BARBELITH underground
 

Subcultural engagement for the 21st Century...
Barbelith is a new kind of community (find out more)...
You can login or register.


North Korean pre-emptive strike against the US

 
 
Fist Fun
09:49 / 06.02.03
"The United States says that after Iraq, we are next", said the deputy director Ri Pyong-gap, "but we have our own countermeasures. Pre-emptive attacks are not the exclusive right of the US."

Read a report on this in Der Spiegel. Frightening stuff. Is it all bluff though and is it it wise to openly threaten America?
 
 
Baz Auckland
11:38 / 06.02.03
This is scary stuff. Does anyone know what relations are like between North Korea and China? It seems like China's keeping out of all this, for or against, which is strange given the proximity.
 
 
Ray Von
14:11 / 06.02.03
The Scary thing is everyones rattling on about Iraq and its hidden weapons of mass destruction and heres North Korea going on about pre-emptive strikes on the U.S. It doesn't take a genius to work out which is potentially the bigger threat! If North Korea had Iraqs oilfields then it would probably be a smouldering crater by now with the drills and pipelines moving in!
 
 
sleazenation
15:00 / 06.02.03
I think it more likely that if Iraq had North Korea's nuclear capability there would be a more concerted diplomatic effort.

While oil is all nice and good its the nukes that make the major powers play nice.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
15:34 / 06.02.03
Something I can't get out of my head but couldn't find an appropriate thread to post it in (until now, obviously...)

The Guardian, Wednesday February 5th

From a piece called "With friends like these..." by the wonderful Paul Foot.

"When the SNP MP Alex Salmond shouted at him (Blair) last week 'when do we stop?' Blair rounded on him, eyes gleaming like those of Arturo Ui in Brecht's play: 'We stop when the threat to our security is properly and fully dealt with.' In other words, we go on like Ui, until we conquer the world.


Every time I read that paragraph I get a shiver down my spine. And not a nice one, either.

And Christ, N Korea launching a pre-emptive strike would be really bad, but I don't think the West has any moral high-ground left given our attitude towards Iraq. The US is undoubtedly a threat to North Korea (and to an extent with reason). Iraq's status threatwise as regards the US/UK is somewhat dodgier.
 
 
alas
21:53 / 06.02.03
that's the problem with this administration--it throws out so many international agreements, flouts diplomatic conventions, and then is shocked, SHOCKED!, when other countries follow the US's lead.

arrgh!
alas!
 
 
Our Lady of The Two Towers
09:29 / 07.02.03
I thought NK would pre-emtively attack South Korea, not America itself?
 
 
Saveloy
09:48 / 07.02.03
I assumed they meant an attack on the US troops that are amassing on the border and/or the US naval ships in the region.
 
 
STOATIE LIEKS CHOCOLATE MILK
11:13 / 07.02.03
Ah. But isn't South Korea part of a fictitious "Axis of Democracy" that those pesky Koreans, Iraqis and Palestinians wish to destroy?

(Note to self- stop believing everything you see on TV.)
 
  
Add Your Reply