|
|
Yup. Well, he proposed cuts to the VA in his budget, which is still being wrangled...
"The Republican budget cuts each category of veterans programs provided through the Department of Veterans Affairs - mandatory benefits and discretionary funds for health care - by a total of $15 billion over the next ten years, compared with the levels needed to maintain current law benefits and current levels of purchasing power for health care."
Not sure what that means—has the actual dollar amount been cut, or is it simply staying static, instead of growing to keep pace with inflation?
In any case, predictions are dire:
"[The Republican] budget will impose across-the-board cuts of 3.8 percent in mandatory spending on entitlements such as compensation for service-connected disabilities, burial benefits, means-tested pensions for permanently disabled low-income veterans, and education benefits like the Montgomery GI Bill. These benefits comprise 93 percent of the funding for programs under the jurisdiction of the Veterans’ Affairs (VA) Committee. For many veterans, this could mean eliminating burial benefits and reducing the cost of living allowance (COLA) increases in compensation payments with service-connected disabilities for the next six to ten years.
"This could mean 168,000 fewer veterans with health benefits, 400,000 fewer hospital bed days of care for veterans, or 8,700 fewer nurses in VA hospitals. These cuts would arrive right at the same time that most analysts predict our aging veterans will become even more dependent upon our nation’s veterans health care programs."
There are certain scare tactics being deployed in this press release—the cuts are to mandatory spending, which may not effect actual spending (though odds are it will), and there are lots of "could"s in there. But even if this spin is making it look like a bigger cut than it actually is, it's still substantial. |
|
|