He read a bit and almost made it sound a decent proposition, which was why I gave this a go again.
 
 
Our Lady Has Left the Building
17:02 / 22.03.07
Lemony Snicket writes The Punisher.
 
  
Add Your Reply