|
|
I just find the criterion for "obscurity" a little amusing: I mean, there's not a lot of internet presence for, say, the New Fast Automatic Daffodils, and I've never found any of their stuff on Kazaa Lite. Does that make them "obscure"? They were on Elektra, they're listed at AMG.
Other bands I never found on Kazaa Lite, for all my repeated searching: Dub Tribe Sound System, Scruffy the Cat, Jack Frost (i.e. Steve Kilbey from the Church + Grant MacLennan from the Go-Betweens), Richard Barone, Rash of Stabbings, David Baerwald, the Bevis Frond, Ball and Pivot, Spare Snare, Angry Salad, Cactus World News, An Emotional Fish, My Drug Hell, Stupid Club, Abunai... these are all bands I've heard on the radio at one point or another: many of them were on major labels at some point. How "obscure" can they be?
Stuff that only came out on vinyl, or in the early days of CDs; "local hits," from back when that term meant something (pre-ClearChannel); stuff that was deleted from the catalog before the advent of file-sharing services (which was--what--five years ago?); are these "obscure"? Are they "underground"?
A lot of George Harrison's stuff has fell out of print during his lifetime, and was very hard to get a-hold of: was he "underground"? He was a fucking ex-Beatle fa chrissakes.
"World music" acts seem underrepresented, too. Wimme Saari, Väsen, Hedningarna, in fact many of the artists on Northside Digital... never found 'em on Kazaa Lite, despite the fact that there are free, high-quality MP3s readily available through their label's website.
What's the difference between a niche artist and an underground artist? Can anybody tell me?
Actually, the most underground artist ever is my new band. We have no website, we don't have a record out, and in fact we don't actually exist yet except in my own mind. Deep underground, man.
Which, of course, makes us better than any band you've ever heard of, because they're all sell-out hacks...
...but that's another debate. |
|
|