BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


WOLVERINE #186, in which Frank Castle faces some out of the place allegations

 
 
Sebastian
13:42 / 26.02.03
First of all, I didn't read it, but it caught my attention the review below from The Savage Critic.

I do not intend this to be a "fuck the writer" rant thing, but I am terribly curious to learn from any of you guys who might know better how do these things actually make it to the stand nowadays by 2003, I mean, what might have the editor actually thought of it, who else should have advised, who is going to reply to any association that may call them, what would they reply, or they really are all brain-dead-fascists and don't give a shit -even considering that editing Wolverine could definitely kill your neurons. In short: how does this work. All this because I remember Cameron Stewart here saying he does not draw everything he reads in the script, and he also discusses and impacts in the content of the book, definitely making it clear for me that for some occasions comic book publishing is indeed a team work.

Here is the review:

WOLVERINE #186: Ouch. I was almost sorta liking it fine as a Wolverine/Punisher fight comic until we got to the last few pages. Logan ultimately “beats” Castle by finding men’s muscle mags in Castle’s bag., and...um, crushing Castle’s self-esteem, I guess. Let’s put aside for minute that this seems about as out of character as out of character could be – Castle himself would seem to have zero sexuality, and, even if he were gay, I can’t imagine any other reaction than “So what?” as he pulls out another gun and shoots Logan in the face, right? – but the real crime here is reducing it to schoolyard “Yeah? Well you... you... you’re a fag!” That’s not only juvenile, but I think it is irresponsible ESPECIALLY in a “kids buy” title like Wolverine. They’re pulling smoking out of Wolverine because of the social message it brings, but they’re going to imply that it is OK to gay bash? That might be the San Franciscan in me, but that is a pretty crummy thing. I’m really disturbed this got through Marvel editorial, and I really hope this doesn’t find it’s way into the hands of any glbt anti-defamation groups. This could bring a lot of negative publicity. Crap.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
13:46 / 26.02.03
Eh. The X-Axis review is better written if you ask me.

Listen man, it's amazing to me that ANYTHING Frank Tieri writes gets published. This isn't all that shocking given Tieri's utter lack of talent.
 
 
Yotsuba & Benjamin!
14:09 / 26.02.03
I actually ripped this comic in four seperate pieces after reading it. It was really the most awful thing I've ever read, gay snipe aside. Just terrible from top to bottom.
 
 
Matthew Fluxington
14:21 / 26.02.03
Why on earth did you buy it to begin with, I'm wondering?
 
 
moriarty
15:20 / 26.02.03
1. Think he read the "Beard Hunter" issue of Doom Patrol?

2. You'd think James "Leather Suspenders" Logan could relate.

3. I kind of like the cover.
 
 
Yotsuba & Benjamin!
15:39 / 26.02.03
Flux:
a) The Punisher/Wolverine issues of Punisher reminded me why some part of me enjoyed Ennis' take on Mr. Castle, so I figured I'd give the flipside a shot.
2) It *is* an Alonzo book so maybe this issue would turn out okay.
c) The Dodson's ain't bad.

Oh, how wrong I was.
 
 
Sebastian
16:15 / 26.02.03
I am sorry for the character, which I can't remember so far who ever got to handle him with dignity, precisely, as "dignity" is supposedly something Wolverine has toughly dealt with.

But anyway, this sort of thing makes me think that, yes, in the end, every publishing house is a not-even-disguised little piece of worthless human shit in the street, caring to polish its most talked about titles, which are supposeddly addressed to some elite readership that honors "creative values", and also literally throw well packed, inked, colored & lettered bullshit that splats you in the face even if you haven't even looked at it. And with ads also.
 
 
some guy
16:46 / 26.02.03
editing Wolverine could definitely kill your neurons

The worst thing is that it doesn't have to. The first two Wolverine miniseries (Miller/Milgrom) were excellent, and the first few issues of the ongoing were intelligent enough for an action series. There's no real reason Wolverine couldn't be as good as, say, Lone Wolf and Cub.
 
 
Sebastian
17:15 / 26.02.03
You are right. Agreed to the utmost. The title should be fairly good by itself. We all know zillions of examples of "lone" characters standing in well-done series for decades.

But what I meant is that, beyond the story and the whole craft, I suppose what does kill your neurons is dealing with all the extra stuff that brings participating in any aspect of a title that is the world-wide known iconic face of an editorial house. Look at Spider-Man. Does it also have to be as dead as it is? I personally think JMS will regret from a creative stand having taking the job, but anyway who knows, and cares. Wolverine and Spider-Man as characters and books I think are doomed from the perspective that they are pretty much the faces of Marvel, and even if writing them does not fry your brain, at least you should appear as it does, or they'll make it look like they have. In ths line of thought, I really don't care whatever is the status of Tieri's brain.
 
