BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Currency brokers - why not scum?

 
 
w1rebaby
19:34 / 30.01.02
Over the course of the years most of my rabid political beliefs have been tempered somewhat by increasing understanding of the situation. I don't believe that privatisation of utilities is always a bad idea any more. I can see certain cases for limiting the powers of unions. I no longer think that socialism, or anarchism, will solve the world's problems. I'm slightly more accepting of the concept of the international arms trade, for god's sake.

However, there's one thing that I've not been able to shake - the belief that currency speculators and brokers are economic parasites who do nothing for anyone apart from themselves.

This has come up again recently while I've been thinking about the euro. I really can't see any benefit in enabling people to speculate on currency exchange, and I'm overjoyed at the prospect that it will be in some small measure restrained. I recall hearing that 95% of the world's currency exchange transactions are purely for the purpose of speculation rather than, say, buying goods in other countries.

This does make me suspicious though. Can anyone give me any reasons why currency speculation and brokerage is at all defensible?
 
 
Logos
20:44 / 30.01.02
The basic reason is that currency trading makes international trade possible. Moreover, the high volume of currency traded for speculative purposes lowers the cost of international trade, by increasing the liquidity of all currencies traded. The end result is lower prices for goods, when the currency markets are in equilibrium.
 
 
w1rebaby
09:20 / 31.01.02
I'm not quite with you. I'm not talking about currency trading, rather speculation on exchange rates. I understand that currency trading is necessary when you have different currencies.

How does a high volume of currency trading decrease the cost of international trade? By decreasing the charges made for the trading of those currencies?
 
 
Logos
14:05 / 02.02.02
This is a really complex question: like everything else in monetary economics, it connects to everything else. So, here's a second try.

There are actually several ways in which trading volume may be considered "high": high in terms of a large number of active traders, high relative to other days in the same (currency) market, or high in magnitude (of trading blocks).

What is important is the first of these three. The foundation of all modern currencies is absract value, as opposed to being directly linked to some commodity, like gold. This means that the value of a unit of currency is directly linked to your ability to buy something else with it. The ease with which you do so is a property called liquidity. The fact that everybody else around you is also willing to accept the value of your money allows you to easily convert that money into whatever it is you want to trade for it.

Having a lot of trades going on in the market, and a lot of players in the market means that 1) You can make a trade at any time you want, since there's always going to be someone buying or selling at any given moment 2) the "spread" or diference between the buyer's price and seller's price is very low, and the cost (in risk and in expense) is also relatively low.
 
  
Add Your Reply