BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Barbelith- community or message board?

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
---
10:58 / 08.08.07
So where's Tom, and what does he think? I think I started having problems around the time I first joined to be honest, but that's a given among many of you I guess. For content though, I've always loved the place and have found out a ton of stuff. If the way people are accepted onto the board is changed or sped up to allow more people to join I think it could start getting better, but if it doesn't I don't really see anything but this place turning into a graveyard over the next few years.

There was a time when I'd have hated the idea of that, but now I'm kind of neutral on the whole thing, after giving up on any attempt to mix in with people around here and just checking back when I'm either bored or need to find something out. There's still a decent amount of cool people around here though (a lot more than I thought in my first couple of years here.) and for information on a good few subjects it's great, so it'd be a shame to see the place turn even quieter and fade away.

Again though, what does Tom think? I know he's busy and all, but he used to post more than he does now didn't he? Has he given up on the place aswell?
 
 
This Sunday
11:04 / 08.08.07
I do want to be clear, I have a different definition of 'community' perhaps, but I don't disagree with the notion that the board is broken/nonfunctioning, or that it's displeasing people. I just figured someone who's not as displeased should say so, and state a case for why, so I did.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
11:30 / 08.08.07
Not getting the xenophobia, myself. I'd be more convinced if there weren't threads to pimp people's Myspaces and Livjournals, and indeed if there was not a "Livejournal replacement thread" kicking around for when LJ is down. I haven't heard anyone say anything about facebook, except for Princess Swashbuckling, who wanted to kennel trolls on it, and Flyboy, who notes that the fact that the BNP has a facebook community does not endear it to him - there may have been something in the Late Shift - I would rather stand three times in the line of battle than read through the archives, though.

Something that DN says, I think, or at least alludes to, is that Barbelith as a community has developed a pretty good immune response to racism, sexism, homo-, trans- and sundry other phobias. It is far from perfect, and it betrays the bias of its general angles, but it is, I think, something that should be preserved, and actually reinforced. This is Barbelith's USP - it is no longer true to its original aims, really, but it does provide, as far as I know uniquely, a general discussion environment in which a wide range of bigotry is subject to criticism.

In terms of what went notionally wrong, I think the breaking of the joining, and the never-working of the banning, have caused enormous problems. I agree with Randy that Google is a huge issue, as well. The applications we do get, now, are primarily from people who want to talk about chaos magic or the Invisibles - essentially, people who are lookign for a Grant Morrison fan site or a chaos magic board, and who are done no favours by fetching up here instead. Or people who fit in perfectly well with the board ideologically, but cant the discussion gratuitously towards comic books, sci-fi films and/or magic. The deadness of the Head Shop and the Switchboard would have been unthinkable a few years ago, but the general expectation either of no response or of a very low standard of response have largely choked them off.

At present I think that Barbelith is a discussion forum, certainly, but it is also just a way of keeping people in one place, so that if we can get a working successor board together it is easy to give people an overview of what it will be like and let them decide whether they want to join it. That successor board will hopefully have open and more anonymous membership, robust moderation and banning, and may not only start us off with a fairly clean slate, but will also retain and energise good people here, make it easier for good members to join (and for bad members to be disposed of) and possibly entice some former members of Barbelith to check it out. If some continuity between this successoorboard and this board is to be assumed though, it is probably in our best interests not to let Barbelith itself go completely to shit, and to maintain some overarching expectations both of the standard of discussion and the topics under discussion - which is, incidentally, why the process of challenging actions like those of Kay, Mathlete or Claris Dancers is still valid, even if it does at times give the disspiriting feeling that the place is at its liveliest when people are having a fight.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
11:37 / 08.08.07
Yeah, Barbelith's Headshop and Switchboard are two unique places on the internet, which I really value, where you can get real critical discussion of ideas or news stories. On the BBC or the Guardian websites you get "Is Religion Bad??", or "Should Immigrants go Home" which help no-one. Our discussions, whilst not being perfect, are better than a lot of places - except, there aren't enough people and there's not enough activity, as Haus says. I'm not actually sure what anyone's supposed to do with this information, but if there is a problem here then I think the deadness of the HS and SB are it.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
11:42 / 08.08.07
You really don't think there's a mild xenophobia here about other message boards in general? To the point that, the good is sometimes disregarded along with the very very bad, whenever there's discussion of, say, Facebook or the forums at Comic Book Resources? An immediate reaction of how Barbelith is different, stick with Barbelith?

