|
|
Some thoughts on the ethics of magickal work...
For the second time in my life, and in a remarkably timely fashion, I have been psychically scrutinised without having given consent. The first time was a girlfriend who took me to meet her medium grandmother, who told me I would have big dogs when I was older. I didn't much mind that, though I felt I'd been shanghai'd into participating in something I wasn't happy with.
This time, a rather more perceptive person - a healer I know a little - was asked by a concerned third party to check me out. I've just had the results of that check.
They're spot on, which is interesting. They're also far more about my emotional state than my physical one - although there are some interesting minor medical points which I thought were private to me and my doctor, but apparently a healer half way around the world can spot them without difficulty. Such is privacy in the global age.
Anyway, a couple of observations: first, I'm now going to have to deal with the stuff I've been told. I'm not sure I was ready to do that, but now it's right there in front of me in a distressingly accurate portrait, and my hand is forced. That may or may not be a good thing. Second, I do feel a little invaded. If I went to a dinner party and someone asked a psychologist friend to test me over pudding, I'd feel similarly peeved. I think a good barometer of magickal work is whether, if one achieved the same result by conventional means, it would be considered or require unethical behaviour.
More generally, on the matter of nudging your chances in job interviews and so on, the following notion occurs to me: that it is legitimate to influence those things which would otherwise be arbitrary.
Looking for a formula which would govern the other times - those moments when you want to cause something to happen which would require major intervention of some kind - a working to stop the war in Iraq, for example. |
|
|