Tom pushed me into moderating. Way back, when the call first went up for individuals to take on duties in specific parts of the board, I kept my head down and specifically didn't volunteer (not sure if it's tied in with my job, but I tend to avoid assuming responsibility where at all possible). If I recall rightly, the sneaky so-and-so just went ahead and made me a moderator in the Policy equivalent and I thought 'mmm, better give it a go'.
The original point of moderators was, I think, to tend individual threads, steering them gently back on topic and hiving off promising side-discussions into threads of their own. More 'gardener' than 'park ranger', really. I was (and suspect I continue to be) something of an uphill gardener, dignifying my general laziness with a hands-off 'less is more' philosophy. Other than occasionally starting new topics, I tended very much toward reactive rather than proactive. Actually, having subsequently experienced a variety of alternative moderation styles, I do now think 'faintly negligent' is, on balance, the way to go.
Andrew's persistent abuse of the board led, inevitably, to changes in the entire moderating system - as is well documented elsewhere. Rather than merely approving the typo-corrections of others (I've fixed the odd html link, but I've never learned resizing), I became embroiled in what seemed like neverending, deadeningly circular discussions of how best to contain the problem. Tom 'promoted' Grant and myself to the role of Admin (I think my overall lack of moderation was misperceived as fair and judicious moderation), and a new era of post/thread deletion began...
We have an established policy of deleting all posts by Andrew and his fictionsuits; in practice, it's very much a case of deleting those we can be bothered rooting out (usually the especially obviously trollsome stuff - the 'niggers/bitches - haha, I'm joking' threads), and my energy and enthusiasm for this tend to fluctuate. Andrew aside, I suppose the bulk of what I do is agreeing to the self-editing of others. I've added abstracts here and there, but I don't attempt to correct spelling/punctuation. There've been other trolls, of course, and we've found other ways of dealing with them; some of these have been quite inventive, and I've enjoyed contributing to this.
Periodically, as I get fed up and bored with Barbelith as a whole, I get fed up and bored with moderating. I fear I'm an inconsistent moderator, going through spells of logging in daily or staying away for weeks on end. Unfortunately, the most recent bouts of reengagement have been when I've been dragged back by some moderation crisis or other - or, more personally, when Andrew decided to make me the target of legal (and other) threats. This - combined with the sporadic PM flurries accusing me of either being Haus or being his hopelessly-compromised "buddy" - gives a rather jaundiced view of Barbelith, and I must admit I've been thinking more and more of late of asking Tom for 'demotion', of some time away from being a moderator.
Being a moderator definitely alters the way one posts. There's a pressure to at least attempt to be 'Statesmanlike' (yeah, I know; wanky) and even-handed - and I've found that a certain fun element of irresponsibility has been lost along the way.
Those who think it's all secret handshakes, Ming the Merciless moustaches and sangria in the park are welcome to give it a go... |