Well, I think the times when Facebook has been flagged up have all been when something problematic has appeared there. I've been having a ton of interesting, fair, valuable debates there as well as headdesk wars with idiots.

There just is a big difference between the two sites - Facebook is primarily about social networking, keeping in touch, and about defining yourself and what you beleive, which is fine; but it's also why so many of the groups and the debates on the message boards consist of people unwilling to do a proper reasonable examination of whatever topic, who insist on pushing their own views and trolling.

I would like there to be more places like Barbelith, beleive me, it's just that most discussion places emphasise free speech over true speech.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
12:07 / 08.08.07
I'm not actually sure what anyone's supposed to do with this information, but if there is a problem here then I think the deadness of the HS and SB are it.


And again the intake affects this - because if most of the discussion is about comic books and films of comic books, with a side of chaos magic, people will so it as a place to discuss comic books, films of comic books and chaos magic. And, for that matter, Head Shop and Switchboard end up choked with lengthy diversions where the contributors find themselves explaining eight times to somebody who came in to talk about the magix or Robotix (support story in Transformers UK, fact fans!) why lesbians might not want to help them to understand their sapphic rites better by letting them watch, before killing themselves.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
13:39 / 08.08.07
Is there then a way we could get more people in who want to talk current affairs or theory? I mean there's a large, reasonably reasonable contingent of web-users who like to talk about current affairs, out there among the howlers.

I should also add that though I'd like there to be more activity in HS and SB that's not for a lack of quality on the part of our current crew.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
14:25 / 08.08.07
Ideas about trying to actively recruit new people are and have been pointless for as long as we have, and this has been said many times now, an admissions process which gives the appearance of being based on merit but is not. This is off-putting to anyone who prefers boards with open membership, and the lack of actual quality control puts off those who want a strict admissions process instead.
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
14:35 / 08.08.07
And again the intake affects this - because if most of the discussion is about comic books and films of comic books, with a side of chaos magic, people will so it as a place to discuss comic books, films of comic books and chaos magic. And, for that matter, Head Shop and Switchboard end up choked with lengthy diversions where the contributors find themselves explaining eight times to somebody who came in to talk about the magix or Robotix (support story in Transformers UK, fact fans!) why lesbians might not want to help them to understand their sapphic rites better by letting them watch, before killing themselves.

While I appreciate there's a lot of rather silly people in the wide world who read teh comix and watch/read SF, there's also a lot of very smart people. It might just be your phrasing here, but this reads as a mite condescending, as if the Head Shop and the Switchboard are 'the real Barbelith' or something, and discussion elsewhere is ephemeral and somehow not part of what makes this a remarkable community. Apologies if I've misread.

Personally, it's the diversity of the board (both in the people who post here, and the subjects they post on) that make it a special place for me. There are very, very few places on the web where I can answer someone's question about their broken Mac on one forum, look at someone elses' amazing webcomic on another (hat-tip to theFool), ask for help defining my politics on another, and, if the fancy took me, find out what on earth a sigil is.

Somehow attempting to 'get more current-affairs folk' in the door doesn't strike me as the answer. Personally, I don't post much in the Switchboard because I use up most of my outrage writing angry letters to my MP about ID cards, and I don't post to the Head Shop much because, frankly, I don't feel intellectually energetic enough for it most of the time.

I think the issue isn't the shape which Barbelith has grown into. We're not pruning a bush here - 'Oh, no, too much comix, snip that off'. To stretch a metaphor, the soil is exhausted. There's very little light and no rain, because we've effectively walled off the sky, because we don't want to bother with weeding.

I wasn't here during the Troll Wars, or whatever they were, so perhaps I'm naive about how bad it got. I don't have the answer for how to manage new members effectively, but I'm sure we can come up with something if we try hard enough. I'm certainly willing to give it a go. Heck, I used to design organisational processes for a living.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
14:42 / 08.08.07
There's very little light and no rain, because we've effectively walled off the sky, because we don't want to bother with weeding.

