Well, your media is right that it's a pretty popular story over here, but mostly in blogs. But the people I'd expect to be in an uproar over an actual sexual assault (i.e. feminist blogs) seem mostly to be making fun of Bush's borderline-creepy blundericiousness rather than outraged, so I'm not sure how seriously the US freedia are taking sexual assault claims either. If Chancellor Merkel appeared to read the situation that way, that would be another matter entirely.
But of course, politically speaking, she can't, can she? How would German media respond, do you think, if she said Bush had been inappropriate in a way she felt was sexual? How about the US media? How would an effort at seeking redress be received? Framing this as an infringement of personal boundaries which was sexually inappropriate is extremely inconvenient for everyone, and many women, faced with a situation where asserting that wrongdoing has occurred is more traumatic than the actual occurrence, opt to let things slide. Which, of course, enables creepy people to continue being creepy, because they don't understand they've done wrong.
Not that that's necessarily what's happening here; if Chancellor Merkel is able to shrug off (sorry) something I wouldn't, that's fine. I just wanted to suggest that situations where women are in high profile positions of authority can paradoxically make them less able to report if their boundaries have been violated. |