BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


S28 lives on in Kent?

 
 
w1rebaby
16:44 / 17.11.03
Sort of. Spot the difference between:

Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988 prohibited local authorities from "promoting" homosexuality or gay "pretended family relationships", and prevented councils spending money on educational materials and projects perceived to promote a gay lifestyle.

and

"In July 2000 Kent county council agreed a policy ... which said, 'KCC shall not publish, purchase or distribute material with the intention of promoting homosexuality'.

Tory council leader Sir Sandy Bruce-Lockhart (fantastic name) said to the Guardian...

This in no way was a statement against homosexuality, and it certainly was in no way against school sex education including an understanding of homosexuality. It was against the 'intentional promotion', which is very different.

but apparently

on the Kent Conservatives' website, a page topped with Sir Sandy's picture quotes him as saying: "We must protect our children as they grow up. We believe that Section 28 is right in prohibiting the intentional promotion of homosexuality in our schools...

..."I took legal advice in December [1999] and we are determined to continue in Kent the spirit and commitment of Section 28, irrespective of the government's intentions."


so I'm not quite sure I believe him, though that may be my cynical nature.

600 schools in Kent, apparently. Guardian story here.
 
 
Lurid Archive
17:59 / 17.11.03
I'd be interested to hear about the legaility of this, though I suspect that after muttering stuff about different values it is legally legitimate to prohibite the intentional promotion of homosexuality in schools. Whatever that means.
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
05:12 / 18.11.03
This is why I hope I never have to move back to Kent permanently. When I went to visit family at the weekend Kent Uni students were demonstrating outside County Hall in Maidstone. Quite why they were doing this on a Saturday when there was no-one there to see them except all the crap skateboarders who use the wide pavements there I don't quite understand.
 
 
William Sack
11:59 / 18.11.03
I think your cynicism is well-placed Fridge - here's the link to the article on the Kent Conservatives website refered to in the Guardian article. I think it's pretty clear where Sir Sandy is coming from:-

There is a world of difference between tolerance and understanding of individual circumstances an teaching young people that relationships are ordinary and just as good as marriage,' said Mr Bruce-Lockhart.

He said the county wanted to put its money and efforts into improving school standards through projects like after-school clubs, holiday homework classes and sports programmes rather than the kind of homosexual youth groups and teaching material favoured in other areas.

We do not think it right to spend public money furthering the interests of fashionable modernisers, apologists and particular minority groups,' he said. . Our schools are excellent but our children are growing up in a complex confusing world. We need to re-emphasise family, Christian, religious and traditional values.'


As for the legality of things, I assume that local education authorities have the power to set elements of their own curricula, and from a human rights perspective there is not much challenge to it as long as the information included in the curriculum is conveyed in an "objective, critical and pluralistic manner."

Still, it appears that Kent is currently the only LEA in the UK planning on introducing their own mini-Section 28 and I think they look rather ridiculous making their lone stand.

Anyway, thanks for linking to this Fridge; I will get onto my publishers and suggest that they don't bother trying to market my Adventures of Johnny Horsecock series to schools in Kent.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
20:04 / 19.11.03
Surely it's impossible to promote tolerance of something without promoting the something itself?

These politicians are the kind of shits that need to try holding hands with a man in a street on salford and see what the reaction is there. If the system was any good it would teach that gay people, for FUCK'S SAKE, are hardly any different to straight people and everyone should get respect.

"Yeah, there's these, um, people, and we think they are terrible and their sexualitys are against everything we beleive, but, you know, you shouldn't be nasty to them."
 
 
All Acting Regiment
20:09 / 19.11.03
I posted the above while pissed off about said shithead politicians- anything in there anyone finds offensive I apologise for.
 
  
Add Your Reply