Because we haven't got any hands, and as such weeding is a slow process, to keep our metaphor straight.
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
14:50 / 08.08.07
Because we haven't got any hands, and as such weeding is a slow process, to keep our metaphor straight.

Ah. Seen through the prism of metaphor, I'm beginning to see the issue. When you say 'haven't got any hands' do you mean that distributed moderation makes it slow to calm fights, or is it that the power of banning is reserved to Tom?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
14:52 / 08.08.07
I don't post to the Head Shop much because, frankly, I don't feel intellectually energetic enough for it most of the time.

I don't post to the Head Shop because most of the time I can't remember enough to be able to write a post. It is a bit limited to people who actually have a memory for facts and theories.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
15:08 / 08.08.07
It might just be your phrasing here, but this reads as a mite condescending, as if the Head Shop and the Switchboard are 'the real Barbelith' or something, and discussion elsewhere is ephemeral and somehow not part of what makes this a remarkable community. Apologies if I've misread.

Not so much misread as projected, I think. The point is not that Haus or anyone else wants the Head Shop or Switchboard to reign supreme and everything else to be sidelined. The problem is that those two fora are currently pretty dead, when they used to be a vital part of the board.
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
15:25 / 08.08.07
Not so much misread as projected, I think. The point is not that Haus or anyone else wants the Head Shop or Switchboard to reign supreme and everything else to be sidelined. The problem is that those two fora are currently pretty dead, when they used to be a vital part of the board.

Fair enough. But I think regardless of which parts of Barbelith are currently quieter than the grave, showing occasional signs of life or even relatively lively (Convo always has something going on, even if it has slow patches), the core issue remains the same. The whole board is suffering from lack of numbers (there may be 5000 registered ficsuits, but I doubt there's over 100 who post regularly) and lack of participation, with threads grinding to a halt after a couple of dozen posts. I remember someone saying they felt like a kid standing in an empty playground in the Music forum, shouting 'come play with me!', and I think that's fairly representative of the experiences of most people who joined the board in the last couple of years.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
11:42 / 09.08.07
I don't post to the Head Shop because most of the time I can't remember enough to be able to write a post. It is a bit limited to people who actually have a memory for facts and theories.

Hmm. I'm not sure if I could produce a full rendition of Zizek on request, but isn't it also open to pull apart things people say? Like, just quoting someone and showing hole in a given argument, without neccesarily quoting from another theory?
 
 
Tryphena Absent
12:05 / 09.08.07
Sure but if you don't understand the original theory and someone's referring to it loosely you're not going to know if your criticism is relevant, it could be addressed in the theory in any number of ways or by the theorist elsewhere.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
14:04 / 09.08.07
Good point.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
15:22 / 09.08.07
Yeah, but in that case could one not ask questions to find out more about the theory, then go from there? Although I think this is a bit of a non-issue, since the only proper theory-discussion thread recently has been Alain Badiou. The Head Shop doesn't really have a lot of that sort of discussion any more, or at least at present.
 
 
Ticker
17:58 / 09.08.07
so, iffin' someone had server space and time to do the set up, do we have a blueprint of the replacement site?
do we need to test a few versions of available bb software or do people really want custom?
 
 
Katherine
06:59 / 10.08.07
I enjoy Barbelith the way it is, I love the fact that there are no signatures to posts as to me it makes reading a thread clearer and more coherent. The only change I would like in an ideal world would be a quote button to make things even more clear however that is a small thing although if we are wishing a way of linking the name on the quote to that person’s profile so that the name on the quote changes when the ficsuit changes name would be good too.

It is plain to me even though we have in theory 5,000 members this is not a true figure of actual users. We could go though the membership list and if someone hasn’t used Barbelith in x amount of time perhaps a polite email could be sent to the member asking if they still wish to be a member. A website I am on does this if you haven’t been on the site in a year, if an email bounces and the person hasn’t posted in a year then the member is removed from the posters list and placed on another list which has a notice if you wish the account to be reopened then please email Admin. If you haven’t posted in two years and ignore the emails then again this happens to them as well. The important part is if the email bounces and the person has forgotten their password they would probably just rejoin under a different name, as they can’t use the email option to get back the password for the original account. At no point are the old posts from that member deleted so the threads don’t change which is also important.

