BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Media for recording your life

 
 
waxy dan
08:51 / 19.06.03
What's your favourite kind've recording medium? What freezes the moment with the most clarity and truth for you?

I like SLR cameras, that are mostly manual and go "ker-CHUNK" when the you take a shot. They feel real. I have a Nikormat that's older than me, solid metal, and heavy enough to kill a man with a single blow to the head. The quality of the recording image is very high, which helps maintain that moment in time. But, in many ways, the weight and feel of the camera itself is what sparks off the memories for me. If I'm leafing through old photographs, I like to have the SLR there beside me.

I have a fairly new digital camera as well. Which is all funky because it's immmediate and has that ephemeral never-real-to-begin-with quality. I find that most of my recent shots are on digital, though this is more due to its ease than anything else. The camera itself holds less nostaliga for me, and it won't, no matter how long I have it. The electronics will always seem replaceable, something that the largely mechanical apparatus of the SLR for some reason don't. However, the sheer volume of shots that I can take with the digital means that I capture moments that the SLR would not allow me to.

Though often for true memory-jerkers, polaroid is da Boy! It's as near to the event as one can get. The actual light caught right there on that piece of paper. Not filtered by enlargers or printers. Polaroid rocks. Holding one in my hand I almost feel like I'm reliving the event. The print seeming strangely fragile and precious, due to it's unique quality.
But the actualy quality of the shot does detract from it somewhat. It never captures light just right, or the texture of someone's skin or eyes.

Then again, my most treasured piece of audio was recorded at my 25th birthday party (one of the best weekends of me life!) on a gag gift. One of those 'record 30 secs of audio' gadget watches. The quality is appaling, but I've never recorded over it. It's just 30 secs of noise in a restaraunt, where I can make out the voices of various friends shouting and laughing. The audio adds a whole new layer to the memory, and it's a little fragment of time I'd like to still be listening to when I'm wrinkly and hanging around my retirement ranch, whittling sticks and bursting any footballs that come over my fence.

Which brings me back to the digital camera, it can record video. Which is something I rarely keep, but it captures such life and tone (audio and video). Often people come to life in their movements in a way that a static image can never capture.

On the far side of the technological valley, my pencil drawings often bring back moments with a still, quiet, and surprisingly clarity.

... But by this stage I'm rambling, so I'll wrap up, what type of recording medium works for you? Why? How much does the technology interfere with/enhance/alter the memory for you?
 
 
Kit-Cat Club
09:38 / 19.06.03
Oh, I was so sure this was going to be about musical instruments! I was going to say, all right-thinking people prefer the treble recorder...
 
 
waxy dan
09:41 / 19.06.03
Hrmm.. good point, okay give me "two moderators later" and I'll switch that about.
 
 
rizla mission
13:49 / 19.06.03
Audio cassette. It's the only way.
 
 
w1rebaby
14:08 / 19.06.03
Not just Polaroid, but Polaroid i-Zone. It's not brick-sized, so you can actually take it places! You can stick the pictures onto letters and postcards and your forehead! They are cutely small, but surprisingly decent actually if you scan them and enlarge! The film is extremely expensive but comes in small packages so you don't notice so much!
 
 
Ariadne
14:15 / 19.06.03
I don't record my life, I live it!

That sounds a bit annoying, I know, but I really never remember to take pictures of things. I do own a low-res digital camera but most of the time I forget to take it with me - and it's usually for silly moments that I'll email round whoever was involved and then, mostly, delete.

I try on and off to keep a diary but usually give up when I slip into moaning-adolescent mode.

I don't tape or video anything either.

Writing this is making me worry, though -- will I regret the lack of evidence of my life when I'm older? Gulp.
 
 
Hattie's Kitchen
14:39 / 19.06.03
I have an SLR camera, a digital still and video camera and a Hi8 video camera...the digital camera is like a matchbox, you can stick it in your pocket and take it anywhere, and the res is excellent - it's good for those impromptu opportunistic photos when you're out and about...the SLR I use mainly for portraits/landscape shit, mostly black and white stuff, and the Hi8 camera I got about 7 years ago, when I was larking about at a TV project I was involved in...I feel guilty for having all this gadgetry and not using them as much as I should...what I really, really want is a Steadicam...oh the bliss...
 
 
waxy dan
14:40 / 19.06.03
Rizla Why cassette? Doesn't the constant crackling noise and the slow degrading of quality over time detract from its appeal a bit?

Ariadne and Fridge You're both talking about essentially disposale media, right?

...

I lost my APS camera for a while last year, and I didn't think too much of it at the time. But I now find this huge gap in 'record'. Faces I can't quite remember, places I can't quite recall.

Then again I'm fiercely sentimental... if one can be fierce about sentiment... Maybe most people either a) have better memories than sieve-boy here, or b) simply don't mind quite so much?

Or recording it all binds you too tightly?

Or am I giving this far too much thought?
 
 
Ariadne
14:52 / 19.06.03
It's more that recording the moment stops me from *being* there somehow. You have to step back and create an artificial moment that you then photograph, no?
 
 
waxy dan
14:54 / 19.06.03
You mean that you have to arrange the shot in a posed and 'artificial' manner?

