BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Multiple ficsuits for magickal metacommentary - is this allowed?

 
 
penitentvandal
15:29 / 18.05.03
As part of my current Comic Book Magic experiment, I'm planning on sticking a false thread in the Magick forum, which takes the form of a discussion of the last two 'issues'(months) of the imaginary, Morrison-written comic I'm currently imagining my life as. To do this I intend to create one or two fake fiction suits who will function as critics, theorybitching about the storyline and summing up the events for the benefit of real people on the board (who will also be able to comment, if they so wish).

The intention behind this fake thread is not so much to wankle on about how weird my life's been since starting the experiment (though obviously that will come up), but rather to add extra strength to the invocation, by creating a level of reality on which the imaginary comic becomes slightly more real.

In terms of ethics: the fake ficsuits will do nothing more than comment in the imaginary comic thread. It will be made absolutely clear that they only exist conceptually, and are not to be taken as real people. This will be noted in their profiles.

Any individuals not in the public domain will be identified by aliases, which will have no connection to their real names (i.e. someone called John will not simply have their name changed to James or Jonathan, but something totally unconnected, like Philip). Figures in the public domain (i.e. poets I've done gigs or projects with, and am therefore on record as being associated with) will have their real names used, BUT! nothing will be revealed about them which violates their privacy. Any magickal entities encountered during the process will be named, as they will be taken to exist in the public domain.

I think these arrangements will allow me to go about doing this in an ethically watertight manner, but if there's anything anyone can point out which makes this rather a bad idea, such as this being against board policy, please point it out below. I'm extremely motivated to ensure that this experiment stays within carefully regulated parameters.
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
11:55 / 19.05.03
Tell you what we told Knodge. You can do it if you must, but if you used it to insult or argue with other posters then it'll be deleted. Might be an idea if you let the Magic mods know the names of your alter-egos.
 
 
Tom Coates
14:37 / 19.05.03
Yeah I think that's fair - multiple user names are very much not sanctioned as a rule. If you express a purpose for them, state clearly that they're your multiples and they don't start acting up and misbehaving then I doubt anyone'll complain...
 
 
cusm
15:12 / 26.05.03
If this is just for one thread, keep the use of the suits to just that thread, and post an explaination in the abstract of what you are doing. That way the paramaters of the working are set. As long as it doesn't leak to other parts of the board, you should be covered as this is a magick thing and not a board thing. As well for a general rule, threads that are a part of a personal working should be noted as such in the abstract so people are aware before taking part in them. Its just polite.

Aah, the fun we have in The Magick sometimes
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
12:25 / 30.05.03
Well, it's up and going and you seem to be having great fun with this, but someone who doesn't understand these things, can you explain what value you're getting out of it? At the moment, yes it's very funny but it looks like something that should be in the Conversation with the other 'fluff'...
 
 
Less searchable M0rd4nt
15:46 / 30.05.03
I've been following the thread in question fairly closely, for obvious reasons. It might be fairly fluffy, but IMHO it still constitutes a magickal working and so belongs in Magickville.

Spurious prediction threads, on the other hand...
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
19:01 / 30.05.03
Yeah, that came out a lot sharper than I intended, just wanted vv to let us know how he felt it was going...
 
  
Add Your Reply