|
|
The ever (or at the very least, often) wonderful Matthew Norman's Diary piece from today's Guardian: (posted rather than linked cos only small and interwebnet especially slow today):
Matthew Norman
Wednesday October 22, 2003
The Guardian
Whether or not you saw BBC1's The Secret Policeman last night, you will doubtless be aware both of its content - secretly filmed footage of racist police recruits - and David Blunkett's response. Our Daily Mail-worshipping home secretary was disgusted, of course, but not so much with the police as with the Beeb's undercover reporting methods and failure to send him an advance copy. Priorities, priorities ... and Marina Hyde rings the Home Office to say how refreshing it is to find a senior Labour politician devoting more anger and energy towards the BBC than the exposure of grotesque racism in the police. "Ri-ight," says John. Perhaps you'd confirm that, had secret footage been obtained from Pol Pot's killing fields, David would have raged at the reporters who got it for not going through the proper accreditation channels? "Look, we have stressed how seriously we regard allegations of racism." But you haven't, have you? "We've made great progress with this issue. But equally, David Blunkett raised another issue..." Equally? So a policeman in a home-made Ku Klux Klan hood saying he wants to "eradicate the whole fucking country" of Asians and you not getting an advance copy are equal? "Both are massively significant," says John. "There's no pecking order." I think you'll find there is, John. Now, good day.
Although I do think "racism rife in Her Majesty's Constabulary" is something of a non-story... |
|
|