BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Media monopoly?

 
 
grant
15:15 / 02.05.03
The latest MoveOn newsletter focuses on the media.

Especially new FCC rulings that work against local ownership.

Quote: On June 2, the Federal Communications Commission, run by Michael Powell (son of Colin), plans to end long-standing federal checks and balances on corporate media power.


Companies behind the measure include the powerhouses of corporate media power: Rupert Murdoch's News Corp/Fox., General Electric/NBC, Viacom/CBS, Disney/ABC, Tribune Corp and Clear Channel. Once the rules are swept away, expect to see more mergers and buy-outs of radio and TV stations, major papers and even TV networks. It will then soon be possible for a single conglomerate to control most of a community's major media outlets, including cable systems and broadband Internet service providers. There will be fewer owners nationally of all major media outlets of communications.


and...

The FCC's Powell is also promoting massive consolidation in cable TV and with online communications for this summer. Soon just two massive cable companies – Comcast and AOL Time Warner – may be legally permitted to own almost all of the nation's cable TV systems. And Powell has already removed critical safeguards that will enable cable and telephone giants to dominate high-speed Internet access – which has alarmed the ACLU (and even other monopolists like Microsoft and Disney).



Oooo! The ACLU is worried!


Well, so is Barry Diller, the founder of Fox Network and current CEO of the conglomerate that owns Home Shopping Network and Ticketmaster:

Thirty years ago, three companies controlled 90 percent of everything we heard or saw. And that was a bad idea. Now four companies, five companies control 90 percent of everything we see.

...There should be some restraints. Broadcasting really used to have a very clear public service quotient and it's been lost. Other things have been lost too. This perfect balance which was created by fear (is gone). Fear that your license would get taken away from you plus a real sense of public service responsibility. That those airwaves actually belonged to the public. You used them. You profited from them. But you had to keep it in balance. That was a healthy environment. And in that environment, of course, mistakes get made, excesses happen. But they rebalance themselves.

Today, after Mark Fowler says...

(The Chairman of FCC in the Reagan Era. )

Who says, you know, a television is a toaster. It's just there for marketing. All that goes away.
 
 
grant
15:22 / 02.05.03
So... why does it matter who provides the crap we see on the tube?


Well, here's one story:

At 1:30 on a cold January night, a train containing hundreds of thousands of gallons of toxic ammonia derails in Minot, North Dakota. Town officials try to sound the emergency alert system, but it isn't working. Desperate to warn townspeople about the poisonous white cloud bearing down on them, the officials call their local radio stations. But no one answers any of the phones for an hour and a half. According to the New York Times, three hundred people are hospitalized, some are partially blinded, and pets and livestock are killed.

Where were Minot's DJs on January 18th, 2002? Where was the late night station crew? As it turns out, six of the seven local radio stations had recently been purchased by Clear Channel Communications, a radio giant with over 1,200 stations nationwide. Economies of scale dictated that most of the local staff be cut: Minot stations ran more or less on auto pilot, the programming largely dictated from further up the Clear Channel food chain. No one answered the phone because hardly anyone worked at the stations any more; the songs played in Minot were the same as those played on Clear Channel stations across the Midwest.


Emergencies happen, right?

Well, what if it wasn't the radio station, but the local news. Local news is local, right?

Nope.

Meet the Sinclair News Group:

Today, Sinclair touts itself as "the nation's largest commercial television broadcasting company not owned by a network." You've probably never heard of them because the 62 stations they run – garnering 24 percent of the national TV audience – fly the flags of the networks they broadcast: ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, and the WB.

...According to Sinclair's website, NewsCentral is a "revolutionary news model" that introduces "local news in programming in markets that otherwise could not support news." Begun in 2002, it's being tested in five not-so-small markets: Minneapolis, Flint (MI), Oklahoma City (OK), Raleigh (NC), and Rochester (NY). (Hyman's segment, "The Point," however, is aired on all 62 of its stations.) In these five cities, the hour-long newscast combines local broadcasting with prepackaged news. To maintain the appearance of local news, the Baltimore on-air staff is coached on the intricacies of correct local pronunciations. Or the weatherman, safely removed from the thunderstorms in, say, Minneapolis, will often engage in scripted banter with the local anchor to maintain the pretense: "Should I bring an umbrella tomorrow, Don?" "You bet, Hal, it looks pretty ugly out there..."


And of course, the fun part for y'all identifying as left of center:

In the program's concluding segment, "The Point," Mark Hyman rants against peace activists ("wack-jobs"), the French ("cheese-eating surrender monkeys"), progressives ("loony left") and the so-called liberal media, usually referred to as the "hate-America crowd" or the "Axis of Drivel." Colorful, if creatively anemic, this is TV's version of talk radio, with the precisely tanned Hyman playing a second-string Limbaugh.

Although "The Point" appears on every one of Sinclair's 62 widespread stations as part of the local news shows, it's written, filmed and produced in their headquarters in Baltimore.

Is this model the future of American broadcasting?
 
 
Salamander
07:31 / 03.05.03
Anyone that used to compare America to Rome can now start comparing Amarica to Germany, circa 1939. I could rant, but I won't.
 
 
grant
15:05 / 05.05.03
Actually, the scarier comparison would be to Rwanda's "hate radio" that played a key role in the genocide there.

I don't think this is quite at that level - like, I doubt Hyman is actually saying "OK, there's a bunch of leftists at 16th street in Cleveland. You know where to bring the molotovs now." But still, there's a coercive power to broadcast media that can't be ignored.

And when it becomes undemocratic, it's a little scary.
 
  
Add Your Reply