|
|
I'm very interested in this. (Especially as isn't Kit-Kat doing one now? one of yours, Sax?)
Couple of simple points. Barbelith is majority male, albeit more mixed than it's probably ever been. Jenny's a open-source comic book character. There are very few(??) id'd women who post regularly in the comics forum AFAIK(admittedly i only lurk occasionally so could be missing alot)
But this doesn't explain all of it. Youse who hang around the Creation, what's the gender split like in here?
There's also the fact that certain sorts of fiction attract different constituencies. Slash, for example, is overwhelmingly female. Comics, not to the same extent as slash, are percieved as very male-dominated, and still are, though not as much as previously.
For the rest, will go away and read them all again, have a think and come back. Have a hunch that I was very conscious of her being written/drawn by men in everything i've read, but i'm not sure why and don't want to jumpt in with both feet. just this once(!)
Have a nagging feeling that it's to due with elements of 'cuteness' in most of the presentations, textual/visual, and the possible 'alterna-sexualising' involved.
but then that's a part of thinking yr characters are *great* and not neccessarily a negative thing.
But generally agree with Anna's point, that unless her gender/sex are a pivotal part of the narrative (as with yr period thing. Which I rather liked.) then Jenny as character should be the starting point/focus, and that this may involve gender/sex-influenced points, but shouldn't start from them.
Course, i'm not a proper writer, and having just struggled like hell to write some dialogue for Nelson, i appreciate that this subtlety is a pain in the arse to achieve...
This is *vague* innit? I'll come back when I've read'em again...
And certainly male writers/creatives can 'do' women. it's not all Hemingway, by any means! It's about how one approaches one's characterisation,and as anna says,being conscious of not lapsing into cliche/generalisation. |
|
|