 
The Falcon
19:51 / 26.02.03
Greg Rucka might do an okay job, though, on the other hand with the relaunch. I quite enjoyed his work on Detective Comics, at any rate.
 
 
Solitaire Rose as Tom Servo
17:20 / 01.03.03
I thought it was strange that Wolverine has finally gotten back in the top 10 selling comics, it was finally being cancelled and re-launched. Maybe it makes me a fanboy of some kind, but I keep thinking that this could be a great comic book series, and yet they keep putting forth painful stories like this one...it's almost as if the creative teams don't ever want the book to sell well.

Let's see, Claremont puts the character in a bad verion of "Terry and and Pirates" and effectively buries the comics with the first 10 issues. Then they switch creative teams ever 6 issues after Claremont is bounced, and even Archie Goodwin and John Byrne can't put together a decent story. Follow that with Larry Hama making it an ultraviolent kids book (The whole Elsie-D/Albert thing)...and by the time Hama's contract is up, the book goes from team to team, as if they can't figure out what to do with the comic.

Now, it's written a a friend of an editor who does an issue like this, a bad attempt at Garth Ennis's "Dark Humor" Punisher. It reminds me of when a 7 year old tries to tell a very complicated joke he heard from a grown-up that he knows other people finds funny, but he can't understand enough to get the joke, let alone tell it right.

I hope Greg Rucka can pull something out of his hat for it, but I can't understand why such a simple character can't be used for decent stories.
 
 
The Photographer in Blowup
20:11 / 01.03.03
Let's see, Claremont puts the character in a bad verion of "Terry and and Pirates" and effectively buries the comics with the first 10 issues.

Well, this is just my opinion, but i always found those earlier stories in Madripor the best of the book. It wasn't about Wolverine, the X-Men. It was just a guy called Logan who wore a patch and liked to get drunk with his friends and get in fights with sailors... oh, and vampires.

Then they switch creative teams ever 6 issues after Claremont is bounced, and even Archie Goodwin and John Byrne can't put together a decent story. Follow that with Larry Hama making it an ultraviolent kids book (The whole Elsie-D/Albert thing)...and by the time Hama's contract is up, the book goes from team to team, as if they can't figure out what to do with the comic.

Can't argue with you there: Lary Hama only turned the book into a convulted mess; everything Barry Windsor-Smith did in his classic story Weapon X, Hama ruined with his inclusion of continuity contrivances like Silver Fox, and added a whole new bunch of meaningless characters that added more questions than answers: Shiva, Aldo Ferro, the new members from the Weapon X who got killed immediately. And he killed the only guys who knew the truth about Wolverine's past: Hines, the Professor.

No wonder Origins was so poor concerning content: it didn't have much to work with.
 
 
Sebastian
23:05 / 01.03.03
It was just a guy called Logan who wore a patch and liked to get drunk with his friends and get in fights with sailors... oh, and vampires.

I am not sure it wil involve vampires and sailors, but from what I read -I think it was aninterview at Newsarama- the relaunch will focus in Logan the man. Also, the reader won't know much about whatever is going through Wolverine's mind, meaning practically no "internal dilogue" stuff.

Althouh I dropped the title several times, I always keep an eye on it. I wish I knew for certain it will become worth the reading again.
 
 
The Photographer in Blowup
18:13 / 02.03.03
I am not sure it wil involve vampires and sailors, but from what I read -I think it was aninterview at Newsarama- the relaunch will focus in Logan the man. Also, the reader won't know much about whatever is going through Wolverine's mind, meaning practically no "internal dilogue" stuff.

Nah, i think Rucka is taking Wolverine along canadian roads, so no vampires and sailors like back in Madripor... although those stories were pretty cool.

Rucka is more the sort of guy that will make the book mysterious and suspenseful, and hopefully, put some brains back in it. And it's about time Wolverine stops being so much about gratuitous violence, and more on the character of Logan.

No thought ballons? Great.
 
 
The Falcon
20:08 / 03.03.03
Frank Tieri has responded to these allegations:

At X-Fan.

And Joe Quesada responds to our own lovely Smile here

See what you make of them.
 
 
Regrettable Juvenilia
09:04 / 04.03.03
Joe Quesada's forum is members only - any chance you could cut'n'paste, Duncan?

And surprise, surprise: Tierie thinks people need to "get a sense of humour"...
 
