|
|
Well, the person who "authorised" this thread, whose unilateral decision to decide for the board you seem to have no problem with, has the right to vote on a moderation action. The fact that this thread remains is a testamnet to the fact that moderation is distributed. One other person used their veto, the thread remains undeleted, I appear not to have mind-control powers, which will sort out one problem, and all is well.
Fantastic, Haus. And I'm glad to see this representative approach in action. But you're either avoiding my concerns about your caustic handling of this thread or aren't aware of it. As moderator you do have more capability to change threads, more power as it were, than persons who are not moderators. And as such, what you say and how you say it has impact. mephisto went through all the seemingly appropriate channels, in so far as any of us would. He asked a moderator if it was okay. And the go-ahead was given. So either the moderator erred in regard to Barbepolicy to this or the policy was so vague as to make a clear decision difficult. In both cases, the Policy thread is a great place to clear this all up.
As such, clearly I am not the final arbiter and therefore your snide and adolescent point appears to be rather deflated. The thread will remain for as long as people wish it to remain.
How strange. Several statements back, you were gung-ho to see this thread disappear. And now that a thread has popped up in Policy to address these various issues, now you're fine with this thread being here? Which is it?
I also appreciate the fact that you consider my points "snide and adolescent" but you're well within your rights to snidely imply persons here as individuals who piss themselves when excited. Completely uncalled for, Haus.
I submit entirely and happily to that state of affairs, because unlike you I have no wish to impose my wish to dictate what appears or does not appear on the board according to personal fiat. I raised some potential legal issues which the moderators are free to address as they wish. As Jack Fear mentions in the Policy thread, when money is introduced things get more complicated.
And yes, it would seem that you have decided, by fiat, that "Since Mephisto has managed on average one post per month since his suit was registered, it seems unlikely that this is a relationship based on trust", a logic I simply don't follow. So now number of posts is the requisite for being trusted in this place? If you have not come to this assertion on your own Haus then obviously I must have missed the Policy thread where this was established. Something else I can look in Policy for.
So, do you care to address these legal issues, Distended?
I sure would, Haus. And again, the conversation regarding a Marketplace for Barbelith and how that should be formed is going on right now. In Policy. I'm all for clearing this up as I think the confusion will just cause another conflict regarding the Barbe-tude towards sales here.
I realise that it is very galling when other people disagree with you, but you may want to muster a slightly stronger argument than anger that your beliefs are not universal.
What have I done to make you think I'm angry, Haus? As a matter of fact, I'm genuinely curious to see where the conversation regarding these issues goes. |
|
|