|
|
hmph, not sure about the cries of sexism, myself. The night, as I understand it, wasn't about a notion that men should be kept indoors while the women could carouse into the small hours...
but was to highlight the problems of domestic violence and street crime and the extent to which a city could become a dangerous space to women, primarily because of crimes committed against them by men (off to check facts on this, if i'm wrong please let me know) and was a temporary strategy to achive this... far better imho than an adveritising campaign, for example...
so why sexist?
I also really like the general idea of changing the makeup of a city for a day, which in this case seems to have led to a greater awareness of the 'normal' conditions of the city being affectable, changeable, rather than givens... remaking a city for 24 hours as a demonstration of the potential for change. In a weird way, transforming a whole city into a woman-friendly ghetto, or taking the idea of woman-friendly/safe and secure spaces out of the 'ghetto' and making it citywide...
The notion of being able to walk around a big city late at night, relatively sure of avoiding sexual harassment (from annoying but typical 'leery man' syndrome right the way to serious sexual assualt) really strikes a chord with alot of women i've talked to about this.
and why stop with sexual/gender curfews? |
|
|