 
The Falcon
12:22 / 04.03.03
Joe Q:"We can’t win, first we have to deal with people going all nuts because Marvel has a gay cowboy and now we have to deal with this extreme? Anytime the Punisher is involved these days in the Marvel U, you can expect the unexpected. The Punisher and especially the Punisher book, for better or worse is a farce, a comedy, a Road Runner cartoon parodied to the Nth degree. Does anyone remember his battles with Spidey or DD? If you haven’t gotten that by now then you’ve kind of missed the point of the book or of the character when he appears in a book.

What Frank (Tieri) was doing was invoking a line from Neil Simon's "Murder By Death" that was making fun of the stereotypical movie tough guy -- in this case, a gumshoe detective played by Peter Falk. Frank figured, what bigger tough guys are there in the Marvel U than Frank Castle and Logan?

The key to the joke is that the line is inconclusive and ambiguous. In some cases the line may say more about how it’s being interpreted than what it’s actually saying. Is Frank Castle gay just because he's got some muscle men mags? I think not, heck I have muscle men mags all over my art table for super hero art reference. No, really! But let's say, just for the sake of argument, that Castle IS gay. Well then, that makes him one tough motherluvin’ gay guy, does it not? Would you mess with him?

Bottom line is people need to grow a sense of humor. For anyone who thinks we've actually "outed" Frank Castle, I'd say this: Whether you decide he's straight or gay at the end of the issue, he's still the stone killer you'd never mess with.

I see the closing scene as Logan's final eff you to Punisher. I mean, the way Garth writes Castle -- and Garth agrees -- is as a right-wing madman. A manly man to the Nth degree. Clint Eastwood on steroids. There's no gray area in his world. Logan, having just beaten him to a pulp, reminds him -- with a wink-wink -- that the world is plenty gray.

This is an extension of their entire conversation, in which Castle asserts that all bad guys should die, and Logan tells him it's an impossible dream. In this story, Logan's the realist, and Castle is the idealist.
"

And in reply to me: "See my previous post. By the way folks, unless someone hasn’t told me something, gay men have a sense of humor too.", we also get the patented sense of humour line.
 
 
The Photographer in Blowup
13:37 / 04.03.03
Okay!

Frank Tieri is still a bad writer.
 
 
Ray Von
13:52 / 04.03.03
Yep! It sure was one shitty issue! The Ennis Punisher issues were pretty good, (as one would expect from Garth). But did any midgets take offence from these?
 
 
Sebastian
10:29 / 05.03.03
Duncan, I wish you'd never posted that... God, now I realise that the JoeQ board is kinda "I'll tell you what you didn't get, you, rush & ignorant reader", and for Wolverine...

But let's say, just for the sake of argument, that Castle IS gay.

Shit! So that was the point at chubby's boards, right? And no one cared that Logan who's over a century old and embedded in samurai lore is boasting this as a victory -or whatever- as if he had suddenly delivered a line coming out of Apocalypse's lips. What the fuck is that supposed to mean then?

In some cases the line may say more about how it’s being interpreted than what it’s actually saying.

Oh my, how sophisticated Tieri and chubby really are, yes, thanks guys, now I know you are not really fascists, and you should include sentences like that in an appendix of the trade to make the reader think he is actually reading good literary stuff that raises understanding to a next level...

'xcuse me, but I think I am going to throw up.
 
 
Mister Six, whom all the girls
14:28 / 05.03.03
Resisting the urge to puke my ring myself. I know nothing of this issue, but my response os to Q's post.

I think the big problem for me in this is that Q is not aware of why people are upset over things like Rawhide Kid, and this new rot.

SOAPBOX ALERT:
It's not making characters gay, it's exploiting that. Doesn't he see that by having a big beautiful dude in leather blowing at the end of his gun, looking for a new rider is exploiting the idea?? Like Modesty Blaise in a tub, breasts heaving, drinking a magnum of champagne... It doesn't support the character, nor does it respect the character type. Why can't a character just be gay?? Why do they have to be gay like Northstar (inside this issue! A startling truth revealed!!)? I mean, are all gay people very loud brash types who define themselves by their sexuality? It's like the old days of Marvel in the 70's where all black people came from the ghetto and were struggling to climb that ladder and grab a piece of the pie (well, I think that's still alive and well in the Daredevil movie and what's with Bendis' Luke Cage wearing a took and listening to his 'phones while talking to Daredevil??? Since when is he the ghetto-est of the ghetto??).

Comics are just to embarassing sometimes. You get characters well defined and full of personality in comics like the Invisibles, then but predominantly comics are crap rags written by deluded white guys who couldn't get a 'real job' and have carved a niche for themselves in this little subcultural medium.
END SOAP BOX ALERT

I'm just going to re-read my Modesty Blaise post now... don't mind me.
 