I agree with people that we do need a better way of processing applications to the site but before that happens we need a faster way of getting rid of trolls and also stopping them from re-applying or having numerous ficsuits. Like others I was not around when Barbelith had its worse troll problems, I have read threads from that time (I believe there is a thread here in Policy linking a few of them) and I wouldn’t want to ever see that on Barbelith.

But despite the above two paragraphs I actually quite enjoy Barbelith as it is, it just needs some fine tuning here and there.
 
 
Tsuga
01:33 / 11.08.07
Beyond Head Shop and Switchboard, jesus, what about the AF&D and BC&W forums? I don't know if the Art forum ever enjoyed the same levels of activity that the others did, but I'm a bit surprised, judging from the type of people that usually hang around here, that there's not more posting there.
I know why I don't start threads often, especially in more didactic or thoughtful forums, and I suspect it's the reason why many other people don't: I'm not going to start something I can't stick with and participate in. I feel more free to pop into something and try to contribute, but I feel like it's a commitment around here to start a serious thread, and I don't want to Coffee Talk it— "Hierarchies in human interaction: functional necessity or monkey-style domination ladders? Discuss." —and see ya later. There are many things I'd really love to either get into or at least see got into by others, but honestly, I'd feel responsible to stick with it, which would be hard to follow through on. Purely because of time, for me. I'm curious how many others are in the same boat?
I don't know, though, how much of the current lack of activity is because of low traffic or a sense of lethargy. I wish I could feel more useful and productive here, personally.
 
 
Spatula Clarke
08:42 / 11.08.07
Can we try and keep the focus here on the notion of community, guys? There are lots of otehr threads in Policy for talking about the lack of activity on the board, but I think they're two slightly different things.
 
 
All Acting Regiment
20:04 / 11.08.07
I certainly feel a more communal connection with the people on here than I do anywhere else. I'm more likely to type as if talking among friends here.
 
 
Spaniel
10:24 / 16.08.07
but it is also just a way of keeping people in one place, so that if we can get a working successor board together

Certainly one of the reasons I'm hanging around.
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
12:00 / 16.08.07
So, I think we've got a good feel of the issues, and some of the suggested solutions. How do we actually get started with this? Policy is seeing two or three posts a day, so getting a discussion going on these issues, never mind deciding anything, is like walking through treacle.

And ultimately nothing happens without Tom being in on it and agreeing.

I view this place as a real community, both in the cyberspacey meeting of minds way, and the IRL meetups, which I fully intend to keep going to, as long as they keep happening. I'm far from an old-timer here, so it's not like I even remember the 'good ol' days', but I find it incredibly frustrating when posts in 'active' threads are two or three or ten hours apart sometimes. Maintaining that sense of community is tough when it's not so much interaction as a very, very slow game of linguistic chess.

There's dozens of 'how do we fix Barbelith' threads. There's dozens of suggestions. There's dozens of issues. How do we start dealing with them?
 
 
Spaniel
12:47 / 16.08.07
Well, I think you might be missing Paleface's recent comments about how he's working on new board software right now.

That's very good news, afaic.
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
12:50 / 16.08.07
I missed that. That sounds very interesting. Got a link? (don't want to get into discussion on Moses-like migration of users vs porting of site content etc if there's already a thread for it).
 
 
Spaniel
12:51 / 16.08.07
Linky
 
 
Happy Dave Has Left
12:55 / 16.08.07
Thanks Boboss, that is exciting.
 
 
gu
16:45 / 22.08.07
But don't most successful internet message board/lists create a sense of community?

While that's true, Barbelith seems to have a sense of community that has never been achieved with any other forum I go to, although RevSoft comes pretty close, in my opinion. From lurking a bit before joining, I saw that Head Shop and Switchboard are very unique places on the Internet. While many forums have a "serious discussion" board, Head Shop still seems disparate.

If Barbelith was a very active forum, like Nintendo NSider or something similar, some sense of the community may be lost; On NSider, threads are considered "old" by the time they hit page three or so on the message listing. From what I've seen so far, certain debates from 2002 and 2003 are still being discussed. Big threads don't seem to be simply forgotten on Barbelith.
 
 
Spaniel
17:02 / 22.08.07
I think that's to do with having a slew of very long-term members and the fact that many, many Barbelith debates are either cyclical or worth revisiting.
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply