BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


Magical combat

 
 
illmatic
10:19 / 12.02.03
In his book Chaotopia, Dave Lee lists the 4 main areas where sorcery (magick to affect the external world) will be worked – money, sex and healing are the first three, the fourth magick for personal power, which in practice is most likely to be expressed as combat. Cursing is one of the more dodgy areas of magick, the type of thing most likely to put the wind up non-magicians. so I thought it might be useful to have a thread about it.

In part this was sparked off by an observation of several thread on the board where people talk about there conflicts with others. I was wondering if when we get involved in conflicts with others, we largely act from very intense emotions – pride, fear or anger being the obvious ones. I was wondering if when we do this we tend to reduce other people’s complexity. Rather than see them as a whole person subject to the same variety of thoughts, feelings and confusions as ourselves, we simplify them, and begin to view them solely as an agent generating this fear/pride/anger/whatever. As simply an obstruction – and as such, fair game to be removed with a curse or any other magickal technique. Obviously there will be situations where this dynamic doesn’t apply, where someone may well be imposing their will on you in an unjust and arbitrary manner, where some kind of magickal intervention might be fitting – but how do you tell the difference? What makes you sure? What circumstances would it take before YOU were to do this? Might it not be better for enchantments to re-orientate our own point of view? (I’ve got a technique in mind here which I may post below). And finally, if you were going to do this, what techniques would you use – good old fashioned dolls or pins or newfangled cybermorphic astral entities?

I might add that I’ve never done any aggressive magick in my life, and don’t intend to. It’s possible I might, but I kind of think about it in the same way I’d think about punching someone in the face – possible, but not very likely.

Part my motivation for starting this thread also is to fish for juicy and interesting anecdotes, so if you’ve got any stories you’d like to share, feel free.

Another interesting point this brings up is the ethics of directing magick at other people – what do people feel about this? ‘Specially if they don’t know? Is it right to do something powerful positive for a friend – doesn’t this run the risk of all kinds of unanticipated consequences? What do people reckon?

Also, I’d like to point out that my comments above are in no way directed at anyone personally or intended to cause insult to people who have been raising these sort of questions on the board - I don’t know you or your situations, and I don’t think I’m in a position to judge.

Any thoughts?
 
 
Warewullf up North
10:48 / 12.02.03
The only aggressive magick I've done was directed towards a right cow in the last place I worked. She made everyone's life miserable and was a complete bitch. After trying to go the "proper" way about it (Ie. complaining to managment) I resorted to magick. Getting her fired didn't work, nor did convincing her to quit so I ended up creating a servitor-type creature (which happened entirely spontaniously, by the way.) to keep her in her office and away from me. It worked really well.

The servitor was a strange experience. I'd never been able to make one before or since. I was thinking about what to do when this being popped into my head, complete with a list of instructions and he looked like a superhero I'd designed as a kid! I could "see" and feel this creature quite clearly. He became less effective over time, as I'd stopped giving him attention/energy. I re-absorbed him on the day I left the company.
 
 
Quantum
13:30 / 12.02.03
Duelling between magicians is sometimes called Certamen, and any magician worth their wand should have defensive magick just in case, but using magick on somebody who is mundane is less morally clear. I tend to find that magick is often self regulating though; In Ware's example only the least dynamic spell worked, the one that had least impact- but it did the job nicely. Just goes to show, subtlety is best.
 
 
Quantum
13:34 / 12.02.03
Sorry, forget to tell my anecdote. When I was a teenager, my uncle taught my friend and I a blessing. The spell could be reversed to become a curse, which I have never used. My (foolish) friend was being given a hard time by a teacher we all hated (religious bigot teaching RE) and so used the curse on him. Later that week, said teacher had a heart attack and had to retire. Beware cursing.
 
 
Bear
14:02 / 12.02.03
I like the Punch on the Nose comment, that's how I try to look at things at least on the whole curses side of things, if you wouldn't smack em one why would you bother cursing them to cause damage. I think people tend to let their emotions take over due to the fact that there's no direct confrontation which is pretty damn dangerous IMHO.

Although using the same system I guess the whole duelling thing makes sense, people go to Karate or other martial arts and don't leave the building kicking people in the face. The knowledge on how to protect yourself is a good thing surely.

Anecdote - Used to direct anger at people when I was younger, in a energy beam form bad things happened, don't do that anymore I'm a nice bear now.

But don't go slagging of my post because it doesn't make sense or I'll send my servitor Poke' round to your house to poke you in the eye - Grrrrr!
 
 
LVX23
16:57 / 12.02.03
...we tend to reduce other people’s complexity. Rather than see them as a whole person subject to the same variety of thoughts, feelings and confusions as ourselves, we simplify them, and begin to view them solely as an agent generating this fear/pride/anger/whatever.

I agree with this statement. I believe that when a person is born they are more or less a blank slate (aside from whatever karmic inheritances they've carried into this incarnation). But basically a child is empty and as it grows and experiences life, it takes on personalities, memories, emotions, scars, complexes, fears, hatreds, etc... all dependent upon the experiences of Hir life. Trauma, abuse, neglect, violence - all these things can turn a simple child into an angry, ill-tempered, malign adult.

Every person you hate or loathe or fear is ultimately a result of their own life. This is not to say they aren't responsible for who they are - anyone can change. But, as Illmatic noted, it is common for us to see people only for the traits they expose to us, ignoring the complexities of their own personal history.

