BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Your gut instinct, now...

 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
 
aus
14:44 / 17.02.03
These random, hypothetical, pseudo-survival scenarios do not wash with me.

Obviously the choice of huggles or sausages is dependent on circumstances. A huggles-deprived person will choose huggles, a starving person will choose sausages.

What do mean by "pseudo"? Is it redundant with hypothetical? Do you mean it to literally mean "false", and that living on sausages alone would be a false survival? Perhaps you mean that living on sausages alone would be a fate worse than death? Please explain.
 
 
Cherry Bomb
08:35 / 18.02.03
Huggles with sausages and fries on the side...
 
 
wembley can change in 28 days
09:25 / 18.02.03
would this imply that snausages (dog snack) is a combination of sausage and snog? any room for huggles in there?

(huggle - vegetarians get no choice)
 
 
Whisky Priestess
18:23 / 18.02.03
Sausages. You can trust sausages.
Ad what in the Sam Hill is a schnoogle?
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
20:16 / 18.02.03
Huggles with a bell on the end. There's time for sausages later -- and if there really isn't, wouldn't you rather have huggles?

"Sam Hill"? Whiskey, that's cowboy talk.
 
 
ephemerat
01:42 / 19.02.03
What do mean by "pseudo"? Is it redundant with hypothetical? Do you mean it to literally mean "false", and that living on sausages alone would be a false survival? Perhaps you mean that living on sausages alone would be a fate worse than death? Please explain.

Have been waiting for someone to pick me up on this...

I could argue that you wouldn't survive long on sausages alone, but I still think you'd survive longer than on a huggle-specific diet (Far Eastern homilies regarding yin/yang imbalances notwithstanding). In other words: um, yeah, the inclusion of "pseudo" remains redundant and I am, indeed, a damn fool.

Luckily, my previous post also proves "Muphry's Law" which states that any attempt at correction is statistically likely to contain a mistake of dimensions commensurate with, or exceeding, the original perceived error.

So that's okay, then.
 
 
aus
03:00 / 19.02.03
So it's sausages?
 
 
paw
12:12 / 19.02.03
SAUSAGES!
 
 
8===>Q: alyn
13:22 / 19.02.03
Oh, God, I was so wrong! Saugages! It's sausages!
 
 
aus
03:29 / 20.02.03
Colonel Qalyn has seen the light!

Unfortunately, the light is caused by a grease fire.
SAVE THE SAUSAGES! SAVE THE SAUSAGES!
 
 
ephemerat
15:53 / 20.02.03
So it's sausages?

Only if it's just for a month. See if we stretched your hypothetical scenario out to a year, for example, I find it highly unlikely that you could survivve on sausages and water alone. Malnutrition and vitamin deficiencies would set in and you would die a slow, lonely and painful death. And if a slow, lonely and painful death is inevitable anyway, what you really need are huggles and lots of them. In other words: when the chips are to the wall and your back's to the grindstone and all seems bleak and lost what you will really want will be a huggle.

So I have to say; huggles it still is.
 
  

Page: 1(2)

 
  
Add Your Reply