 
The Falcon
16:35 / 05.03.03
Well, Cage has allus been the ghetto-est. Bendis has toned that down a fair bit, actually.

Let's talk about the Cage mini. I really liked it.
 
 
glassonion
18:45 / 05.03.03
i only bought that on the strength of banner and it let me down a little bit. tombstone could've been better if he'd been 'solid as marble' tombstone. like the way bendis is making cage, well, a bit mercenary really, all his homespun nimby moralising covering up the fact he'll only get off his arse if the green's right. as for the punisher being batty, [and it being his defeat, which is where the real problem is], the introduction of any kind of sexual element in a punisher story really mashes the stonekiller aspect of it, which is the punisher's whole joke. the punisher doesn't have sex. he may well have a toss every now and again [although i reckon killing twenty bad guys is probably a more effective way of venting autonomic tension], but don't musclemags have pictures of girls in too?
 
 
The Falcon
20:52 / 05.03.03
like the way bendis is making cage, well, a bit mercenary really, all his homespun nimby moralising covering up the fact he'll only get off his arse if the green's right.

Azz wrote the mini, but you know that. Yeah - 'Luke Cage, Hero for Hire', y'know. Gotta get some paper, and that.
 
 
glassonion
14:45 / 06.03.03
yeah azz had it good by riffing fistful of dollars to make cage do the smart thing, the right thing and get paid in the bargain. i like the way azzarello writes hair. his preening doc samson is the definitive one for me now.

did you read ultimate war duncan? i've got a real bee in my bonnet about this because i've stuck up for millar for so longand loved his work way back when. sometimes i think everyone hates superheroes except for me and thee, and sometimes i wonder about thee. ultimate war's good feature was that they had to nuke colossus to stop him, making me love him as much as i did back in the secret wars when he takes apart the wrecking crew and doc oc all at the same time cos he's missing kitty and needs a wank. ultimate colossus is clearly second only to ult hulk in ruffness, with the bonus that he knows kung fu, and so is tuffest of all. but captain america and wolverine didn't even fight! that sucks the most! how does it so totally blow at the same time?! excelsior tru believers etc. etc.
 
 
The Falcon
19:31 / 06.03.03
That's by far the best post I've ever read here, glassonion.

I fucking love superheroes. Everyone does, they just associate purchasing comics mentally with the oddballs they see in the store. But look how many people go to see the films. If it weren't for superheroes, there'd be no Flex Mentallo, and the world would be a fucklot weaker for its' absence. How good was JLA when GM wrote it?

Haus really likes them, just watch. He barely posts but I'm aware he's reading Ultimates and Alias. I'd highly recommend Daredevil also.

Ultimate War is okay. It's a marked advance from what I've read of Millar's DCU work; but the Ultimates is the real deal. I got a comics pinger about Colossus in #4 also.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
20:22 / 06.03.03
Dude, I *love* superheroes. I read Alias (although I find it patchy), Ultimates, NXM, the Filth, Exiles (not sure why on this one), occasionally Powers and only recently dropped JLA and Ultimate X-Men. I've got the Generation X TV movie on *video*, darn it. I maintain that JLA and Doom Patrol were probably Morrison's best work, and Enigma some of Milligan's, and can say with absolute confidence that Warren Ellis' work on Excalibur and Stormwatch beat the crap out of Strange Kisses.

Mind you, there's probably a whole new thread in this - "Do you like superhero comics, and if so why?" I think a lot of people find that the superhero genre is, as glassonion suggests, tied up with fatbeards and what Runce rather unwisely referred to as "the Trenchcoat Brigade", and stops people from taking comics seriosuly as a medium, and thus not respecting the interesting, alternative comics that they, the intelligent and discerning comics consumer, buys, whereas I'd probably suggest that the absence of anyone actually buying them probably has more of an impact on that (see my oft-repeated comments on Trina Robbins). Yeah....anyone fancy starting a new thread on superhero comics in general, or searching to see if there is one already?
 
 
moriarty
21:05 / 06.03.03
Maybe I should wait for the new thread, but...

I think it's a little presumptuous to suggest that the people on this board don't like superheroes, and even worse to say that they don't like superheroes because they relate them to fatbeards. It's silly to say that people who enjoyed Flex Mentallo should also like superheroes, when in fact, Flex is a superhero and that's probably why they liked it.

Almost everybody I know that you would think disliked superheroes (I'm thinking The Comics Journal here) actually really loves the stuff. They just don't like superhero comics indiscriminately, and, (shock, horror!) they may have different or wider tastes in the genre than you do. As a matter of fact, I'd personally say that many alternative cartoonists do the absolute best superheroes, mainly because they have the most fun with them. Well, I'd say all that, but then I'd be showing where my love of superheroes lie (mainly in the doesn't-take-itself-so-seriously Silver Age).