Or that the recording will always be essentially different from the moment itself in the way it's 'framed'?

Or that in being the recorder, you're not part of the experience?
 
 
Ninjas make great pets
14:54 / 19.06.03
I have a dodgy memory at the best of times so recording things by whatever means is quite important to me.
I have to agree though, Photos, audio, video, it never does the moment justice.
One thing Ive found is a stunning recording device is high emotion. I can relive moments of anger or fear or elation with astonishing clarity. Not the best recording method but an amazingly lasting one!
 
 
Ariadne
15:01 / 19.06.03
The last two rather than the first, waxy dan. You have to step out of the situation to record it. Mostly, its because I forget, but even when i do remember I'm loath to stop what's happening and take a picture.
 
 
Mourne Kransky
16:50 / 19.06.03
I'm in the Ariadne camp here. I usually remember to take a camera on holiday but forget to take any pictures. When I do, it takes me forever to get them developed and I have a happy time looking through them, once, then stick them in a drawer. There are a few that pass muster and may be framed around the house but they're not usually portraits, more likely an interesting doorframe or a bit of sculpture.

I have some video film of my grandparents (long deceased) at a wedding in the early sixties (transferred from dodgy old cine film) and some film of my sister's wedding twelve or thirteen years ago. The pleasure is less in seeing the younger me with badly dressed and coiffed friends than in just knowing I could pop them in the machine and see people living and breathing who are no longer around. So, I'd plump for videofilm as my recorder of choice. Not that I do watch any of the films I have more than once in five years or so.

Ganesh's gadget-happy brother in law offered us his superduper videocam to take to India with us last time we went and we both instantly refused. He was mystified but, for us, the idea of devoting time to making the record and taking care of an expensive piece of electronics seemed burdensome, when we just wanted to maximise the experience.

The audio component is always alarming. I can't bear the sound of my own voice minus bone conduction. I hear Lee Marvin but the world hears Dame Edna with a Scots burr. It's not right.
 
 
w1rebaby
21:51 / 19.06.03
You're both talking about essentially disposale media, right?

Partly. Polaroids do last, and can be scanned etc, but I'm generally more interested in the immediate or short-term aspects of recording things. I take a lot of digital photos, but mostly in case one of them turns out to be something particularly beautiful. The i-Zone things can be used instantly. For instance, when going to a wedding once, I only took an i-Zone camera. Not only was I able to create ID badges saying "OFFICIAL USHER", I also took photos of us holding a present and stuck it in the wedding book thing, and took a photo of my arse in the toilets and stick it to my forehead. And other people took pictures of me. That's what I call a camera.

I like to have at least one decent photo of people who've been important in my life, and I sometimes enjoy looking back through old pictures, but I'm more interested in recording things and using them, rather than for long-term nostalgia.
 
 
waxy dan
07:49 / 20.06.03
Xoc: I know. Maybe there should be a "do you hate the sound of your own voice" thread as well, where everyone can post .wav files instead of photos.

Fridge That's what I meant by disposable. I wasn't verbalising it very well. That is a lot of fun, it's true. I often use my digital camera in a similar way. The screen allows things to be viewed instantly, creating a good conversation filler, and occasional ice-breaker.
...

I find myself sometimes quite enjoying the distance using a camera can create between myself and the subjects. By that I don't mean being bloody irritating and pointing a lens in everyone's faces, but making myself a quiet observer looking from the outside in is, I find, an interesting and calming experience. If a tad cowardly/arrogant at times.

I'd agree that relying on recording the experience, rather than.. well... experiencing it, certainly detracts from it. I can never understand the tourists we often see who wander around the city, camera omnipresent, experiencing everything through a lens. Maybe that says a great deal about our media culture at present, I'm not sure.

Outside of recording the 'big' things; the holidays and weddings, the momentous events: I was talking about this with a friend last night. She mentioned her cousin who, since the age of 12, has shot one roll of 35mm each month. At the time, he shots things that he finds quite mundane and boring. But, looking back over them, he has these media items he cherishes. Seemingly trivial mometns of his mother doing the dishes, or the house where he used to live, have become hugely important to him.
 
 
The Return Of Rothkoid
12:28 / 20.06.03
I'm a snapshot from a Holga: light-leaked and dreamy.
 
 
rizla mission
13:41 / 20.06.03
Rizla Why cassette? Doesn't the constant crackling noise and the slow degrading of quality over time detract from its appeal a bit?

um.. nope. makes it better in fact.

Polaroid camera also. Not that I've ever owned one, but I've always wanted one. Failing that, I really cheap disposable camera.
 
 
rizla mission
13:43 / 20.06.03
Rizla Why cassette? Doesn't the constant crackling noise and the slow degrading of quality over time detract from its appeal a bit?

um.. nope. makes it better in fact.

Polaroid camera also. Not that I've ever owned one, but I've always wanted one. Failing that, a really cheap disposable camera.
 
 
waxy dan
13:54 / 20.06.03
a really cheap disposable camera.
What, like a Holga?

um.. nope. makes it better in fact
I'd agree with you in many ways but, out of curiousity, why?
 
  
Add Your Reply