|
|
I think it is important, because it changes the nature of the statement.
As quoted in the thread opener, Lull's statement is difficult to defend. Kooky points out that Herriman and Archie contributed to the developement of the indies, to which I'll add Mad, the work of Bill Gaines and indeed the whole EC banner, western comics, romance comics and all of the other then-mainstream, non-superhero genres that did perfectly well, thank you very much, on the Hey Kids! rack up to the '70s. Unless I'm way off the mark, France has done quite well with little to no superhero work. Ever been to a comic shop in France? Huge rows of beautiful hardcover books, browsed by more classes and cultures than you'll ever see in an American shop (at least). Without those books our indies may not be around. SH books, then, play only a part in the history of indies, which would, based on the French Connection, probably still be here without them.
But in context, Lull's point is an entirely different one, which is that as the market currently stands, SH books do duty not only as the crutch, but also the blood pressure medication, colostomy bag and aspirin for the industry. This, sadly, is an arguable point. We can go round this one all week, and it's not the point of the thread.
But yer, I agree with KM that pointing out the original quote is at the very least polite - while jumping off from the quoted line is perfectly reasonable, presenting it as a whole statement is less so, because it, erm, isn't. |
|
|