BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Equilibrium (spoilers)

 
 
The Strobe
09:21 / 31.03.03
I recently saw Equilibrium, in an effort to find something dumb and stupid to go and see, and I was pleasantly surprised simply because, well, it was surprisingly good, and certainly not that dumb or stupid. Reflect mentioned this in the Matrix thread, so I thought a thread was justified - even though it begins with a characteristically huge post of mine.

The plot is derivative in the extreme from classic dystopian fiction - a world where emotion is banned, controlled by a drug called "Prozium II" (ugh) which supresses emotion, thus keeping the world in an anodyne yet safe state. All art is, of course, banned, and is destroyed by containment units. The references are obvious - Huxley (T-shaped windows, fascistic overtones), Orwell ("Father", a Big-Brother-like figure, fascistic overtones) and Bradbury (book-burning, emotion and art as bad, fascistic overtones), but it does never set out to state it's doing anything different.

Into all this come the ultimate line of enforcement against "Sense Offenders" (for which you can read Thought Criminals throughout) - the Clerics. Who maintain the decency of the world with nothing but big black fascistic outfits and a pair of foot-long handguns. As you do.

One Cleric, John Preston - the best of them all, in fact - suddenly finds his belief challenged when he accidentally comes off Prozium briefly and realises the wonder in the world he's missing out on, so he sets out (after a bit of internal debate) to take the system on.

There's a fair amount to recommend Equilibrium - it had a relatively small budget ($20m - low for a film of this type) and yet pulls off some genuinely stylish moments; the production design is great, especially the marvellous overhead shot of the identical desks of the Clerics, and the concrete, angular lines of Preston's apartment. Similarly, the costume design is simple but effective.

Christian Bale, though, as Preston, is what really makes the picture tick - he lifts every scene from would could have been mediocrity in the hands of a lesser actor and actually gives them some point. There's a great scene where, investigating a hidden room decorated in the manner of the mid-20thc, he accidentally turns a gramophone on - but it's only many seconds later that the record begins playing, and when Beethoven's 9th hits him, you feel that he is genuinely overcome and not just trying to demonstrate some kind of feeling. Also mentioned in dispatches - Taye Diggs is Not Shit. His part isn't much cop, but I felt he worked relatively well, especially in the scene where he throws Preston to the ground, captive, in front of the public. (You might recognise him as the bandleader from Chicago).

What really made it work for me, in fact, were the interesting and un-mainstream choices Kurt Wimmer made in his direction and script. He kills off the female lead, for starters - I thought she was going to be saved, last-minute style, because I'm cynical. The fact she dies is great, because it gives the plot necessary emotional oomph and gives Preston a real reason to Kick Butt, not just an excuse. Similarly, Preston's discovery of the new-way-of-life doesn't happen because of the incredible power of a good woman, but simply beacuse he drops an ampoule one day. The set-up of the scenario worked well, too - a brief opening narration from Father, but then his public broadcasts punctuate the film in the background, so you don't waste time learning about the nuances of this dystopia, it just filters in through the background.

Also, as a note, it does have some great action sequences in. The first gunfight in the film takes place in pitch darkness, and is only illuminated by muzzle-flash; whilst Wimmer uses the same few shots over and over again, stylistically, this is very impressive - it really does look good without having to be expensive or OTT. That's generally the flavour of the rest of them - the Cleric's gun-katas are really just designed to look impressive, even if they're a bit unrealistic, and it certainly leads to some stylish action sequences that clearly didn't cost the earth.

In the end, Equilibrium is not going to make a lot of difference to the cinematic pantheon, but it's far better than a film starring both Sean Bean (as himself, as ever) and Sean Pertwee (as Father, chrissake - Sean Pertwee as Big Brother? Whatever next?) has any right to be. It's stylish, slick, Bale's fantastic, and it has enough interesting plot elements to lift it above other things. And, no matter what anyone says, it's not a Matrix-derivative, even if it has similar styling; it's a different kind of philosophy that's approached, and in a far more intelligent way. Wimmer's a good writer, but I think this shows he might become a good director, too.
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
12:32 / 31.03.03
Interesting, because I'd always believed Christian Bale to be incapable of acting any emotion beyond complete detachment. Might look this up now.
 
 
The Strobe
13:04 / 31.03.03
Well, essentially, all he has to emote for most of the time here is complete detachment. But he does manage to break it effectively, occasionally.

The film also has some really creepy kids in it, incidentally.
 
 
Seth
16:15 / 31.03.03
I disagree. Bale's detachment gradually slips away throughout the film. There are definite landmark scenes in which he loses his composure altogether (which are brilliantly handled), but he adds so many fine shades to his performance, it would be unfair to say it's all icy remoteness.

One of my favourite performances so far this year. Bale lifts the entire movie on his back, tying everything together. It's not a great film, don't expect too much. But Paleface is right: it's far better than it has any right to be. And the idea of accusing a movie of ripping off the Matrix is just bizarre, as that film is one of the most derivative I've ever seen. At least Equilibrium makes no pretense to being anything other than the sum of its influences.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
08:39 / 18.11.03
Saw this at the weekend and have to agree that it's great. I think the reason it works is that the concept, with all its discontinuities and cliches, never tries to be much more than an excuse for the visual style, and the visual style is incredible. Not just the fights (but God, the moment when Bale pops weird little studs out of the butts of his handguns and starts beating a circle of riot police to death, holding the guns by their barrels, obviously - so brilliant in its absurdity) but things like the representation of Libria as a sort of Ikea-tastic nightmare of minimalist good taste, with the Nethers' very British, run-down dystopian mess, so cluttered with the debris of the past, actually having a lot more humanity and warmth.

There's at least one good plot twist, too - it manages to get so dark that you're dreading an ending as bleak as some of the source material - and then Bale's incredibly sinister kid does something unexpected...