For these reasons, among others, I think it's best to enchant for enlightenment of the individual rather than their destruction. Or at least to seek the most benign route to averting their negative impact on your life, like Warewolf's servitor. But, IMHO, to will negativity towards others is to invert the pentagram (though some bastards sure seem to deserve it...).
 
 
slinkyvagabond
19:36 / 12.02.03
Yes, Mr. I, I do agree. Generally speaking the source of my anger/pain is me so naturally it is better to direct any work on said anger/pain at myself. But I don't think there's any harm is using protective magic which I feel is in strong contrast to combat or offensive magic. Protecting yourself from influnces which then may react with your own personality/feelings in a negative way really harms no-one, thus there's no ethical questions about using it on, haha, "normals". But you are damn right, few people are malicious with intent - which is a scary thing, as it speaks of an immense lack of self-control. Plus, if you work on your own nexus of feelings-experiences it should eventualy provide the added bonus of you not being overly affected by anyone else's bad behaviour. Though I like the idea of Magickal sparring contests. I wish I could do that...*sigh*....

Oh yeah, I have a visualisation for self-protection. If I can remember it properly I'll post it. I do hope someone posts a description of a magickal sparring match...hey, I never said I wasn't a sensationalist....
 
 
trouser the trouserian
11:12 / 13.02.03
...the ethics of directing magick at other people

Hmm. Another tricky question Mr.I. There's something very 'addictive' about the feeling that one is able to magically intervene in another person's life - be it for better or for worse. This is being highlighted at the moment in 'Buffy' as Willow attempts to kick her magick habit. I've run into folk who rail against cursing but think it's okay to do 'healing' or interfere in a relationship that they see as 'going wrong', 'cos of course, "that's white magic" - though to my mind, no less invasive than messing about with dolls & pins. Whenever I'm tempted to make a magical intervention, I try and examine my own motivation for doing so, ask the counsel of a friend or three (if possible) and reflect on how I'd feel if someone did *that* to me. For example, a few years ago, I copped off with someone after an occult soiree. Next day, that person's ex popped around and with great satisfaction announced that they'd done "some magic" to ensure that we got together - implying that it wouldn't have happened had they not done their stuff, which I found annoying, to say the least.
 
 
illmatic
11:14 / 13.02.03
Thanks for all your comments. I thought i’d stick a technique I find useful, bearing in mind the stuff about perspective etc. I’ve posted about it before, but wtf.

It’s the Neither/Neither technique of Austin Spare’s as taken from the works of Stephen Mace – Basically it involves seeing belief as a kind of energy that’s bound up in certain situations, which you “free” by taking on opposing beliefs. The more intense the situation, the more intense the release of energy. This energy can be used to charge sigils etc. For instance, if your having a huge row with your partner you might take on board the belief that your own possessiveness, clinging or pig-headness is contributing to the situation, or recognise your partners need for space or whatever. You could charge a sigil for greater communication (or even a new partner!) If you’ve got a boss you want to kill, at the height of your revenge fantasy, imagine how they appear to their loved ones. Charge a sigil for a new job.

At the root of this idea is that no belief is an absolute truth, only a tempoary one at best, everything being condtioned by time, perspective, predjuice etc - "Nothing is true, everything is permitted".It’s a good technique for sorcery and serves as a kind of mental house-cleaning as well. Helps cultivate a more flexible attitude, I think.

(Advert – I’ve just got 3 brilliant new books by Mace from Dagon Productions. Cheap, no payment problems, fast delivery – across the Atlantic in 7 days, well recommended. - /end advert)
 
 
pinksunfaerie
12:58 / 13.02.03
this is my first ever message! hello--

I was really interested in your comments re magic towards others. i've always been a bit wary of interfering and I have had some strange experiences in this field, despite having never consciously performed spells ON other people when it happened.

An argument in a thunderstorm with a guy i knew in london resulted in all the electrical appliances in his flat blowing. Scared me a bit as you can imagine...

Since the experince in London though i have been more focussed magically - in that instance it was not the concentration of my power that had effect but the LACK of it, and that outburst frightened me as it was totally unexpected.

In my experience the most startling effects come from the offering of my positive energy to the situation rather than the banishment of negative - i try to heal ills by inviting *good* in to a situation instead of focusing on bad. Bad energy will disipate when there is good given to replace it.

I recently performed a spoken binding on someone who was exercising great violence towards me. It was gentle, polite and i seem to have got the peace that i asked for.
 
 
Rev. Jesse
17:20 / 13.02.03
If you prohibit yourself from performing aggressive magic or magic upon other people because of anachronistic terrestrial ethics, then you have unnecessarily crippled yourself by limiting your tools and abilities.

Consider that, even without magic, you are probably already attempting to manipulate people, consciously or subconsciously, to achieve your ends. Other people are attempting to manipulate you as well. It is our human nature as social animals to attempt to interact with each other in a profitable manner. Why would you impose a harsher code of ethics over one half of your life and not over another?

This is not to say that it is a requirement that an effective magician must perform magic on other, clearly each operation must be designed individually based upon its goals and the tools available, merely that it is an unnecessarily weakness to dismiss one possible mode of operation out of hand.
 
  
Add Your Reply