BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Capturing The Friedmans or, Fuck Hollywood

 
 
videodrome
02:30 / 01.08.03
I've been sitting on this for a while, hoping that the glut of blockbuster topics would wane. Not that I'm excusing myself - to my shame, I've been a willing participant. But I can stay silent no longer. I've wanted to shout to the world that Capturing The Friedmans is the best movie I've seen in years, and now is the time.

(Granted, OK, it doesn't seem to be out in the UK yet.)

This blows Bowling For Critical Praise to pieces. Why? Because the filmmaker, Andrew Jarecki, isn't interested in demonstrating how fabulous his point of view is, nor his cleverness. Instead, he's collected a shitload of info on a highly flammable topic, then taken a couple steps back with a quiet look on his face that says, 'Ok, what do you make of this?'

So. The topic. On Long Island in 1987, a man (Arnold Friedman) teaching computer classes for teenage boys was accused of sexually assaulting his students, assisted by his teenage son (Jesse Friedman). The director discovered this story while interviewing Jesse's brother David for a documentary about clowns in NYC. (David is perhaps the city's most successful clown.) Both Friedmans pled guilty, but the charges against them were unreasonable to say the least, and as interviews with all involved attest, everyone had an opinion before hearing the facts. The film is made more complex by the inclusion of home video shot by David while the ordeal was taking place.

There seems to be little question that something might have happened, but what, exactly? The 'justice' in this case was limp and ill-gained at best, if it was even required. Nearly every major facet of humanity is on display, in each character. Jarecki wins high praise (except from Kenneth Turan of the LA Times) for standing back and letting the story tell itself. He does have a perceptible bias, but it's not one that overwhelms your own line of questioning about these events. It's riveting, and I left my first screening with more questions than any other film has raised.

Don't be a Studio Stooge. See this. See it twice, and make your friends see it. Talk about it. Rent Rashomon, splice the two together, eat some brownies and wonder how humanity can be so wonderful when we're also such shit. Then go to bed.

(A panoply of reviews available here. That's right - a panoply.)
 
 
pomegranate
13:46 / 01.08.03
i saw this on one of the first nights it played in chicago (before that, it had only played in new york city and great neck, where it takes place). the director was there and he took questions afterwards. the first question someone asked was, "what do *you* think happened?" he said, "well, i don't want to get into that right away, let's take some other questions." when the session was wrapping up, someone said, "so what do you think happened?" and jarecki said, "well, i think that's what the film is about." i thought it was just terrific of him to let the film speak for itself and not share his opinion, and of course he must have one. i thought that showed integrity. (but then again i can't keep my mouth shut about any of my opinions most times, so i'm more impressed prob'ly.)
the director also said that there is a five hour cut of this movie that is fascinating, and he wants to put it on dvd. i'd watch it.
 
 
bjrn
21:24 / 13.09.06
I saw the film just a few weeks ago, and I found it absolutely fascinating, and I really have to see it again sometime. And if that five hour version ever reaches us unwashed masses, I'd love to see that as well.

I think it's hard to make something like this without giving off the impression of bias some way, but that's okay, because Jarecki has done a stunning job. And everyone should see this (well, perhaps not everyone, but almost everyone).

As the movie progressed, and when I finished viewing it, I really had this question gnawing away at me: If something happened, why did no one speak to the police until the police themselves went to talk to people? Could something like that go unnoticed by parents?
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
20:46 / 15.09.06
Thanks for bumping this- I've been wanting to see this film for ages, but couldn't remember what it was called.
 
  
Add Your Reply