|
|
Why? Because it cuts both ways.
We all agree that the Iraqi people don't deserve to die for the sins of their leader, who is universally acknowledged as a pitiless genocidal monster™ (® Flyboy Enterprises): why, then, would it follow that British and American civilians "deserve" to die for the sins of Messrs. Bush and Blair, about whom there is still some debate? How can your house and my house "legitimate targets," but Basra and Kirkuk not be?
Either everyone deserves it, or no one deserves it.
The minute you write any particular group off, or single any group out as "deserving" of suffering, then you've crossed a line: you're moving into a politics of division and retribution, and away from a politics of reconciliation and justice.
That's a line I'm unwilling to cross.
No one is innocent. That's not precious, that's fact.
We've all got blood on our hands, all the human race, from the days of old Brother Cain. We're going to Hell, every one of us. But we're all going down together, and we're all we've got. |
|
|