|
|
Whisky wrote: Not nearly dull and nonsensical enough to be a true parody of the original.
Soooo... how close does the parody have to be to satirise the original? Is that a valid criticism (not just of my Matrix II parody, but as a complaint against any parody?)
I would have thought that as long as you captured the essence you wanted, it didn't matter where you went from there. In other words, if it's clear what you're mocking, does it matter if the mockery is more intelligent than the original - in fact, isn't that the point? |
|
|