Y'know what I mean: that creature into whom you morph when confronted with the inescapable barrage of appraisal, assessment, audit, etc.; that hideously perky version of yourself which feigns necessary enthusiasm in those aspects of the job you really can't be arsed with; the team-player-yet-autonomous-decision-maker you become when you have to package and present yourself to your peers.
This is on my mind lately because I've just emerged from the shadow of my Specialist Registrar Research Presentation. Basically, at my pre-consultant level, we're afforded one day each week to undertake a research project of our choice. Not surprisingly, many of us choose to research Selfridges, the Ritzy or the insides of our eyelids, initiating a long, drawn-out, largely tokenistic piece of research for the sake of appearances. When it comes to presenting the fruits of our half-hearted labours, there's a last-minute rush to massage scanty data into something halfway presentable.
I've been worrying about mine since Christmas, and finally got the damned thing over with on Wednesday. To my considerable surprise, it went rather well, and I think this is partly due to my deciding to change my usual style of presentation. Instead of affecting the standard, faintly cheerleaderesque manner, I was more honest, admitting from the start that I generally disliked having to do research at all, and it'd been really difficult to come up with something which interested me much. Others agreed emphatically, and it felt good to have injected a little more frankness into my own dealings. I like my researcher persona slightly more than before.
Anyway, does this strike a chord with anyone else? Anyone feel required to 'package' themselves for the workplace - and has anyone tried to break through or slide around that packaging? Did it work? |