(Also agree with everything good that's been said about Bale's performance. Oh, and the muzzle-flash gunfight that Paleface mentions is another highlight.)
 
 
Tryphena Absent
08:51 / 18.11.03
The moment when he utterly loses it and starts to rip the plastic off the window is brilliant. There are so many references contained in that one small instance and damn it I believed his desperation.

This film is happily far closer to Huxley's Brave New World than Orwell's 1984. It brings in the drugs reference, the focus on the suppression of children and it has nothing truly messianic about it. There's that lovely undertone of absolute destruction, the type that gives you hope. The society is so contradictory that you can't help but want it gone. It's the quality of acting that just does it for you though... it's really brilliantly cast.
 
 
rakehell
03:25 / 20.11.03
You're all forgetting the bit jurer ur phgf bs gur thlf snpr naq lbh pna frr gur snpr ylvat ba gur tebhaq!!!
 
 
Mike-O
05:19 / 20.11.03
WTF are u saying, man?
 
 
Bear
06:41 / 20.11.03
I really need to see this movie again, to start with I thought you were all being sarcastic but now I realise you actually liked this movie.

I did have a hangover when I watched it and Sean Bean is in it so that probably put my off.

The pistol whip scene was good though.
 
 
Char Aina
10:07 / 20.11.03
...especially in the scene where he throws Preston to the ground, captive, in front of the public.

i thought that bit was the aweak point. he's supposed to be an emotionless member of the local librian constabulary, but all of a sudden he's got a big suspect and he loses it.

"i have brought him for yourjustice!" seemed a bit too emotive for my liking.


as gun porn goes, though, not bad.
 
 
rakehell
03:02 / 21.11.03
Sorry. I posted it in rot13 which is a pretty common way of disguising spoilers. If you go to rot13.com you'll be able to translate.
 
 
cusm
21:44 / 12.01.04
Lookie, someone did a new film adaptation of Farenheit 451, with gun porn. And its cool! How did this one slip by me when it was in theaters?

Anyways, plot being nothing original, the movie was quite good overall. I mainly really dug the gun fu. And when I say gun fu, I really mean it. The Gun Kata is a form practiced to take advantage of the most probablistic locations of enemy gun fire from all around, and effecient fireing patterns to moe down 30 guys surrounding you while fireing at you. They actually built in a rationalization for why the Clerics are so bad assed.

There's a pistol duel, where the duelists are mere feet from eachother. That alone was better than any of the gun work in the Matrix followups. Intelligent complicated kung fu fights in black latex with pistols. Its about as good as that sort of thing can get. Plot & characters, so so. Gun porn, A+.
 
 
forksclovetofu
00:17 / 13.01.04
Funny, I thought It WAS shit.
but one man's opinion and all that.
 
 
Reverend Salt
04:22 / 13.01.04
Yeah, I watched it on recommendation of a friend who enticed me with shiney guaranteed salespitches. He spoke of Plato's Republic and its guardians, the primacy of aesthetics in ethics, and oblique references to the planet Vulcan. All sure to get me to see the movie. So I did. My mistake. A crappy movie with lame ideas poorly portrayed. For a society that had rid itself of the pernicious influence of emotion, everyone but the kid sure showed a lot, and often. How many times did Taye Diggs smile smigly? How often did we witness the rage mount in our hero, even before he quit taking the drug? And 'Father' was pretty sanguine in defense of the ideals of Livian living. And really, there were a lot of guns out here in the street for a people so pacified.

And the action sequences weren't even very good. Looked like a bad video game to me.

I suppose the references to the Matrix are fair though: nothing's worse than an action movie with a thin veneer of philosophy.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
08:45 / 13.01.04
I thought the whole point was that the drugs were unable to fully suppress human emotion, all that negativity still came through to a degree but the wonder and empathy that he feels when the sun rises were completely stamped down. So the main character feels rage but he can't express it towards other people, the drug suppresses emotion but it fails to eliminate it.

the primacy of aesthetics in ethics

This seemed to be pretty clear, the scene with the puppy links up to this pretty well. He sees the sun rise and he can't turn away from it, the aesthetic keeps him from actively suppressing his emotion.

A crappy movie with lame ideas poorly portrayed

What lame ideas? How were they poorly portrayed? I don't think you've really explained why you think the film is bad. Fair enough, you didn't like it but dislike doesn't mean a film isn't good. I don't like a whole bunch of films that other people think are absolutely brilliant, Withnail & I makes me yawn incessantly but it's because I find it boring, not because it's bad. Wimmer's movie takes all the little things that can and can't happen in a society ruled by the influence of an accepted drug and describes that society. It's a comment on the fact that no drug can make you inhuman.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
08:53 / 13.01.04
nothing's worse than an action movie with a thin veneer of philosophy

Oh and another thing, this wasn't an action movie it was a science fiction movie and it referenced Aldous Huxley far more than any particular philosophy. The Matrix references eastern mysticism and fundamental Cartesian work and it's the combination of those types of philosophical thought that make the current of philosophy through the film so appalling. Equilibrium actually makes a comment about human emotion, all The Matrix does is give you a superhero who can stop bullets by reading computer code.
 
 
cusm
15:36 / 13.01.04
Its still the same plot and philosophy as Farenheit 451. The only difference is the drug and the gun porn. Its otherwise the same story, more or less. There's even a firetruck in one scene.

I did really like the gun-fu though. The rest I can take or leave, but the ass-whooping was most tasty.
 
 
Tryphena Absent
16:59 / 13.01.04
That's not a criticism unless you're commenting on all remakes and references Cusm. Most films rip off other films, the fact that Neo rips off Jesus is hardly the most interesting criticism of The Matrix.
 
  
Add Your Reply