This has all been very helpful so far. I wonder if participation in and of itself would be sufficient in terms of 'powering' the hypersigil - in which case by merely reading the Invivibles collection you are contributing towards the hypersigil.
And if a hypersigil is dynamic, how much of the initial intention of the hypersigil itself would be reflected in the 'end product', in a sense? I suppose 'end product' is a poorly chosen term. Using the Invisibles as an example, a narrative hypersigil, the initial intentions were to change the writer's (Grant's) life, and meet like-minded people(I'm sure there's more to it than that, but for the sake of argument- ), then the 'end product' that we see here are, aside from the aforementioned two, the hordes of readers and readers-to-be, webpages like Barbelith that continue to grow despite the series completion, etc, and more results that have grown well beyond its initial intention. That about right?
In that case, hmmm, how do you manage something as dynamic as that? In terms of predicting (I hesitate to use the word controlling) outcome? |