|
|
Disclaimer: most of this is cross-posted from the Fame Academy thread in Film, TV & Theatre. But Alex/FA has been mentioned in a Music thread, and this is probably the place to talk about her anyway now that the show is over.
So angsty, publicity-shy 19 year old lesbian Alex Parks from Cornwall won Fame Academy 2003. At this early stage, it's probably too early to answer the question "is her stuff any good", because she hasn't released anything apart from a few tracks on the FA album. The question does seem to loom, however: what if anything does her success 'say' about reality TV pop?
I'd like, if possible, to move past knee-jerk objections to the concept of shows like Fame Academy and Pop Idol (but since that's a pipe dream, this might be a good place to discuss them). If Alex and her music = manufactured, anodyne, homogenised angst, then who is she/it being manufactured by, given the lack of any real change of direction in her image/sound since entering the Academy - her parents?
Let's be clear about something: in six months, Alex could be as annoying as Dido - I think coming out of something like Fame Academy, people always have the potential to go either way, as it were. But within the context of the show/competition, I think the fact that she not only won, but was a clear favourite from quite early on, is very interesting. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the British music-buying public is into gentle angst right now, but I think it is surprising and encouraging that someone who combines the specific qualities of youth, angst, vulnerability, androgeny, queer sexuality and - well, 'uniqueness' for want of a better term - can be so instantly accepted and championed. And she *is* a little unique - unlike Peter, she hasn't just been slavishly aping her heroines (Ani DiFranco & Annie Lennox) thank God, and she's not boring enough to be Tracy Chapman or Suzanne Vega... Beth Orton sometimes springs to mind, but I think Alex is just that bit more intense than any of these people - there's that disarming thing she does sometimes when she just seems to stop caring about how her vocals 'sound' and start belting it out with a scary degree of emotion (like when she ripped into "but I'm not the only one!" in her cover of 'Imagine', which almost made that dire song tolerable) - you could call it emo, I guess, although I wouldn't (I like her too much). I think you can also make a comparison to T.a.t.u., if you're not entirely cynical, in that they clearly did appeal to teen/pre-teen girls who may or may not have been questioning/discovering their sexuality - except Alex doesn't have the creepy/discomforting aspects of exploitation (perceived or genuine), voyeurism, etc.
Apparently her single, 'Maybe That's What It Takes' will be out on Nov 17. It's not bad at all, I think, as odes to (probably) unrequited love go. I'll watch/listen to what she does next, with interest. |
|
|