There are lots of different types of superhero comics. Just because I have very little interest in the Ultimate line doesn't mean that I hate superheroes. And sometimes people just fall out of love with the genre (just like people fall out of Westerns, Mysteries, Horror, etc.) Notice that I didn't say "grow out of".

Considering that we once had a fairly lengthy discussion on M.O.D.O.K., I'd hazard a guess that Barbelith holds a place in its heart for superhero comics and isn't ashamed to talk about.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
07:58 / 07.03.03
Oh dear. You used "shock, horror!" as a rhetorical device. That means I can no longer take anything you say seriously, and must knock your coat off the peg with the apple painted underneath it.

I would say that it is fairly obvious that most people who contribute regularly to this forum *do* like superhero comics of some stamp or other, and are more than happy to weave that fact into their own conceptions of being more discerning and intelligent than everybody else in whatever way they find appropriate. It so happened that Runce did it by identifying the "Trenchcoat Brigade", whereas others do it by decrying the Ultimate line, or Peter David or capital-W Whatever.

Now, personally personally my favorite superhero cartoonist is Evan Dorkin, and I only wish he would be picked up for a mainstream superhero title, but even after X-Force I find it somewhat unlikely. Maybe if Elizabeth Watashin did some of the art...
 
 
glassonion
08:41 / 07.03.03
i don't think we need a new thread, we're all rotters round here.

i read a dorkin comic once, total wank, misanthropy and lack of sexiness oozing out of every panel. 'Canadian Age' comics i call em. the idea of dairy products gone bad going bad is obviously very good tho. what stuff has he done to make him yr fave s-hero cartoonist? btw cheers for the doomlord link over the way there, that site is the kind of thing i'd do myself if i could be bothered..

my best alt cartoonist gone superhero is obviously paul grist, and pope i guess as long as he's not writing it as well [see! how the gamine adolescent finds herself unimpressed! with the future! wow!].

i don't want to seem too much of a morrison-bitch by saying this, but i think superhero is what comics does best: history, documentary, western, horror, soap-opera, sci-fi, kitchen-sink drama all find their best expression in books, on telly, at the movies, in a theatre or somewhere else. superheroes, as the daredevil movie shows, is better left on a four colour page.

and as far as the modok thread goes, modok is a super-VILLAIN dumbass. i hate supervillains, which is why i like the comics they get beaten up in. more than that i hate the ultimates [characters, not book itself] - i've never read a superhero book where i've been so desperate for all the main characters to get killed. go magneto!
 
 
Sebastian
11:17 / 07.03.03
Puf, I thought I'd never find this quote by guess who that Galssonion paraphrases above:

There are better fantasy writers, better historical novelists or romance authors in the 'mainstream' than there are in comics ... But...
...no-one in any other medium has written better superhero stories than Mark Millar or Alan Moore or Warren Ellis ... no-one anywhere but here. Superheroes are the thing comics do best. Superheroes allow us to bring images of futurity into mundane reality and study them in glowing colors.
 
 
The Falcon
12:03 / 07.03.03
Is that a GM quote then, Seb?

Now, personally personally my favorite superhero cartoonist is Evan Dorkin, and I only wish he would be picked up for a mainstream superhero title, but even after X-Force I find it somewhat unlikely. Maybe if Elizabeth Watashin did some of the art...

Dude - look at Marvel.com, Dorkin's doing a couple of issues of Agent X, and a Thing 'Startling Stories' special, 'Night Falls On Yancy Street'. I've never read his superhero work, only the excellent 'Milk and Cheese: Dairy Products Gone Bad'. What's he done in superhero comics? Or do you count that?

I don't want all the Ultimates to die. I like Iron Man, Thor and Wasp.
 
 
Sebastian
12:12 / 07.03.03
Yes, its from a GM interview titled "THE FILTHY THOUGHTS of GRANT MORRISON". I think it was from Newsarama. Tell me if you want it and I'll e-mail it.
 
 
ONLY NICE THINGS
13:04 / 07.03.03
Mainly I was thinkign of the occasional sketches he does in Dork!, whichj are very fun and Silver Agey, but he has done some episodes of Batman Beyond and the opriginal Animated Series, I think, as scriptwriter, and wrote the anthology artists project "World's Funniest", which showed an abiding love of and knowledge of the DC mythos and has a brilliant Dark Knight Returns piss-take.

Jim Mahfood's Generation X stuff had its moments too, but for the art rather than the script.
 
  
Add Your Reply