BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


TV and 24

 
 
grim reader
19:56 / 08.06.03
Another interesting discussion going on between me and my friends re: TV and 24 is here (follow the 'marmots' link to get to the real meat of the discussion; sorry I can't post directly).
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
21:31 / 08.06.03
Is it spam? It feels like Spam...

CBR, so far you have linked to your blog in pretty much every thread you have touched. Could you possibly do us the courtesy of telling us a bit about how you and your chums feel here, so we can talk about it here, rather than clicking on marmots?

Also, there is already a 24 thread, of course.

Anyone mind if I move to have this thread deleted?
 
 
grim reader
21:58 / 08.06.03
I didn't realise that there was a problem with linking to my blog and the blogs of others. Why bother repeating stuff thats already been posted elsewhere which is easily accessible via a link? It seems like a lot of hard work to reprint stuff. And if it is any consolation, I link to barbelith as much as i link to my own and others' blogs (i've got permanent links to several threads on my blog, plus a link to the main underground site). I'm interested in getting barbelites talking to my mates in meatspace and vice versa, because I think they're both interesting sets of people. I'm trying to facilitate an interesting flow of information and discussion. Delete this thread if you want, but i think it'd be a shame. Why get so worked up about virtual space? It should be here to make things easier.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
09:51 / 09.06.03
Well, you are basically saying "Don't discuss this on Barbelith - look at my blog and my mate's blogs instead" here. That's not contributing much to Barbelith. It's generally good practice to include an excerpt from the thing you are linking to, for example a review or a news story, to show what sort of thing it is, if it is worksafe and other impedimenta.

Why not just invite your chums onto Barbelith? Runce, for example, appears to have imported his entire social circle wholesale onto the board and they're having a lovely picnic. YOu know, with a comment like Hey nick, i was thinking why not start this 24 discussion on Berbelith? It needs a few good discussions going, as most are pretty crappy.

The "interesting discussion", for those as are minded, goes something like this:

I will state now, and again - I do not think recent 24 has good television. I may stop watching it, because I am not enjoying it, its too close to the nerve with all the torture, sanctioning of evil and so on - some of the scenes that have had anyone of the Islamic faith in them have been particularly difficult to watch, just because it worries me what the people who made it were thinking, and what the average American we get told about will be thinking while watching. If anyone wants to discuss it with me, or even continue where we left off, I would be happy to do it here on the blog. Andrew, I can't quite remember what you were telling me, but a lot of it I didn't entirely agree with, and really can't be expected to talk seriously about these things on the spot like that, but I'd be happy if you raised some of your points again on the blog.


The 24 thread is here. It looks like we all lost interest in it about the time Jack shaved his legs to demonstrate just how back on-mission he was.
 
 
grim reader
10:14 / 09.06.03
Thanks for the reply, Haus, and thanks for also importing some text from the thread I linked to. When you looked at the off-barbelith threads, you must have seen my posts encouraging the discussion to move onto barbelith, as I don't think 'marmots' are a particularly good format of discussion (although the html has since been editted to make them easier to read/write). So I wasn't really basically saying "Don't discuss this on Barbelith - look at my blog and my mate's blogs instead", but in fact the reverse (although we do like new people visiting blogs, i for one am still incredibly narcissistic). I think if there's a decent discussion board like Barbelith, it is much more preferable to use it than to use the reply funtion on blogs. Apologies for any misunderstandings. And since you've shown you're reasonable (i came online prepared to rant and rave at your 'is it spam?' post after having not slept all night, and that was one of the things festering in my brain ), I'll cut and paste some of the interesting stuff re:TV now i have the time, just to make sure this post isn't entirely off topic (hope we're not scaring anybody off the actual juicy bits of the discussion).

mannin: I wish people would stop all this tv bashing, there are bad programmes on there but thats no reason to discredit it. You just have to know that your watching a show that was commisioned or written for a reason, potentially political. Its a fiction based on what people think and probably not what they know. R4 I think only does its weirder shows well, I learnt about the difficulties of farming sheep on seaweed. The plays have gone mostly ass but when hasnt there been too many stories about blossoming love (its what old ladies live to read/hear about), the rest of R4 is the political shows and children bickering.

My reply: The TV bashing isn't about to stop anytime soon, Manning. I wish people would stop trying to defend it! Real people are more important than TV, and yet their arguments get discredited and ignored because that thing seizes a monopoly on expression. The television bashing will stop when the TV reduces its effect on my life to nil, or at least affects me only on my own terms. TV has infested every corner of life, and is constantly pushing offensive ideology onto us (like that idea of 'balance' you brought up in a previous post), whether one ever goes near a TV set or not.

D&J atplay Ronan is quite right. TV is the most socially damaging & controling piece of technology that we have yet to come up with. MacCluhan in the '60s stated that the medium was both message & massage. As soon as the media magnates realised people were onto them, the whole mega tyranny became even more subtle. Where I disagree with Ronan is that he would throw the baby out with the bath water. He probably reckons there is no baby in there, I think there is but it is very small! In the 50's TV united families and people in a very democratic way. Most people couldn't afford, or felt too socially inept, to go and watch plays. Miillions however watched the mid-week play, or Hancocks half hour, and talked about the issues raised at work or school the next day. There was only 12 hours screened a day, split between two channels. One such play "Cathy Come Home", was a huge step in the creation of the homeless charity "Shelter". What the present generation must watch out for & guard against, are changes to the inherent democracy of the internet. Hackers are already treated as being terrorists. Who owns cyberspace? The world G8 governments certainly don't want it to be you.

The T: Previous experience should tell me to decline to post the entirety of my pro-24 case on here. But I will say the following in agreeance with mr manuel and owl: TV is fiction, just like anything else be they plays, books, movies, comics, animations, etc... Just because the Tv is easier to get to and more absorbing than some of the others does not necessarily make it bad. Nor does the fact that it has low-brow entertainment not containing any platty pretensions of art or serious issues. If you don't like Tv you don't have to watch it.

Hope this piques the interest of a few of you. Happy chattin'!
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
10:45 / 09.06.03
Well, it strikes me that we're not really talking about 24 here, except tangentially. Working from those extracts, it sounds like the main defendant here is TV in general, which is being accused of...well, what, exactly?

It serves as a conduit for propaganda, I guess, since 24 was being criticised for its tolerance of evil acts and perceived Islam-bashing (Moslem-bashing?). Most commercially available television is produced or commissioned by a small number of monolithically wealthy companies that might be advancing their own agenda - Fox is an obvious example, being subject to the whims of one highly politicised man. And it mioght discourage people from more "edifiying" pursuits such as reading, political campaigning, voluntary work...

How am I doing? And are these evils specific to TV or to all readily available "cool" media (is TV a cool medium? Hang on - where's my copy of Understanding Media...anyone?)? Conversely, what's *good* about TV? Previously on Barbelith somebody argued for reality TV as a sign of a culture in decadence, as opposed to the socially conscious ST:TNG, for example...
 
 
The_T
23:49 / 29.07.03
If anyone stumbles acroos this in the fututre, I'm andrew. Lol @ Haus Re TNG.
 
  
Add Your Reply