|
|
Yes, Kali. "Nanny-state" is another way to denigrate and dismiss views that are not yours without actually addressing them. However, you did not provide an "opinion". You gave an instruction.
If one has a problem with the ideas being expressed in a thread that one finds offensive by another poster, please PM that individual about your concerns.
You then made it clear that if anyone took issue with this, it would be a sign of ugliness and "mob mentality", and now apparently of a nanny state.
I have no issues with you. I have issues with bad argumentation and attempts to shut down discussion. "Issues", incidentally? Another term designed to question the validity of any opposing viewpoint without actually engaging with it.
Now, if you would like to discuss how people should be allowed to respond to speech that is making them uncomfortable, that is if you would like to police their speech, that's fine. It's probably best to open a Policy thread.
If you were merely stating your purely personal opinion and preference, then that's also fine, but next time please try to do so without insulting and dismissing anyone who might feel or behave differently, because this preemptive dismissal is also an attempt to police their speech.
If you feel that you will not be able to do either of these things without inadvertently using terms likely to insult and belittle, then feel free to PM me, and we can iron out your form of words. |
|
|