BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Magick and Religion

 
 
Quantum
12:11 / 16.10.03
Is Magic a religion of one? Is there a clear dividing line between magic and religion?

I believe it is a similar distinction to that made between pop and rock music, the boundary is blurred and definitions difficult to pin down, but there is a difference, otherwise this would be the Religion forum.

To compare religion to politics for a moment, and faiths to parties, I may share many of the beliefs of a group but disagree with some, and thus not identify myself as a member of that group. So I may be liberal but I don't fully support the liberal party, or I may have similar views to a catholic but support contraception and so am not a catholic.
I could be in a religion of one (nobody shares all my beliefs) and pray, have faith and whatnot and have nothing to do with magic. Conversely many magicians pooh-pooh religion and disassociate themselves from it completely.
But there are many who commune with gods, talk to angels, worship deities and meet up to worship (covens for example) to whom the dividing line is less clear. Add to that the religious origin of many magical practices (e.g. kaballah) and you have a right old muddle.

Is there a difference to you? Do you seperate your religion and magic, or consider them complementary, or even one and the same? How do we distinguish between one and the other?
 
 
Seth
21:34 / 16.10.03
Most of the magic I know I learned in Church. I've been reminded over the last month just how important those roots are to me, about how they have formed the bedrock to everything I have investigated since (my shamanic practises, learning on the qabalah, interest in divination, NLP - not an exhaustive list).

I choose not to draw a dividing line between religion and magic, largely because most of the people who seem intent on making such distinctions do so either out of misinformed ignorance or bad personal experience. Before anyone claims that the former is the domain of the religious and the latter the domain of the occultists, you'd actually be amazed at how many religious converts say that they had a terrible experience with magic, or how many occultists make sweeping generalisations about religion that have practically no truth. Note that I'm only using these artificial, unhelpful categories because I'm referring to my experiences of people who genuinely do think in such a simplistic manner.

I'm struggling to find anything that's purely a phenomena of either magic or religion, or any means of finding a useful or non-generalised distinction. I'd be interested to hear any working definitions, or reasoning as to why such categories are worthwhile.

There's a comment from macrophage in the From tiny thought-forms massive gods do grow ... maybe thread: "Organised religion has ruined alot of spirituality." It's half the story at most (organised religion has added to the world's experience of spirituality immeasurably), the standard response of a lot of practitioners on the subject. It's easy to see where the opinion comes from: a lot of people in a lot of religious movements have ceased to view their faith as being a work in progress. Religion has to be flexible, it has to be subject to revision, has to be broad based enough to handle diversity. However, there's nought that'll be solved by division and shit flinging.
 
 
Salamander
21:40 / 16.10.03
I think that religion is an insanity you share with many, magick one shared with few. But that could be said about any pair of ideas. I think magick must of spawned religion, but not in the way that many cynics argue, to dupe the masses into land ownership and taxation, but in the beggining to give the common person a deeper connection to the community and to give him a few simple spells to make his life easier and to give him piece of mind. How far it has fallen from that ideal, if that was the situation.
 
 
SMS
23:20 / 16.10.03
The term religion is often used to refer specifically to a set of beliefs, similar to a moral system. To be Christian means, to many, to believe that X is true, and to practise Christianity is to engage in the magical (if anything is magical) as well as the non-magical (if anything is non-magical).

Magic, by contrast, often means the practise itself, not tied to a set of beliefs.

I think that, if this distinction is made, it probably falls apart after close examination. Any specifiic magical practise is tied to a specific belief, even if it's chaos magic, tied to a framework that uses the belief-system model. (Or magic built out of the belief that reality is subjective &c.) As far as moral considerations go, I find it difficult to believe that someone practising magic wouldn't discover some of the same spiritual or moral states that religions have found.

