BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Iraq, a hard place - media thread

 
 
Not Here Still
18:13 / 23.09.03
I'm intending this as a thread about media issues in Iraq generally to stop cluttering up the switchboard (and possibly because I let my blog die and now regret it...)

Perhaps it could be merged with Nick's Amanpour thread?

Anyway Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya banned; for incitement to violence or freedom of speech?

You decide. As they say on Big Brother, and every other TV station which isn't showing 'masked men calling for resistance.'

Hey... Why not just show the men, but have actors speak their words? That stopped terrorism in Britain, didn't it?

Does TV incite violence, or just highlight some issues that people would rather sweep under the carpet?
 
 
Nematode
19:00 / 23.09.03
Well I usually feel fairly violent whenever I watch it, so hopefully yes.
 
 
grant
20:55 / 23.09.03
Nick, I'll see your al-Jazeera story and raise you a nutty Democratic congressman.

Quote: "We may need a few credible Baghdad Bobs to undo the harm done by our media. I'm afraid it is killing our troops."
 
 
Not Here Still
17:05 / 24.09.03
Grant, I'' see you getting my name wrong and try not to raise the matter

What a tosser that guy is. His argument appears to be that the US media should be reporting happy clappy stories, admittedly as well as the bad news, because the current stories are 'hurting our troops.'

Personally, I'd suggest that things like, y'know, bullets do that job...
 
 
Not Here Still
17:34 / 24.09.03
Reporters Sans Frontieres are making a big fuss over the al Jazeera story.


More available on that here: "This decision is without any doubt a blow to press freedom," the Paris-based group's general secretary Robert Menard said in a statement received here.

"When media such as Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya give a voice to extremist political parties calling for violent and armed acts, they themselves are not guilty of inciting violence," Menard said.



They are also a touch angry about the Pentagon's decision to clear those who killed a cameraman filming in a sensitive place.

The official explanation was they thought he had a grenade launcher, rather than a camera. FOR FUCK'S SAKE.
 
 
Not Here Still
18:04 / 26.09.03
With almost painful irony, a day after Rush Limbaugh said something along the lines of 'the Western media are never targeted because they are lefty pinkos who do the terrorists' job for them' - this happens
 
 
ibis the being
18:26 / 12.11.04
On Salon today...

Will CBS now dust off Saddam-nukes story?

Now that the election is over, is it safe for CBS' "60 Minutes" to finally air its famously yanked investigation into how the Bush administration either knowingly deceived the American public into supporting the war with Iraq by playing up Saddam Hussein's nuclear capabilities or was grossly naive? The segment, reported by Ed Bradley, was shelved at the last minute and pushed off until after the election, with CBS news chief Andrew Heyward announcing it would be "inappropriate" for the story to air at a time Americans were pondering their presidential pick.

According to a spokesman for "60 Minutes," the report has not been rescheduled post-election, and that "60 Minutes" producers and reporters continue to work on the segment. That suggests changes may be made to the report that was completely finished, edited, and screened by Salon in September. At that time, the unusually long 30-minute investigation, which the White House refused to cooperate with, centered on how forged documents purporting to show that Iraq had purchased yellowcake uranium from the African country Niger came to be the centerpiece for the Bush administration's rationale for war, thereby allowing officials to mistakenly claim Hussein would soon have a nuclear bomb.

The irony is that originally, the Bradley piece was slotted for a Sept. 8 airing, but got bumped in order to make room for CBS' hot story about Bush's service in the National Guard, which turned out to be based on questionable documents. Soon after that story became engulfed in controversy -- and the network was besieged by complaints from Republicans -- CBS announced Bradley's piece was too controversial to air prior to the election, despite the fact that two weeks earlier it was deemed fine for a Sept. 8 broadcast.

CBS' concession left longtime journalists shaking their heads in disbelief. As Chris Hedges, the veteran New York Times war correspondent, recently told Salon, "I was disheartened, but not surprised. The press has been successfully cowed by this administration."

-- Eric Boehlert

[08:58 PST, Nov. 12, 2004]
 
 
Not Here Still
19:35 / 18.11.04
Oh yeah, Iraq, the media, libel, Gorge George Galloway:

Guardian

Beeb

I'm not linking Telegraph stories on the case. And I'm not a fan of either them or Galloway, to tell you the truth...
 
 
Nobody's girl
12:55 / 24.11.04
Heartbreaking BBC story from journalist embedded with marines in Fallujah.
 
  
Add Your Reply