MJ-12 is right. Stern might not be left-wing populist radio (like Air America tries to be) but he's populist radio that's not exactly right-wing, either.
Moore, whether you agree with him or not, is an ideologue first and an entertainer second. The entertainment stems from the ideology. Stern's an entertainer, and a hedonistic one at that. Not terribly ideological, except a staunch believer in his own freedom to look at topless women while on the air.
----
On China: historically, they kind of invented isolationism. Any war with China is not going to be the kind of war we're used to. Internally, they have major problems with poverty and the environment and will, as of next year (so I've heard) not be able to grow enough food to feed their own HUGE population. So they're not going to be picking fights with food-growing nations, like the US.
One thing that I *can* see happening is, if Bush is re-elected and things go further awry in Iraq, China deciding to invade Taiwan, which they still consider part of China. Kinda like Tibet. Officially, it's home to the government-in-exile (and as such, is listed *after* Zimbabwe in the CIA Factbook, with a big asterix next to the entry). It would require relatively little troop strength on their behalf, it could be compared (however fallaciously) with the repatriation of Hong Kong & Macau. And it might or might *not* piss off the US.
A US at war elsewhere, suffering a lame economy (thus needing to stir up profits by, say, selling excess grain to somebody), wouldn't really be in a position to defend their erstwhile allies on that tiny little island. Especially since Taiwan can't represent the manufacturing powerhouse it once was when compared to Shenzhen and other "new China" mainland cities.
The main question is how much face Bush would lose by not striking decisively against a China that invaded a trading partner, I think.
It could happen. |