On the other hand, it seems perfectly sensible for someone to call hirself a Unitarian Chaos Magician. Or a Christian who practises Shamanic techniques, and so on. So I guess I agree with the pop music/rock music analogy.
 
 
illmatic
09:23 / 17.10.03
The first thing that comes to mind for me with this subject is the idea of the community vs. the individual, with religion having a communal and social role, while traditionally, magic seems to have been more about an individuals personal realisations and “quest”. Obviously this distinction doesn’t hold, if we look at a subject like Shamanism which defines itself through a community function - but then again, shamanic ideas have only been kicking about the Western magical scene since the late 80’s – I think traditionally that model holds, the “Dr Faustus”/personal quest for knowledge idea. A friend of mine has criticised this model quite extensively as basically being very narcissistic and self obsessed, and I think he’s got a point. We define ourselves by our relationships to a community to a degree so why shouldn’t our spirituality be part of this? Doesn’t “true will” equate with finding a place in the world, or is it solely personal realisations that matter? I think the personal quest = self thing is very Western. Perhaps it has it’s origins in Christianity somewhere, with it’s pushing of other paths underground, the persecution of witches and so on, I don’t know. Maybe the introduction of the shamic ideal is interesting because it comes from places without that social/historical baggage.

Personally, I have met some of the Xtian hating black clad legions of doom and gloom and I think most of them are twats, they strike me as still going through a moody adolescent phase with regard to magick. Their opposition to religion is simply the knee jerk reaction they have to any perceived orthodoxy – it always surprised me how people who profess to be paradigm hopping Chaos magicians can have this narrow minded hatred of Christianity etc. “Go where thou fearest most” (a mangled AO Spare quote). While I think that there’s a lot in Christianity to criticise – both in terms of aspects of it’s historical influence and say, the Right Wing in the USA today, it obviously isn’t one homogenous evil mass – on one level, it’s a lot of different people articulating different things through a shared language and set of symbols, and these maybe the same experiences I’m having, only the language I’m using is different. I’d hope I could find ground to share between my-whatever-it-is and the experiences and feelings of Christian and religious people. This seems to be the way forward to me, to emphasis and build bridges with what I see as the positive aspects of religious thought, rather than perpetuating divisions by dismissing all of it.

I
 
 
illmatic
09:36 / 17.10.03
I'm reminded that a certain well-known London mage used to flog copies of the Spritualist Asociation's newpaper (and the SA operate in a very Christian framework) at moots because he felt it was the nearest thing to Shamanic practice - community based "ancestor worship" in a sense, with some healing and so on. If that isn't magic, what is?
 
 
Seth
09:51 / 17.10.03
Hermes Nuclear: I think magick must of spawned religion, but not in the way that many cynics argue, to dupe the masses into land ownership and taxation, but in the beggining to give the common person a deeper connection to the community and to give him a few simple spells to make his life easier and to give him piece of mind. How far it has fallen from that ideal, if that was the situation.

There are still religious movements that work in this way. It's such a vast and complex mass of people, ideas, movements and practises that you'll still find pretty much anything you care to look for under the banner of *organised religion.* A misnomer, really - even the most structured movements that I've encountered have all sorts of messy, interesting stuff bubbling under the surface.
 
 
Ria
15:52 / 17.10.03
read a theory that had it that magic comes about from the appropriation of the good parts of religion when discarding the parts that you don't like.
 
 
cusm
17:06 / 17.10.03
I tend to look at it as magick being the set of tools which one can use to build religion. Like if religion was physics, magick would be math.

However, anyone who calls themselves "a magician" is technically following a religion, as the identification with a particular world view is a very base definition of religion itself. So, it gets a bit muddled. I mean, from that perspective, science is a religion, too.
 
 
SMS
21:16 / 17.10.03
appropriation of the good parts of religion when discarding the parts that you don't like.

hmmmm. The forces of good battle the forces I dislike.
 
 
Seth
09:18 / 18.10.03
read a theory that had it that magic comes about from the appropriation of the good parts of religion when discarding the parts that you don't like.

This process happens all the time within religion, too.

I tend to look at it as magick being the set of tools which one can use to build religion. Like if religion was physics, magick would be math.

That's a great way of explaining things. Gonna have a think about that...
 
  
Add Your Reply